Macalia's Role In Justice Scalia

Superior Essays
Inarguably, the Supreme Court has played an imperative role in the development and evolution of the fellow coordinate branches of government and in the society of the United States as well, and what is deducible as a consequence of this is that the individuals whom have served within this institution have incorporated, however subtly, their own inclinations into this evolution. Indeed, it is a matter-of-fact that throughout all of our lives, it is impossible to avoid the persuasions of family, peers, and societal constructs upon the reflections and perceptions that we utilize in order to derive our own attitudes, values, and ideologies. Additionally, the scope and position of the Supreme Court has provided it with unique opportunities in which …show more content…
Specifically, Justice Scalia is thoroughly and devoutly Catholic, and this, in itself, has no negative bearing on him whatsoever; however when applied as the guiding principle in rendering decisions, it serves, at least in the above context, to eliminate from his position any legal legitimacy. Interestingly, Scalia has long maintained and disseminated the notion of himself as an originalist: “he argues that judges should not allow their ‘intellectual, moral and personal perceptions’ to influence the interpretive task’” . However, Justice Scalia’s originalist approach is overshadowed by his devotion to the perceptual frameworks that have been instilled within him through his rearing in a devoutly Catholic home by parents of an immediate Sicilian ancestry, and through his education at St. Francis Xavier Military Academy, Georgetown University, and Harvard Law School. The consequences of this have rendered Justice Scalia stereotypically utilitarian (viz., pragmatic in the general sense of the term) in the sense that he is choosing what it is that will result in the best outcome of a case via what is most compatible with his personal values (i.e., what it is that seems the best to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Storm Center Summary

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Like Amar, O’Brien goes into extensive details in his writings to better explain his point of view. Throughout chapter six of storm center, O’Brien gives multiple examples and details on how the supreme court and American way of life impact one another. After reading this chapter I feel more educated on the impact of the American life and supreme court and gained knowledge on information I did not know before. Three main points that caught my attention throughout this chapter were: the impact of public opinion on the supreme court, media coverage and the supreme court, and the implementation of unpopular supreme court decisions.…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In assessing the value of the differences between the original text presented regarding the Arizona Constitution and the relevant provision which states simply that “the people have the power to propose laws and amendments to the constitution through the process of initiative and referendum,” the main revisions which offer stark contrasts to the original version as presented by Justice Ginsburg are the omissions of the “coordinate nature” language regarding the electorate of Arizona and the placement of the practice of initiative under the article of the state constitution “concerning the Legislative Department,”. The language excluded in this instance from the state constitution loosens the protection the document provides for the assertion…

    • 467 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    I contend that as time alters, the Judicial Branch has adapted to be the most powerful because of its…

    • 1832 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jeffrey Toobin Essay

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Throughout the nonfiction book by Jeffrey Toobin, he talks about the justice system and the Supreme Court in the United States and how it functions and also how it has changed over the years in history. The book shows a great look at how individuals such as George W. Bush in how they hold their power and how the justice system affects that. Also giving a great understanding with Justice Sandra Day O'Connor's alienation. It also touches on the topic of a “fight” of conservatives that were taking control or trying to take control of the supreme court. Despite that there were many more republican appointees on the court it fails in the 80s and 90s.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Robert Jackson Influences

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages

    After the death of Roosevelt, the relationships and ideas of FDR’s justices diverged. In part, due to a series of unfortunate events, such as the Republicans taking back the Senate and House, the weak Harry Truman in office, and numerous personal frustrations, contempt bred rapidly among the justices (306). Where once bonds held these men together, the justices became bitter enemies. While none of the justices were actual “friends,” camps, or alliances, seemed to form on the bench. On one side were Justices Frankfurter and Jackson, the other Justices Black and Douglas.…

    • 1411 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Supreme Court also thought about how society would interact if there were more feeble-minded people than not and reflects on how they wanted to maintain a healthy balance in society. Lastly, the Supreme Court felt as though it were their responsibility to help the society thrive as best as it could, even if it included eliminating certain factors like “feeble minded genes”. The Supreme Court had a duty to uphold as the background supporter of the…

    • 937 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It established the Supreme Court’s power and legitimacy as a co-equal branch of government (McBride) and shed light on the importance of judicial…

    • 704 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever heard of the phrase “supreme court”? Well, in the judicial branch of the United States government, the phrase is an everyday thing for them. This is because they work in law and, more specifically, the supreme justices of court. Basically, it’s their job to serve up justice. This type of thing, was what Thurgood Marshall ended up doing for a living.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By the middle of the eighteenth century, the United States consisted of thirteen colonies ruled by British government. The northern colonies were founded by people who were religious and believed in strong work ethic whereas the southern colonies were Puritans who settled in New England to gain religious freedom from Britain while the first colonists of the southern colonies were Englishmen. The first settlers of the west were Scots-Irish people who settled in deep-soiled Pennsylvania when the English government placed restrictions on their productions of linens and woolens. In 1607, Englishmen of southern colonies started the first permanent settlement of the United States at Jamestown in order to find gold to become wealthy. The first colonists…

    • 1071 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history, there has been countless ways in which a judge has conducted themselves within a courtroom. Throughout this interval of recreation, there has been only a handful that have ultimately transformed the world we live in today. One of those is known as the Warren Court Era of 1953-1969. Within the courtroom, the Warren Court era has represented a time of trial, struggle, and change, crossing the lines that were once put in front of us to follow. This was a time when judicial philosophy re-defined the way in which we viewed the judicial system as well as a copious outbreak of judicial activism.…

    • 145 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Judicial Restraint Essay

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages

    As we know about the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court is made up of nine justices, coming from varied religious and ethnic backgrounds with six males and three females. Presidents nominate Justices for life tenure and they must be confirmed by majority vote of the Senate. According to NY Times article that has the title” Supreme Court Ruling Makes Same-Sex Marriage a Right Nationwide”, on June 27th, the US Supreme Court decided 5-4 that same-sex couples have a ‘fundamental’ right to marry, and thus overturned the laws of at least 17 states. In this assignment, I will discuss the arguments both for and against judicial activism vs. judicial restraint, using the 2015 gay marriage case of OBERGEFELL ET AL. v. HODGES, DIRECTOR, OHIO DEPARTMENT…

    • 1859 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    That a case arising under the constitution should be decided without examining the instrument under which it arises?” ( John Dickhaus; 2013) This decision means the rights were given to the Supreme Court to decide this case even though it was stated in the constitution. The courts give many reasons for us to be ashamed of them, but does this warrant the need to limit the tenure of federal judges and turn the court into a partisan war zone? Justices are not concerned with popularity, they make hard, life altering decisions every day without the fear of making many people mad. Justice should be able to sit the bench without fear of worrying about their positions in the court and focus their time and energy on the hard judicial case decisions that come their…

    • 1421 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    A Legal and Ethical Analysis of the Appointment of Supreme Court Justices in the Constitution Act of 1867 The legal and ethical issues regarding the appointment of Supreme Court Justices will be examined within the context of the Constitution Act of 1867. The issue of Judicature (Section VII) in the Constitution defines the role of the governor General in the appointment of Supreme Court Justices under the guidance of the Queen’s government. In recent times, the Prime minister can provide “advice” for the Governor General in the choice of Supreme Court judges, yet the ethical issue of a democratic process in choosing these candidates increases the potential for political corruption. The legislature does not have the ability to prevent political…

    • 1265 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Noting Justice Scalia’s work on Constitutional interpretation, two competing approaches will be discussed. According to Justice Scalia, there are four approaches to Constitutional interpretation: Textualism, Strict Constructivism, Legislative intent, and Living Constitution. However, the most prominent approaches to Statutory and Constitutional interpretation are textualism and living Constitution. Justice Scalia makes a case for textualism. He explains in his essay “A Matter of Interpretation,” that textualism is the proper approach to interpreting the Constitution.…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Throughout our history, there has been a concurring question, in which the burden has weighed heavy the shoulders of many citizens. Should Supreme Court judges be elected or appointed? In the process of this debate, a main concern of the overall argument shadows the question that if today’s method of selection is constitutional and publicly acceptable. In order to keep the public content and still have a reliable court system, there are many factors that are taken into place, which is also one of the reasons why the answer to this question has yet to be justified. In addition, there is an equal amount of supporters on either side who each claim their position is the most ethical and reasonable choice.…

    • 2056 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays