Kant's Paradox

Improved Essays
\par An expected value of the game is the total of all of expected payoffs of the consequences in the flips; thus, there is an infinite number of dollars a player can win in the game. Assume that the measurement of utility throughout the game can be put in a function $u(w)$. As mentioned before, the expected utility decreases as the total winning prize increases; thus, Bernoulli suggested the use of a logarithmic function, $u(w) = ln(w)$ to show the graph of the paradox. According to Ole Peters, who contributed in the writing of “The Time Resolution of the St Petersburg Paradox”, Bernoulli proposed the idea of the logarithmic function with the perception of an increasing in the player’s wealth correlates with the increase in utility, in which

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Immanuel Kant On Duty

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Philosophy is a discipline that studies how one ought to live, as well as study reality, nature, existence, etc. However, there are a number of philosophers who propose differing sets of morals and have different ideas of living life to its fullest (Singer v. Mill). Kant proposes that moral actions are defined by the motivation of an action, and later on explains that moral actions are duties through reason, rather than inclination. This essay will explain the validity of Kant’s argument by first explaining Kant’s view on duty, then analyse his view of duty as an object of good will, which pertains to motivations without the slightest selfishness, then argue for moral duties motivated by duty instead of inclination based on reason. It is difficult…

    • 1621 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kant effectively quantifies freedom via his argument for his idea of enlightenment, public/private divide, trade off between rational and physical productivity and finally international governance. He runs into problems however in that he fails to effectively quantify the means of acquiring his aspirational goals of perfect moral constitution, universal enlightenment as well as global cosmopolitan governance. The following section will outline first the public private divide followed by means not considered (harm principle) and the second section will outline the means towards global cosmopolitanism as well as the limitations considered. The attainment of enlightenment is one of the highest level of understanding for Kant and correlates…

    • 1511 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Kant's Perpetual Peace

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Kant’s essay ‘Perpetual Peace’ aims to provide the ideal conditions and institutions required to achieve long-term peace. Whilst Kant offers reasonable preliminary articles, they are inapplicable to the modern era of increasing military technology, economic interdependence, and human rights discourse. Kant further proposes concrete institutions, however, they are limited by: his universalistic notion that all Republics will avoid war regardless of national histories, his proposal of a federation without coercive powers and his undeveloped cosmopolitan institution in which he overlooks how national interests and his own liberal disposition affect the cosmopolitan goal for peace. Finally, whilst Kant projects history as progressing, he does not…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In my paper I will be discussing that Kantian Ethics can make decide to do the wrong thing sometimes because of Kant’s maxims, his view on good will and also and also will be discussing the FEI and treating humanity merely as a means, also will be discussing his views on reason vs. desire. With these reasons come objections can refute his belief by stating good points, this objection is the murderer at the door. Even though there are objection to Kantian ethics I will respond to these objections in such a way that Kant would respond to anyone with these objections. Therefore because of Kant’s maxims, his views on good will and also using his ideas on using a person merely as means and also the FEI and his views on reason vs. desire.…

    • 1381 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A runaway trolley will kill five people if it stays on its current path. I have the option to pull a lever and divert the trolley to an alternate track. In this case, it will only kill one person. What should I do? This is the trolley problem, a classic thought experiment whose outcome has numerous applications.…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant Personal Response

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Name- MAYANK MANGAL ID No.- 2014A4PS459H Assignment: Personal Response Essay Immanuel Kant : An answer to the question: What is Enlightenment An answer to the question: What is Enlightenment is an essay which was written by Immanuel Kant (1724-1804) in the year of 1784, the greatest modern philosopher of all times is deeply inspired by Rousseau from where he adopts the novelties of freedom as autonomy or itself legislation. The essay addresses the causes of lack of enlightenment and the preconditions which are necessary to make it possible to enlighten the people. Kant thinks that the people should be given freedom to use their own intellect and he abolished all church and state paternalism.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In “Rejecting All Lies: Immanuel Kant”, an article by Sissela Bok, Bok states that the truth can not be avoided, no circumstance can cause you to withhold the truth. Bok supports her claim by writing about Immanuel Kant who believes that you should not avoid the truth at any time, and having the benefit of being clear and not needing to track the lies you have told. Bok want to show all lies are not okay in any circumstance, whether it’s to save a person’s life, or to spare someone’s feeling.…

    • 91 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant believes that moral rules are not analytic but synthetic. They are not true just by the meaning of the words. We need to put something together (mental operation) just an operating of reason. For instance, for Kant killing people is wrong just by the definitions of the word but by reasoning. For example, if my car is red, I need to see it to know it.…

    • 776 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant Prolegomena Argument

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Kant Kant uses the Prolegomena his writings to educate teachers and learners on the potential of discovering the science of metaphysics. Kant in his writings questions the possibility of metaphysics claiming that it does not show a significant difference between truth and error. In fact, he maintains that metaphysics has not yet acquired universal access to knowledge that is capable of classifying it as a pure mathematics. Kant acts as the center of understanding the modern physics through the establishment of the understanding of pure knowledge of metaphysics. His critique of the impending theory of knowledge and Critique of Pure Reasoning relates the ancient studies with the upcoming philosophical studies.…

    • 1194 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1. What is the most significant thing I learned this week? In the reading of Contemplative Vision Chapter 2, the discussion of retreats truly helped open my eyes in the impact that spiritual retreats can have on our journey with God. Prior to reading this chapter I had the wrong idea of what a spiritual retreat was.…

    • 600 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant’s Groundworks of the Metaphysics of Morals, and Mill’s Utilitarianism, each offer different arguments about what is morality. They both give us fundamental and universal theories about morality. Before we compare the two, let’s first start with a summary of the main arguments of each philosopher. Mill begins chapter one by setting the stage for what he is going to discuss. Philosophers have discussed the foundation of morality for more than two thousand years.…

    • 1351 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Philosophy’s goal is to find a theory that acts as a guideline on how we, as humans, should act. Before Kant’s theories, philosophers struggled to find a moral rule or principle on how we should act towards other humans. Nevertheless, Kant came up with the Principle of Humanity to act as a main principle on how we should treat humans. The Principle of Humanity states that humans should treat other beings as an end and never as a mere means. To understand this theory, we must understand what Kant means by treating someone as an end, and also what it means to treat another as a mere means.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, giving money to a homeless person just to get him/her to leave you alone would be judged not moral by Kant because it was done for the wrong reason. With Kants belief in mind; if the consequence of immoral behavior were dealt with in a legal structure, people would be prosecuted for "EVERYTHING" since there are no extenuating circumstances. Kant's categorical imperative is a tri-dynamic statement of philosophical thought:(1) " So act that the maxim of you could always hold at the same time as a principle establishing universal law. "(2) "Act so as to treat humanity, whether in your own person in that of another, always as an end and never as a means only.…

    • 764 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant’s moral theory is based on the fact that one’s action should be governed by a maxim that follows the purity of the will; the idea that one’s actions should be based on a will that aligns with duty and not on the consequences of one’s actions. In the contrary, rule utilitarianism is based on the consequences of one’s actions and how it impacts the overall happiness of the individuals involved. The following paper focuses on the ideas of duty ethics and utilitarian ethics; and how these ideas can be implemented in the case of James Liang. Kant believes that an act is morally acceptable when such an act perfectly aligns with one’s duty. Furthermore, he believed that all rational beings are obligated by the demands of duty.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Ellsberg paradox is a paradox in decision theory in which people's choices violate the postulates of subjective expected utility. It is generally taken to be evidence for ambiguity aversion. Ellsberg actually proposed an experiment of coloured balls in urns. Subjects are asked to draw a coloured ball in one of the two urns. Each urn contains balls of two colours, either yellow or black.…

    • 2924 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Superior Essays