Kant's Two Aspects Of The Moral Law

Improved Essays
By the third section of the Groundwork, Kant has explained two aspects of the moral law that ground his discussion of freedom and why we must presuppose it’s existence as a property of the will of all rational beings. First, morality functions as a law for humanity only insofar as human beings are rational beings. In other words, the supreme practical principle of morality is a law that is valid for all rational beings, and because human beings are rational, it is a law that is valid for humanity. Second, the principle of morality must be determined by the quality of freedom alone. Kant claims that it follows from these two aspects of the moral law that the will of all rational agents must be considered free. That is to say, it must be proven that the activity of all rational beings in general contains the quality of freedom. …show more content…
This is not say that freedom is not governed by laws that stem from a notion of causality. Rather, if it is governed to laws in accordance with some special kind of causality, the contents of those laws are not accessible in the sensible world in the way that scientific laws relating to fungi gr. Kant argues that it follows from this that freedom must be presupposed as a property of the will of all rational beings in order to conceive of an agent willing anything at all. He does this by explaining the connection that our own idea of freedom has to our ability to be actually free with regard to matters of practical

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Kant proposes there are laws dictating two types of behavior, involuntary behavior (biological needs, impulse, etc.,) and voluntary behavior (morals and free will) (Kant 4:388). He distinguishes irrational beings as those acting from impulse from rational beings as those who can deliberate and act from free will or reason. Kant claims the major difference between irrational beings and rational beings is in the ability for their actions to be universalized; it is sustainable and maintains order for all beings to act from reason at all times but it is not sustainable for all beings to act from impulse or inclination because these are subjective values and often lead to selfish behavior (Kant 4:402). For Kant, this is the categorical imperative that guides morality; he puts forth the claim that all rational beings should behave in a way that could be written into law and order would be maintained (Kant 4:416). Additionally, the categorical imperative is “limited by no condition and, as absolutely although practically necessary, can be called quite strictly a command” (Kant 4:417)…

    • 862 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant is a modern philosophical figure who continues to exercise influence today in metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, political philosophy, aesthetics and a significant number of other fields. Freedom is important to Kant's view because moral appraisal presumes that we are free in the sense that we have the ability to do otherwise. To see why, consider Kant's example of a man who commits a theft, Kant holds that in order for this man's action to be morally wrong, it must have been within his control in the sense that it was within his power at the time not to have committed the theft. If this was not within his control at the time, then, while it may be useful to punish him in order to shape his behavior or to influence others, it…

    • 323 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Autonomy can be considered the right to govern your own body and decisions and with this principle Kant states it through arguing the principle of morality. The principle of morality is argued in three ways the first as acting though the maxim of our actions, through our will, were to become a universal law, second is the humanity principle where we act in such a way so as to not treat people as a means but as an end, and lastly act only so that our will could regard itself as giving universal law though its maxim. The foundations for the categorical imperative, where an action is necessary in or itself, include acting in a way that the maxim of our actions could be used as a Universal Law, where we always act in a way that we treat humanity…

    • 1783 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Critique of Pure Reason,Kant distinguishes between the transcendental idea of freedom, which as a psychological concept is "mainly empirical" and refers to "the question whether we must admit a power of spontaneously beginning a series of successive things or states" as a real ground of necessity in regard to causality, and the practical concept of freedom as the independence of our will from the "coercion" or "necessitation through sensuous impulses". Kant finds it a source of difficulty that the practical idea of freedom is founded on the transcendental idea of freedom,but for the sake of practical interests uses the practical meaning, taking "no account of its transcendental meaning," which he feels was properly "disposed of" in the…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Kant's Code Of Ethics

    • 92 Words
    • 1 Pages

    1. No. Because the person is desire to do immoral actions. He/she has free will and he/she spontaneously wanted to do immoral actions. Although he still does not because they too recognize what the moral law requires.…

    • 92 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    This philosophical question is still not unsolved, but in this essay I will argue that a freedom of choice cannot be had by an agent in a deterministic world. Determinism thesis states that all events in the universe are determined by previous events. In determinism, every even is determined to happen by the laws of the the system.it is assumed that once the laws are set and the systems are decided, everyone following the event in the system is also decided. This assumption proves that humans are not free to chose how they act, but are determined by prior events over which they have no control over. The freedom that is precluded by determinism is the freedom to act without recourse to prior events, which means not having a choice determined and is able to act many different ways in any situation regardless of the cause.…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    To demonstrate how Kant’s notion of freedom is related to his view of the Moral Law I will outline…

    • 1129 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Secularism Vs Kant

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This assumption of humans inherently possessing the ability to know without outside doctrines of what is right and wrong allows for his basis of autonomy through reason. The possession of presupposed, innate knowledge exists within what he declares as phenomenal reality thus allows for the ability to use reason without an external influence (Kant, 1787). Kant separates what is commonly misconstrued as free will by determining if the action is done using the reason derived purely from the individual (Kant 1785). An action must be correct and in the best interest of the individual through their own intrinsic moral laws they have set upon themselves. Because of their presupposed knowledge of morals, an individual now possesses intellectual autonomy.…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Absolute moral rules mean the rules that everyone must follow in order to act morally. They are the rules that hold under any circumstances universally. I think the best candidates of absolute moral rules are a) We should never lie and b) We should never kill innocent people. There are strong arguments for candidate a)…

    • 846 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Free Will Vs. Determinism

    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Thus, actions must be caused properly in order for them to be free, and that the proper cause must come from inside the person. Compatiblists declare that the common usage of the word free will is essential for determining the correct definition. For example, say that in scenario one, I don’t get on the Internet for a week because I do not have any direct or wireless access to the Internet. In scenario two, I do not get on the Internet for a week because the FBI is tracking me, and I don’t want to get caught. Scenario one, is a case where I was forced to stay off the Internet.…

    • 2021 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant believed that the moral worth of an action depends solely on the motive of the action and that the supreme principle of morality is the categorical imperative. Now, consider that a man named Jones is terminally ill with only a week to live and his last week will be full of pain and misery. However, Jones, his family, and his physicians all agree that a drug-induced, painless death would be preferable; Jones just has to determine if an induced death is morally permissible. In order to do this Jones’, his family and his physicians must test their action as a categorical imperative by using Kant’s Universal Law, Law of Nature, and Humanity Formulation.…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Emanuel Kant’s Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, he provides his readers with the definition of free will. Moreover, from his definition of free will, Kant will attempt to prove that free will is the equivalence of following the set of moral laws that you would want everyone else to pursue. In this paper, we will focus on Kant’s concept of a free will, and the inferences he makes in order to prove his conclusion that free will is equivalent to following moral laws as long as the moral laws don’t violate the categorical imperative. In addition, after explaining Kant’s argument, we will try to argue against Kant’s concept of free will.…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant imposes the idea of the “purity of the will” which expands on the principle that one should act…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “We could not prove freedom to be something actual in ourselves and in human nature. We saw merely that we must presuppose it if we want to think of a being as rational and as endowed with consciousness of its causality as regards actions” (Page 311). Immanuel Kant believed that freedom is a presupposition of morality. Kant was not concerned with the purity of your will for doing something, but rather with the derivation of moral principles from reason alone for example independently of experience. He focused on emphasized the importance of reason and the ration that comes with our moral principles.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, Immanuel Kant discusses laws of nature and freedom and acting with reason versus impulse, with the implication of free will. This explication will discuss the qualifications of reason and being rational, acting in conformity of the law or with the representation of the law, and giving oneself a law with free will. These premises set by Kant lead him to conclude that only rational beings have the ability to act “in accordance with the representation of laws” and this ability gives rational beings free will (4:413). Kant puts forth the premise that “everything in nature works in accordance with laws” (4:413). Within these laws, there are laws dictating biological needs, impulse, inclinations, and facts (such as gravity or hunger) and there are laws dictating voluntary behavior, such as the laws of freedom, that guide morals.…

    • 702 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays