Immanuel Kant's Influence Today

Improved Essays
Immanuel Kant is a modern philosophical figure who continues to exercise influence today in metaphysics, epistemology, ethics, political philosophy, aesthetics and a significant number of other fields. Freedom is important to Kant's view because moral appraisal presumes that we are free in the sense that we have the ability to do otherwise. To see why, consider Kant's example of a man who commits a theft, Kant holds that in order for this man's action to be morally wrong, it must have been within his control in the sense that it was within his power at the time not to have committed the theft. If this was not within his control at the time, then, while it may be useful to punish him in order to shape his behavior or to influence others, it

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Immanuel Kant On Duty

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Philosophy is a discipline that studies how one ought to live, as well as study reality, nature, existence, etc. However, there are a number of philosophers who propose differing sets of morals and have different ideas of living life to its fullest (Singer v. Mill). Kant proposes that moral actions are defined by the motivation of an action, and later on explains that moral actions are duties through reason, rather than inclination. This essay will explain the validity of Kant’s argument by first explaining Kant’s view on duty, then analyse his view of duty as an object of good will, which pertains to motivations without the slightest selfishness, then argue for moral duties motivated by duty instead of inclination based on reason. It is difficult…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kant effectively quantifies freedom via his argument for his idea of enlightenment, public/private divide, trade off between rational and physical productivity and finally international governance. He runs into problems however in that he fails to effectively quantify the means of acquiring his aspirational goals of perfect moral constitution, universal enlightenment as well as global cosmopolitan governance. The following section will outline first the public private divide followed by means not considered (harm principle) and the second section will outline the means towards global cosmopolitanism as well as the limitations considered. The attainment of enlightenment is one of the highest level of understanding for Kant and correlates…

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Kant's Immature Self

    • 85 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Kant acknowledges that it is extremely difficult for man to get to a position of maturity alone but it is easier if a group of people to do it get there together. It is when a person starts depending on other people to guide him, it is difficult to break out of that and start thinking on his own. Kant also expresses in his essay that a person needs certain qualities to be able leave his immature self, and this includes being fearless and…

    • 85 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant Personal Response

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In the essay, he emphasizes on the need for people to use their own powers of understanding and reasoning instead of depending on others or on an external system to provide it to them. This essay is essentially a plea for the vital importance of freedom of speech, thought, and debate. When people use other people to make his decisions, their life becomes much easier. But in this process, Kant argues that it disables them from taking their own decisions with their own intellect and hence people gets ultimately immature. This immaturity becomes second nature to him.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    John Stewart Mill and Immanuel Kant are two of the most influential philosophers in history. Their philosophies of utilitarianism and deontology, respectively, have different fundamental values and priorities. The fundamental principle of utilitarianism is that actions are morally correct in proportion to how much happiness they create, henceforth all people should strive to promote happiness and pleasure. Happiness, Mill states, is the ultimate objective of all human actions; one shall prefer those actions which yield the most happiness.…

    • 1645 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant would disagree with this because to him freedom is a…

    • 1988 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Immanuel Kant’s “Grounding for the Metaphysics of Morals” he was trying to persuade us to understand how to construct the nature of the human mind and its universal laws of ethics. Kant wrote this book basically to explain the rules of justice and how can the human mind be virtuous. He helps us to understand the morality of your individual human rights as well as justice. Rights are enforceable good claims against others, so in expressing that others have a commitment to regard my rights we are at the same time insisting my entitlement to utilize constrain to secure my rights. Kant explains his morality philosophy as the good versus the bad.…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant’s Moral Theory is widely studied in philosophy and the field of ethics. In his theory, Kant expresses the ways to determine the morality of an action: examining the intentions behind the action in question is most important instead of merely considering the consequences. Moral actions, he explains, must have the intention of being consistent with duty for the sake of duty and doing the right thing; they cannot be motivated by any inclinations. Actions inconsistent with duty would be, for example, lying, cheating, stealing, or breaking a promise. These actions could never be moral in any case since they defy the honesty of duty.…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    But what does the word freedom mean? How are we to judge the rightness of any action without a coherent understanding of what freedom others have and do not have? It is here that I believe many Kantian scholars run off-course in understanding Kant because they fail to take into account what precisely Kant means by the word freedom. This is probably for good reason though, as although our understanding of freedom here is absolutely crucial to Kant’s entire political philosophy, he never provides a categorical definition of what the word freedom means in relation to this…

    • 624 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Final Exam 1. In “A Critique of Utilitarianism”, Bernard Williams argues against the fundamental characteristics of utilitarianism and believes that the notion of ends justifying the means are a way of representing the doctrine of negative responsibility which can lead to consequences from the choices we make/do not make (663). As a result, we are all responsible for the consequences that we fail to prevent as well as the ones we brought upon ourselves. That is, in each case the choice on whether an action is right is determined by its consequences (661). Williams gives the example of killing one villager to save 19 others (664) in which he critiques the different principles of utilitarianism and integrity - the moral righteousness that is…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The source, “What is Enlightenment?” was created by Immanuel Kant, in 1794, which is an interesting personal narrative concerning enlightenment and riotousness of those worthy of such delicate information and intellectual journeys. Subsequently, the documentation goes into detail regarding personal choice and the different experiences that shape the way people view their surroundings and why some lack clear direction. I feel the source was created to acknowledge that some individuals display not a lack of understanding but a lack of resolution to use without direction from another. And as stated “Nature then, has carefully cultivated the seed within the hard core--namely the urge for and the vocation of free thought. And this free thought…

    • 275 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Critique of Pure Reason,Kant distinguishes between the transcendental idea of freedom, which as a psychological concept is "mainly empirical" and refers to "the question whether we must admit a power of spontaneously beginning a series of successive things or states" as a real ground of necessity in regard to causality, and the practical concept of freedom as the independence of our will from the "coercion" or "necessitation through sensuous impulses". Kant finds it a source of difficulty that the practical idea of freedom is founded on the transcendental idea of freedom,but for the sake of practical interests uses the practical meaning, taking "no account of its transcendental meaning," which he feels was properly "disposed of" in the…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Secularism Vs Kant

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages

    This assumption of humans inherently possessing the ability to know without outside doctrines of what is right and wrong allows for his basis of autonomy through reason. The possession of presupposed, innate knowledge exists within what he declares as phenomenal reality thus allows for the ability to use reason without an external influence (Kant, 1787). Kant separates what is commonly misconstrued as free will by determining if the action is done using the reason derived purely from the individual (Kant 1785). An action must be correct and in the best interest of the individual through their own intrinsic moral laws they have set upon themselves. Because of their presupposed knowledge of morals, an individual now possesses intellectual autonomy.…

    • 1475 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “We could not prove freedom to be something actual in ourselves and in human nature. We saw merely that we must presuppose it if we want to think of a being as rational and as endowed with consciousness of its causality as regards actions” (Page 311). Immanuel Kant believed that freedom is a presupposition of morality. Kant was not concerned with the purity of your will for doing something, but rather with the derivation of moral principles from reason alone for example independently of experience. He focused on emphasized the importance of reason and the ration that comes with our moral principles.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kantians argue that although we don't have control over the outcome of our actions, or the effect they will have, the only thing we do possess full control over is our motives behind the action. Thus our free will can only decide on our motives, meaning morality that is focused on the consequences of a situation is not concerned with autonomy of…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays