Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto

Improved Essays
Gabriel Soriano
Professor Jacob
PHI 2010
3 December 2017
Karl Marx’s Communist Manifesto Authoritarian regimes, restricted freedom of speech, international conflicts. These are some of the factors that are often associated with communism from a modern perspective. Appropriation (and alteration) of Karl Marx’s philosophy for personal gain and quests for power by different figures throughout history created confusion a deviation from Marx’s original Ideas, which were inspired by the analysis of class struggles over history, as well as a profound disagreement with capitalism’s ulterior motives. To understand Karl Marx’s ethics and epistemology, it is important to take into consideration his background, as well as the social environment of his
…show more content…
Capitalism is a system driven by competition and changing supply and demand, based on private property. Marx’s description of Capitalism as the most efficient economic system is based on the growth of Capitalism during the 19th century in Europe due to the industrial revolution, as well as his views of the system as a whole. The mutual need between the bourgeois and proletariat based on the growing economic need of the working class and the growing ambitions and competition of the high class caused industry to grow at an exponential rate. Additionally, population growth during the time, leading to an increase in demand, added to the growth of capitalism. However, Marx describes Capitalism as the most pernicious of economic systems, because as it grows, and the bourgeois become wealthier, the proletariat increase in numbers, and become poorer. This interaction and what Marx considers to be its unfair qualities lead him to develop the Communist Manifesto. In the end, however, Marx believed that Capitalism created its own “grave diggers” as its growth also implied the growth of the number of people of the working class living under terrible conditions, as well as people who will eventually be inspired to want and seek change, causing Capitalism to be the cause of its own ending. In other words, the greed of the bourgeois leads to the growth of Capitalism and the growth of the proletariats, who …show more content…
Forces of production take into consideration anything that is necessary to produce the goods and services a society needs. This not only includes structures and raw materials, but also human labor as well. The form of production then refers to how these “forces” are then structured within a society to function and finally produce the necessary goods and services. Marx also discusses the role of technology in eventually replacing Capitalism. Technology, one of the main components of the industrial revolution which throve on Capitalism could actually bring Capitalism to its end (under Marx’s views) as it is always a contributor to change in society. Enough technological developments shifting society as a whole could eventually make the capitalist economic system obsolete, causing it to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    For Marx, capitalism is defined as the ownership of the means of production and private property. The history of class struggle becomes central to his theory; he describes the polarization…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The first section of the Communist Manifesto introduces many important ideas. One of the main topics in this sections is Marx’s thoughts…

    • 1362 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marx explains that in order for capitalism to continue the reproduction of the character of the worker and reproduction of worker needs to exist. The feudal system, in Marx’ eyes, persisted only when feudalism was widely accepted and endorsed by society. For capitalism it is the same. Capitalism is in the very fabric of society which is why the reproduction of the character of the worker has persisted. In the Critique of Capitalism Marx states, “the relations of production in their totality constitute what are called the social relations, society, and, specifically, a society at a definite stage of historical development, a society with a peculiar, distinctive character (207). ” In layman's terms Marx is expressing that our economic system (production) shapes (constitute) the fabrics of our society. The “social relations” currently upheld…

    • 1133 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Karl Marx was a German philosopher, economist, sociologist, journalist, historian and revolutionary socialist who died in 1883; thus, leaving behind his legacy through his theories. Contemporarily known as Marxism, it is understood that “Marx holds production to be both the most fundamental and the most encompassing of human activities” (Wood, 1981, p.32). Marxism exploits sociological and economic development through his theological approach to capitalism; this is not “an explanatory concept” but rather one to describe and diagnose the ramifications of capitalism by examining its ethical parameters (Wood, 1981, p.44). A capitalist society defines a ruling class which sells the labour power of the working classes in return for a working wage. Further…

    • 1494 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Karl Marx, the founder of the communism who later on wrote the book about it called, “ The Communist Manifesto.” Marx hated the capitalism and the Burgeois and also liked it for some other reasons. According to Marx, capitalism is good and bad for many different reasons. The good reason is that it keeps a stable economy where the jobs are created for the middle and the lower class. Capitalism has created the strong economy throughout industrialization and civilization. It has built cities and technologies where human life got lot easier. The Bourgeois for this reason deserves an applause according to Marx. As he states in his book, “it has created enormous cities, has greatly increased the urban population as compared with the rural and has…

    • 142 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Marxism In Fight Club

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Capitalism, according to Marx, is a mode of production based on private ownership of the means of production. It is a system of social relations in which labour-power is commodified and the driving force of society is the accumulation of capital. Marx theorized that economic systems result in two social classes, one of which holds the power and uses it to oppress the other. In capitalism, this is the bourgeoisie, the capitalists, who own the means of production, and the proletariat who’s labour allows the system to function and is the source of the bourgeoisie’s power. As such, the social relations of production are antagonistic. Given this power struggle class conflict is inherent. Marx’s critique of capitalism speculates that the proletariats…

    • 1340 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With capitalism, the world divided into two main classes: the proletariat and the bourgeoisie. In term of relation of production, this is about the antagonized relationship between wage labor and capitalist. The wage labors are not commodity and have no ownership, so they have no choice but only sell their labor power to bourgeoisie that is commodified to produce surplus and work for wages to survive. Their labor power is to exchange their means of subsistence. In contrast, capitalists are the ruling class that has the private ownership of means of production and earn profit, which is generated by the working labors. “Capital, also, is a social relation of production. It is a bourgeois production relation, a production relation of bourgeois society. ” (206) In term of the forces of production, capitalism motivates the bourgeoisie to purchase expensive machines and use the labor division method in…

    • 829 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Marx is a materialist and he believes that we need to start with the material conditions of life, such as how human beings work to feed, clothe, and house themselves and their family. The material conditions of life change over time, which comes from the development of technology (what Marx calls “productive forces”) and the social relations associated with it. This historical development is not linear. Instead, it proceeds through moments of agreement and moments of contradiction between the “productive forces” and the “relations of production.” Feudal production turned into bourgeoisie revolution that leads to a bourgeois mode of production and cause proletarian revolution ultimately. The capitalist mode of production contains within itself…

    • 147 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This essay will explain why Karl Marx’s predictions about the collapse of capitalism did not take place. Marx insisted on socialism being inverse of capitalism: where he declared capitalism unjust, socialism would be just; where he declared capitalism exploitative, socialism would be some opposite; where he declared worker to be alienated due to capitalism, in socialism the worker would be mystically engaged to his product of work; where he declared capitalism to be class-based, socialism would be classless.…

    • 966 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He argues that the amount of production a country is capable of could not be fully utilized because of the political order. The result of this imbalance is the swift restructuring of political order to allow for the utilization of the labor force for production. However, because of this rapid shift, dramatic economic crises occurred in the mid-18th century due to the effects of overproduction. In order to balance the effects of overproduction, the capitalists reached out to new markets, and further exploited the markets they currently had. This cycle of expansion and exploitation would eventually come to a head in Marx’s opinion, increasing the pressures on the new working class, everyone except the Bourgeoisie. These pressures created by capitalism would eventually lead to the creation of this new class, which he called the…

    • 491 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    One of Marx’s core concerns is capitalism. In his book Capital: Volume 1 and many other articles, he provides an understanding of the nature of capitalism and describes how a capitalist society is designed to increase the exploitation of the proletariat to provide profit for the bourgeoisie. As well as, analysing how the “rule of the bourgeois democrats… will carry within it the seeds of its own destruction” (Marx and Engels, 2016). Marx’s analysis has inspired a great deal of sociological research and is fundamental in understanding contemporary society. However, there is some debate on the accuracy of Marx’s analysis of capitalism. Due to his moral point…

    • 1537 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Marx believed in historical materialism and class struggle, which shows that the private ownership of the means of production allowed the bourgeoisie to retain power over a larger powerless proletarian who provided labor to the means of production. As a consequence of this inequality of power, Marx concludes, social and moral problems were inherent in the capitalist system, which forced the competition and create unnecessary antagonisms, essentially isolating the proletariat in their social status across generations.…

    • 2197 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To sum up the chapter, Marx pointed how the capitalistic society is working in favor of the bourgeoisie not the proletarian (capitalist owner vs. workers, parallel to master vs. slave). Therefore, the more laborers there are, the more the bourgeoisie profits. If the production line becomes more efficient, then the profits will increase as well the pocket size of the bourgeoisie. As the wage labor market grows, the number of workers entering the job market will expand, until machine replaces them. Products, then, will be produced at a lower price, where the owner will keep their products at the old price, but their profit still accrued. That is, until the competitors switch to machinery and follow the same procedure. Then the new product price will be significantly lower since all the companies are competing for customers (capitalism). This cycle would just repeat itself in all aspects of the business world. Marx offered the readers the idea of progression of society, freedom of movement, expansion, etc., but all the exploitation and corruption aspects of capitalism. Employees will be forced to work at a lower salary, the job market will shrink, and the gap between the rich and the poor will only get bigger. “Therefore, as labour becomes more…

    • 1143 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Power is significant and is to be achieved by market and class. Class relationships are defined by an era’s means of production. (3/14) However, eventually these relationships cease to be compatible with the developing forces of production. At this point, a revolution occurs and a new class emerges as a ruling one, which is driven by larger economic forces. (pg. 2 & 3) One thing that Marx does not focus on is economics, but does realize that one does need to understand economics to understand capitalism. Marx theorized that we need to overthrow capitalism and a global revolution need to transpire to overcome some of society’s conflicts and struggles. He is intensive on the now or the present when it comes to a system of production and the accumulation of wealth on class. (3/17) Like Durkheim, Marx uses a linear approach, which results in one thing leading to another. As simple as one thing going from point A to point B. (2/9) Marx talks about how capitalism is derived from the past. His main focus is on class because it is made up of people from different genders, races, and so on. He is not focused on social conflict, but class conflict. Yet again, Marx’s concentrations are on how and why capitalism needs to be overthrown. It is not practical to reform capitalism…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the first stage, production grew due to increasing division of labour. However, this was not enough to meet the demands of ever-expanding markets. This resulted in the improvement of technical knowledge and henceforth mechanization became a hallmark of capitalism. Marx believed capitalist society to be divided into 2 main classes- the bourgeois or the capitalist class which owns the means of production, & the proletariat or the working class which sells its labour in the market. The capitalist operates on the profit motive & does not pay workers, drawn from the industrial reserve army, wages equivalent to the value created by them. The surplus value becomes the source of this profit. Further division of labour increases the alienation of workers in that they do not feel a sense of pride and ownership over the fruits of their labour. Marx uses the term ‘capitalist anarchy' to describe the inherent instability of the system due to constant revolutionizing of the instruments of production and its subjection to market forces. The concentration of property and wealth in the hands of a few, also leads to greater political centralization with laws being formulated in favour of the bourgeois. Marx applauded the move towards industrialization and urbanization for freeing men from the burden of traditional ties and sentiment and simplifying class antagonisms. He believed that capitalism harboured its own seeds of destruction. The concentration of labour in the workplace, combined with their increasing pauperization, would end their isolation and create consciousness of their exploitation. Their numbers would rise further due to the descent of the petty bourgeoisie into poverty. This will lead to greater polarization of the classes and eventually the working class will transform from a ‘class in itself' to a ‘class for itself'. According to Marx, all previous historical movements were led by…

    • 2286 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays