Kant Vs Animals

Improved Essays
Coffrin immediately starts off saying animals are tortured and abused, and in many are used in repetitive research that is unnecessary. Coffrin states how the bible places humans above animals in terms of superiority, and that they are not afforded the same blessings from God that man are given. The author also brings up the social idea of the food chain that is used to justify our superiority over animals. While these examples may give us the natural right to consume animals for food, it does not justify humans to treat animals however they please. Aquinas and Kant both have a similar idea of animals being there to serve humans. Kant reasons animals serve simply as a mean to an end. Bentham argued that the interest of an animal need to be

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Ought animals have rights, or ought they fall under the category of being morally considerable? I argue that there is no single framework in which to address the moral treatment of animals. A careful blend of these two ideas, moral rights and…

    • 1538 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As the wise man Edward Freeman once said, “These awful wrongs and sufferings forced upon the innocent, helpless, faithful animal race, form the blackest chapter in the whole world’s history.” In the article “A Change of Heart about Animals” Jeremy Rifkin discusses that animals are no different than humans. Being no different than humans means that someone or something is similar to a human being because of either their characteristics or similar body parts. Animals are like humans in the way that they are intelligent, affectionate, and skillful. Animals learn by their behavior as well as humans, however, the only difference is many animals are brutally abused.…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Frey cites animals as having lesser value because of their lack of agency, however, the mere fact that animals cannot be moral agents does not exclude them from being moral patients. Humans need to exercise their agency, be morally responsible and give animals consideration because of their status as moral patients and their ability to suffer.3 This…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Peter Singer in the article “All Animals are Equal,” defends the opinion that non-human animals must be respected as the lives of humans. He argues that all animals are equals. Singer claims equality is the base on same consideration, is a moral idea, and the capacity to suffer is a prerequisite for rights. To demonstrate that equality is based on equal consideration, Peter argues ideas to not extend the rights to non humans are inconsistent.…

    • 210 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the article “A Change of Heart about Animals”, Jeremy Rifkin argues that animals should be treated humanely because, according to science, the differences between animals and humans are less than what we think. He believes that animals should be given the rights that protect them from inhumane treatment and human consumption. He is telling us that we have to give them the same rights that a human possesses. In affirmation to Jeremy Rifkin, we should treat animals humanely because they also have a heart that can feel pain and a brain that can think.…

    • 773 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, Kant contends that “animals are not self-conscious and are there merely as means to an end” (Lectures on Ethics, 239). This conveys that marine animals like dolphins and belugas aren’t self-conscious so it’s ethically right to utilize them as means for human ends including research purposes or entertainment reasons. According to Kant, humans have a right to use animals as means to their purposes such as viewing whales in the aquarium for pleasure and amusement or experimenting on belugas for future discoveries regarding marine life because these marine animals aren’t part of the moral community, which consists of individuals who possess moral regard (Lectures on Ethics, 239). Moreover, animals aren’t a part of the moral community because they lack the capacity for rational autonomy, and therefore animals cannot make moral decisions (Warriner, 4).…

    • 1476 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Immanuel Kant’s impact on Western thought is undoubtedly profound. Being one of the most distinguished figures of the German Idealist movement of the late 18th and early 19th centuries, Kant’s work has set a precedent that, to this day, deeply influences our understanding of ethical discussion, political philosophy, and human cognition. Kant’s multiple contributions still are subject of debate; although, it is his Categorical Imperative that gathers the most attention, discourse, and controversy. Being a reaction to the subjectivity of his era, the Categorical Imperative provides an objective and infallible guideline for universal moral behavior, that stipulates one’s actions should not be dependent on ulterior motives and in consideration that the act itself will become universally accepted, ergo, if one were to steal then one should also be accepting of…

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    At the beginning of the essay, the writer Peter Singer introduces a form, speciesism, which means the “attitude of bias toward the interests of members of one’s own species and against those of members of other species”(204). Singer raises the largest problem which is most people are speciesists, who do not propose the principle of equal consideration of interests to other species as well as their own. He compares it with sexism and racism in order to show they apply equally. Singer agrees with Bentham’s statement that the capacity for suffering and enjoyment is the prerequisite for having all interests. The limit of sentience of animals is the only defensible boundary of concern for the interests of others.…

    • 592 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In comparison of “All Animals Are Equal and Moral Standing,” the “Value of Lives, and Speciesism” the key differences are based on the values outlined by the writers. In Value of Lives and Speciesism, Frey discusses the importance of animals feel pain and suffer just as humans do, but also admits that there are reasons such as necessary medical research for harming animals. On the other hand, Singer’s All Animals Are Equal focuses on the rights of hemostats in comparison to those who can make intelligent decisions. The question is should non-human animals have rights and how far do those rights reach? Both agree that animals should have rights, but their major differences including, pleasure and pain, hierarchy, consumption, and richness of life.…

    • 1155 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The basic difference between animals and humans is free will. There are two principles, which are repugnance and pity. These two principles…

    • 793 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ethical treatment of animals has been an increasingly growing controversy within the last few decades. Although not historically associated, Western philosophy has become a significant and supportive aspect of this delicate topic. The two philosophers that are most often considered are John Stuart Mill and Immanuel Kant. In this essay, we’ll take a closer look at how these two philosophers’ ideology compare and differ when it comes to animal ethics.…

    • 950 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peter Singer Speciesism

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages

    In “Speciesism and the Equality of Animals”, Peter Singer advocates against the use of animals in satisfying the needs of humans, and placing the interests of the humans above those of other species (277). Singer utilizes the term “speciesism” to describe this prejudice, which Singer finds to be no different than racism and sexism, and questions the exploitation of nonhumans by illustrating how one is not entitled to exploit another due to higher intelligence (277). In addition, Singer cites a passage from Jeremy Bentham that alludes to the fact that having the capacity for suffering is a vital characteristic that gives a being the right to be viewed as equal (Bentham qtd. in 278). Hence, Singer notes that capacity for suffering and/or enjoyment,…

    • 517 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes Vs Kant

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Kant and Hobbes have extremely inverse comprehension of the issue of ethical quality . This uniqueness was instructed by their moving idea structures. Kant took a more rationalistic point of view towards profound quality, while Hobbes was more experimental in nature. In any case, both proceeded from a subjective point. That is to express that they received a human instinct centered system to issues of profound quality.…

    • 1022 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant defines objectification as mentioned above, as ‘the reducing of a person, a being with humanity, to the position of an object’. The idea of humanity for Kant was the personal lucid nature and capability for rational choice it is about determining what is valuable, and furthermore finding ways to enhance and develop these particular values. Kant’s holds a large weight of significance over the respect for humanity to one’s self and to others around them, he states ‘Humanity must never be treated simply as a means, but always at the same time as an end’ (Kant 1797, 209). Similarly, to Mackinnon and Dworkin, Kant believes that sexual objectification is not morally permissible, however unlike Mackinnon and Dworkin, he believes that there is a solution to sexual objectification.…

    • 445 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Christian ethics are founded on principles about God’s connection to the world and his people. Ethics are extremely important in a Christian life as they provide a moral compass to guide the Christian, giving purpose and value to their life (Bulmer & Doret, 2008). Bioethics concerns itself with the ethical questions that come about in the relationship between medicine and life, the research and practice in these areas and the connections with politics and law (Clark, 2009). Since different denominations may interpret scripture in their own way and have diverse views on what other sources of authority can be accepted, defining the Christian response to bioethics is not as simple as stating that all Christian adherents have the same reply. Genetic…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays