Justice In Plato And Socrates

Improved Essays
O wise man, no matter how many times you try, you fall short of reaching the essence of justice. Your ignorance restrains you from seeing your virtues. If only you could remove your veil of ignorance, then you will come closer to true wisdom of Justice, but it seems that you are contented with the commodities of this world. Does this make you not wise, but a fool? Or is better to say that Justice is indefinable and unsolvable, and that is beyond human understanding? Plato and Socrates imparted their noble wisdom so that we were better off in life. If they would be still around, they would be disillusioned to see our state of deterioration. They endeavored us to be in harmony with our souls. Indeed, things, people, and ideas have changed, except …show more content…
This is vital in creating a successful society. In Plato’s Republic, Socrates, the wisest of all men, because he knows nothing, questions all men who thought to be wise. In his exploration, he encounters an unconscious society, oblivious to their surroundings, and that are governed by a false wisdom. This shows that knowledge gained through education will not always lead to righteousness, in fact, most of the time it will lead to tyranny and corruption. The elite groups are the ones who rule over the ordinary people. These rulers or guardians as Socrates calls them, have the responsibility to be Just and noble, instruct and look after the interest of the community. The problem is that wealth comes in the way, and the rulers are no longer capable of guiding righteously. Instead, they seek to become wealthier and powerful, and now a totalitarian government threatens the whole society. They were unyielding to the words of Socrates because their arrogance was much more pleasing. Why is then education vital as shown in the republic? Maybe, education is virtuous when is used selflessly, and beneficial when adopted by a …show more content…
According to Glaucon, another student of Socrates, we are not. “ No one is willingly just; men will be just only if constrained.” (P.56-d) Glaucon challenges the principles of Justice. His explanation of justice is powerful because it holds some truth. When we shun evil away is for the fear of punishment. When we help others is for a hope of a reward. Yet another argument is proposed by Thrasymachus, he states that, “justice is simply the interest of the stronger.” However, this is rapidly refuted and discredited by Socrates, because this principle makes Injustice superior to Justice; the stronger makes mistakes, and this deficiency makes it imperfect and ignorant. Thus this principle cannot be true because justice is superior in character and intelligence. When the stronger imposes self-interest, it is the duty of the people to overthrow the injustice. Glaucon’s powerful argument still stands and he extends his credibility when he mentions the myth of the ring of Gyges to illustrate his exact point. How visibility, a symbol of power, brings out one’s true intentions. In the story, Gyges, a shepherd boy, discovers a ring with invisibility powers, and not surprisingly he uses it for evil purposes. Still, Socrates holds on to the idea that we should pursue the intrinsic values, and that the best way to do so is by becoming

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    After Socrates, the protagonist in Plato’s Republic, refutes a description of justice similar to the traditional poetic view of justice made by a man named Cephalus, Thrasymachus, a well-known sophist, enters into the discussion of justice with Socrates. Thrasymachus asserts, “I proclaim that justice is nothing else than the interest of the stronger” (Plato, Republic I, 338 C). For Thrasymachus, justice is only revealed through the interests of the stronger party. Whatever the stronger party dictates as being good for itself, the stronger party, is what justice is. To further elaborate on his claim, Thrasymachus uses examples of cities governed by different ruling bodies. He explains that cities ruled by tyranny, democracy, aristocracy, or other forms of government create laws that are advantageous for its rulers; democracies establish democratic laws and the others follow the same pattern. By doing so, a ruling body declares what is just for its citizens is what is advantageous for itself, the ruling class, and punishes those who break the law. According to Thrasymachus, it is disadvantageous to live by the traditional standards of justice for justice represents the interests of the stronger and the interests of the stronger often are not advantageous to the…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    His main goal is to show the reader or his audience that it pays to be a just person even if the reward is not instant. In Socrates mind a just man is a philosopher king, who is essentially a smart thinker who does what is best for the community. When everyone follows this social order that Socrates proposes, it is possible for everyone to play their part and this gives way for the leaders to be philosopher kings who are the most intelligent thinkers. This ‘Kaliipolis’ is a city where the rulers crave knowledge, unlike a democracy where the ‘mob’ mentality rules causing the unfit to rule. He explains by stating, “Don’t understand that a little captain must pay attention to all seasons of the year, the sky, the star, to winds, and all that pertains to his craft, if he’s really to be the ruler of the ship” (Plato, 2004,448). In this passage he explains that the philosopher kings understand everything and specialization is key to a just city. When sailing a ship, the men choose the captain who is knowledgeable rather than the most important person or democratic way of choosing. This philosopher king must recognize good and bad and must “love wisdom”. To be virtuous and good, you must be knowledgeable which is just. Justice is keeping everyone in his or her place, which means there is a social order, which brings out the bets and most just in a person. This just person is happy doing what they are good at and helping the community. A sense of community is very significant in happiness for this beautiful city. Glaucon argues in Book II that injustice is almost a necessary evil to be successful in life. He tells the tale of the ring of Gyges, where a man is given a ring that makes him invisible. The story argues that if given this power why act justly when there are no repercussions. (Plato, Republic) This is when Socrates explains how specialization produces a need to be just for the…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While attempting to find the correct meaning of the word justice, Socrates refutes several of Thrasymachus's arguments pertaining to his personal perception of the definition. Furthermore, Socrates counters Thrasymachus's belief that one should be unjust, with the conviction that justice is a trait which one should possess. This particular area of the discussion shows a contrast between the ideas of Socrates and Thrasymachus regarding the term.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In his book, The Republic, Plato, a Greek philosopher, engages in conversation with his teacher Socrates. They come across the questions of “What is justice?” and “What is just?”. And throughout the first two books of the The Republic, many definitions of what justice is are thrown out by other philosophers, and Socrates always has an example to challenge each one. In the first book, three possible definitions are set out, and then in book two the argument of whether it is more profitable to be unjust or just is laid out.…

    • 1437 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Glaucon's View Of Justice

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Morality and justice are among the most important philosophical constructs that have continued to influence thinking, as well as approach to contemporary issues. Different philosophers have studied justice through definition, application in society, and the associated arguments. Socrates, for instance, argued that people prefer justice intrinsically because it has better promises and consequences than injustice. The Ring of Gyges is a critical review and challenge of Socrates’ version of justice, as put forward by Glaucon. Glaucon challenges Socrates’ view of justice from the perspective of whether justice is unavoidable in society or it is “good in itself.” This paper presents an analysis of Glaucon and Socrates views of justice, as well…

    • 1144 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this reading, Glaucon, a ‘just’ man and apprentice to Socrates, becomes disappointed with Thrasymachus’ abrupt and willingness in defeat. Glaucon, plays devil’s advocate and challenges his successor; Socrates, to a friendly debate. To start the debate of why the ‘just’ man is the best, rather than, ‘unjust’. Glaucon also discusses the best/worst life and how justice is a compromise. He describes the ‘best’ life; injustice, good by nature. Injustice is good by nature, because human beings…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates about justice? What does he think we are led to believe by thinking about the…

    • 1350 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Reason is key to achieve justice. First, one needs to be educated, which will cure their ignorance, they then will obtain knowledge of truth, and once one has both knowledge and truth, they then will have the key to reason, and only once reason is achieved they will have justice. Reason is what stops one from doing wrong, it teaches self-control. However throughout The Republic and Apology of Socrates, Reason itself falls into disrepute. Also, if people in the cave rule society, society itself will not be just because they will not have the knowledge in how they can rule a just society because they have been in a cave of ignorance. They do not have the means to actually rule a society because they only have one way of thinking and do not think…

    • 1440 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Following Socrates’ contention that Simonides would side with Cephalus and return a weapon to a madman, Polemarchus narrows his definition of justice, by claiming that justice is to give each what they deserve or is “appropriate to him.” Further, when prompted by Socrates, Polemarchus claims that medicine lends, or “gives medicine, food and health to bodies” (332c) and cooking gives seasoning to meat. Thus, Polemarchus comes to the conclusion that justice must give or “owe” what is good to friends and what is bad to enemies. Socrates then asks his interlocutor which profession or craft is most just in its treatment of others. He claims that, for example, a doctor will treat a sick patient with more skill than a just man, and conversely, be more adept at harming a patient, if he “deserves bad.” Polemarchus replies that justice is useful in war and peacetime only when it protects objects or money, otherwise a skillful man is preferred. Thus, Socrates concludes that if justice is a craft, it is “only useful for useless things,” such as watching money or a lyre. Furthermore, Polemarchus’ first premise, is critiqued by Plato on the grounds that (1) if justice is a craft, a more skilled individual is more equipped to “give what is owed” than a just one, and (2) that Polemarchus’ argument reduces justice to…

    • 1807 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thrasymachus Vs Socrates

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Socrates’ first refutation of Thrasymachus’ of justice definition is, “…it’s just to do not only what is advantageous for the stronger but also the opposite: what is not advantageous.” Although Socrates agrees with Thrasymachus that rulers can indeed make unadvantageous decisions, but it is still just that these decisions are followed, he finds a hole in his argument. In Thrasymachus’ definition of justice, he believes it is what is advantageous for the…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato asserts his position on justice throughout “The Republic.” His views constitute a model for how society should behave based on the values presented by Socrates in the dialogue. From Plato’s teachings we can infer that to establish justice, we must establish several principles in our lives including proper education, moderation, and courage. Although Plato describes how to live a just life through the metaphorical creation of a city, as opposed to focusing on the individual or going about the concept in a more abstract manner, he also asserts that justice is the quality of the soul, and a soul can only be pure if temptations are ignored.…

    • 1281 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Books II-IV of Plato’s Republic, Socrates creates an ideal polis, and in doing so finds justice in the soul. The two foundational principles of the ideal city that Socrates creates are self-sufficiency and one-person-one-art, referred to today as specialization. Individual people are not self-sufficient, so the citizens of the city must take up a profession and trade with each other. Socrates and his companions are successful in their search for justice, and are able to reach the answer by considering the classes and their education in an ideal state.…

    • 1869 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He means anything that a ruler thinks is good is justice. Rulers proceed ruling power to control and make laws for their cities; hence, what rulers think is just for people under their authority is justice. Therefore, if a person disobey any law he receives punishment for acting unjustly. Then Socrates shows humans are fallible, liable to make mistakes, and so are the rulers. Thrasymachus claims that a ruler to the extent he is a ruler does not make mistakes, so the ruler decides what is good for him and the subjects should carry out his order. Socrates exemplify with the art of medicine and shows that no one in authority considers his own benefits but the benefit of people under his authority. Thrasymachus objects with the example of shepherd’s concerns for his sheep with the aim of earning a living. Thereafter, they rephrase the outcome of justice benefits both the ruler and his followers.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Education, in the view of Plato, is what justice and happiness depend on. One must receive the proper education to be just and happy. Being just and happy rely on the education one receives, Plato shows this through Socrates and his suggestion to supervise the storytellers. By supervising the storytellers, it makes sure that the citizens in society are taught to act justly, which will lead to their happiness. Plato displays the importance of education through its relationship…

    • 1741 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In The Republic of Plato, Plato considers the nature and value of justice and the other virtues as they appear in both the structure of society as a whole and in the personality of an individual human being. This city-soul analogy supplies Plato with a metaphoric language that enables him to describe aspects of the structure and dynamics of the human soul. He began with a detailed analysis of the formation, structure, and organization of an ideal state before applying its results to a description of personal life. This paper will explore how the Republic uses the description of an ideal city-state as a vehicle for explaining the harmonious operation of the human psyche, which can be likened to a city. This “psychopolis” can be well or poorly…

    • 1482 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics