Kant's Argumentative Essay

Improved Essays
In more simple terms, the formulation translates to act on a maxim, or a motivating principle, that you would want to become a universal law. The key factor in the first formulation of the categorical imperative is the idea of a universal law. Kant stresses that one must rationalize whether their action should be applied universally. For example, if a man is considering lying because it is more convenient for him, then he must rationally decide whether the maxim could be applied universally. If the maxim is lying when convenient, then the man must imagine how the world would be if, universally, people lied when convenient. He would then rationalize that if lying when convenient was a universal law, then lying and honesty would become indistinguishable

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Some people may think determining the morality of an action as an easy task, and fail to realize that it is no easy task. Every action is driven by other actions, and depending on the circumstances, an act may be moral in some cases and not in others. This is why Kant favors the Categorical Imperative when compared to other methods of determining morality. The Categorical Imperative does not deal with circumstances, instead it denotes an all-encompassing rule that, if obeyed, means actions would be moral no matter what the situation may be. He first describes the Categorical Imperative when he states, “I should never act except in such a way that I can also will that my maxim should become a universal law” (Kant 14).…

    • 267 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I will begin this paper by stating that I take on the viewpoint of a Kantian. The issue at hand is whether a physician should harvest the organs of a Mr. X who is a convicted criminal, divorced, and has abandoned his two kids. Mr. X is currently in a deteriorating state, with only a few months to leave, thus the question posed, is whether a surgeon should be allowed to transplant his organs to five career-oriented individual persons who are all treasured by their families? Although these five individuals may suffer the fate of death, I truly stand on the notion that Mr, X should not be killed in order to save the lives of these five individuals. First off, I will begin with an obvious noteworthy point opposing my stance, which I later subject…

    • 992 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In late 2006, Volkswagen engineers were under pressure to complete the design and production of an EA 189 diesel engine that would adhere to the strict emissions standards enforced in the United States. The emission constraints imposed by the U.S. government contraindicated the self-imposed constraints to meet consumer demand of high power output and fuel efficiency. Volkswagen had already spent a substantial sum of money on research and development on designing this engine, and they had even more potential profits riding on the engine’s success. When it became clear that the EA 189 could not comply with the emissions testing standards while meeting the design constraints, somebody at Volkswagen (it is still unclear who) made the decision…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Categorical Imperative

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages

    There are two versions of the categorical imperative, and each one emphasizes a different aspect of the categorical imperative. But each of these versions is merely a different way of expressing the same rule. The first one is about the universality of rules, which stresses the importance of always acting in such a way that we would be willing for it to become a general law, and that everyone else should do the same thing in the same situation. This means that a rule should apply to everyone including me, otherwise it is not a valid rule. For example, if I wonder whether I should break a promise, I can test if this is right by asking myself whether I want it to be a universal rule…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One of the key claims made by Kant in his transcendental account of cognition is the fact that human beings are able to have empirical knowledge of their world. He also emphasizes that such empirical knowledge includes knowledge of the human being. For Kant, empirical study of the human being proceeds by introspection and observation of others, which both can face serious problems. First, due to the complexity of mental life, the human being typically acts differently when being observed. Second, self-observation is obstructed by the fact that, according to Kant, the most interesting and important activities in the life of a human being prevent the calm and attentive work of introspection.…

    • 291 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    When it comes to the use of emotion in relation to reason within the Enlightenment, at first glance, Kant’s definition of reason lacks any mention of it. However, in an article by Chad Wellmon, Kant suggests there is a connection between feeling and reason, and therefore reason is not only restricted to the intellect. What does it mean for reason to affect a feeling (or vice versa)? Kant suggests that “all feeling is sensual, and thus determined by natural causality, but on the other hand, he says that respect is a feeling effected through reason” (Wellmon 566).…

    • 1214 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Robert E. Kant Analysis

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Kant and many other philosophers hold that one has duties to oneself, including a duty to refrain from harmful activities. I, like Kant and many philosophers, believe that there can be duties that one owes to oneself. Refraining from smoking is one of these duties owed to oneself. Robert E. Goodin used a paternalist perspective to describe refraining from smoking as a duty owed to oneself. He explains that public officials are bound to evaluate one’s preferences and judge them according to a standard of one’s own deeper preferences.…

    • 282 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    There are countless people you could analyze for philosophers on metaphysics. Immanuel Kant is seen as the central figure for modern philosophy. He changed early modern rationalism and empiricism and set term for most of 19th and 20th century philosophy. He continues to have a great significance in today’s metaphysics. He also has an influence in epistemology, ethics, political, and many other fields.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Immanuel Kant Essay

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Immanuel Kant's Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals, states theory might be isolated into three fields: material science (the investigation of the physical world), morals (the investigation of ethics), and rationale (the investigation of consistent standards). These fields may include either "experimental" investigation of our encounters, or "immaculate" examination of ideas. "Power" is the investigation of unadulterated ideas as they identify with good or physical experience. Individuals by and large assume that ethical standards must apply to every single objective being at all spots and all times. Moral standards should consequently be founded on ideas of reason, rather than particularities of culture or identity.…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the Groundwork Kant argues reason is the source of morality and formulated a theory which he called “The Categorical Imperative.” It tries to reduce morality to simple rules that ejects the same moral choices every time. For Kant, if someone lived following the categorical imperative they would be moral. They would follow maxims, rules of conduct, that are universal, good for humanity, and autonomous. Kant’s view on morality and the categorical imperative does not provide clear moral answers to severe moral situations and leaves gray areas in modern situations.…

    • 1789 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his book, Critique of Pure Reason, Immanuel Kant makes several distinctions such as between a priori and a posteriori cognition, and between empirical reality and transcendental ideality. One of the main distinctions he makes is between matter of intuition and form of intuition. It was important to Kant to distinguish the difference between these two terms because they play a vital role in the first part of his book which is the ‘Transcendental Aesthetic.’ Kant’s book is significant because he overcomes the division between empiricism and rationalism. According to Kant, all knowledge is not derived from sensation, nor is all knowledge derived from reason.…

    • 1032 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The categorical imperative is a moral obligation that is not dependent on the situation of individual, meaning there is a set rule for everyone. A Kantian would say that in order to do something, everyone else must also be allowed to do it. This means that if someone can lie, then everyone can lie, and if someone can steal then everyone can steal. A Kantian would add that if the situation in which you try to achieve your maxim is immoral, do not give up. Rather, you should find a different way in which to achieve the maxim.…

    • 1294 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Final Paper Project My Baseline Ethics I define my own ethics, as the rules I impose on myself in how I should act based on what I think is right and moral principles. It helps me to think and reflect on any dilemma that I may face in my life before making a decision. Personally, I find that what could be right or wrong for me may be contrary for other persons because we all came from different cultures and countries, with different perspective of what is ethical or not. In general, I believe that those actions that violate the social norms of each society, especially pedophilia, rape, kidnapping, robbery and other social ills are bad. It seems to me that to make a fair judgment, I have to ask myself three things: Who did it?…

    • 3463 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant’s moral theory is based on the fact that one’s action should be governed by a maxim that follows the purity of the will; the idea that one’s actions should be based on a will that aligns with duty and not on the consequences of one’s actions. In the contrary, rule utilitarianism is based on the consequences of one’s actions and how it impacts the overall happiness of the individuals involved. The following paper focuses on the ideas of duty ethics and utilitarian ethics; and how these ideas can be implemented in the case of James Liang. Kant believes that an act is morally acceptable when such an act perfectly aligns with one’s duty. Furthermore, he believed that all rational beings are obligated by the demands of duty.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “We could not prove freedom to be something actual in ourselves and in human nature. We saw merely that we must presuppose it if we want to think of a being as rational and as endowed with consciousness of its causality as regards actions” (Page 311). Immanuel Kant believed that freedom is a presupposition of morality. Kant was not concerned with the purity of your will for doing something, but rather with the derivation of moral principles from reason alone for example independently of experience. He focused on emphasized the importance of reason and the ration that comes with our moral principles.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays