I believe that Kant would argue that the previous statement isn't moral for multiple different reasons. First off, Kant says that in order to form the categorical imperative then you must have no moral reasoning at all when coming to a conclusion. Therefore, by volunteering with a motive you're going against the rules of Kant by allowing moral perceptions to get in the way of the actual situation at hand. Secondly, Kant solidified the idea of the "golden rule" when it comes to decision making. If you apply the rule in this situation you would end up with something similar to this; I'm okay with someone doing 'x' activity for me because it benefits that persons only reasoning behind it is that it benefits themselves. Personally it may just
