Justice And Injustice In Plato's The Republic

Improved Essays
In Book I of Plato’s, the Republic, the question is asked of what justice truly is. After Socrates has a long discussion, poking holes in the argument that justice is giving a man what he is owed, Thrasymachus bursts forward and offers a definition of justice that is contradictory in itself. Whereas I often presume justice to be what is equal and good, Thrasymachus argues that injustice is actually a virtue and justice, a vice, as injustice seems to benefit the doer as long as he or she goes unpunished. This mindset is a common one in the world, even though not everyone would admit to it. From corrupt politicians stealing money to high school students cheating on a math test, humans have always had the tenacity to cheat and steal. Thrasymachus’s

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    After Socrates, the protagonist in Plato’s Republic, refutes a description of justice similar to the traditional poetic view of justice made by a man named Cephalus, Thrasymachus, a well-known sophist, enters into the discussion of justice with Socrates. Thrasymachus asserts, “I proclaim that justice is nothing else than the interest of the stronger” (Plato, Republic I, 338 C). For Thrasymachus, justice is only revealed through the interests of the stronger party. Whatever the stronger party dictates as being good for itself, the stronger party, is what justice is. To further elaborate on his claim, Thrasymachus uses examples of cities governed by different ruling bodies.…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The idea is that rulers make the laws in their own best interests, and adherence to those laws is what constitutes justice for the individual. Socrates leaps at this opportunity to further his discussion on the subject of justice in book one: what it is, and whether or not it pays to be just. In this essay I will clarify Thrasymachus’…

    • 2199 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thucydides invokes that people are naturally animalistic and unjust by relating how persons turned to piracy and annihilated whole villages in order “to serve their own greed” (1.5). His depiction of early Greeks committing injustice is strikingly similar to Glaucon’s assertion that “doing injustice is naturally good” (358e). Thucydides and Glaucon conclude that human nature is nasty and brutish. While Thucydides argues that fighting amongst early Greeks “proved a fertile source of ruin” for themselves, Glaucon asserts that the worst misfortune a human can face is “suffering injustice without being able to avenge oneself” (1.2; 359a). Thus, without a requisite force countering the innate tendency for individuals to exploit other people to attain their selfish wants, both Thucydides and Glaucon concur people would continually have to suffer from…

    • 2067 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In his dialogue Crito, Plato discusses the idea of justice while writing about his former teacher and friend Socrates. Similar to his other works, Crito centers around Socrates, and his thoughts and philosophies. To truly understand what Plato was writing about in Crito is important to understand the reasons behind Socrates’ death sentence. Socrates was a man of thought, and much of the time there was both a lesson and a reason behind his actions. When Socrates first appeared on philosophical scene in Athens, philosophy was undergoing some big changes.…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In this speech, Thrasymachus tells him that he thinks about rulers differently than sheep or cattle and whether it is advantageous for them (343b). “You are so far from understanding justice and what is just, and injustice and what is unjust, that you do not realize that justice is really the good of another, what is advantageous for the stronger and ruler, and harmful to the one who obeys and serves (343c).” Next, the son of Cephalus says that “...injustice rules the simpleminded…” (343c5). A just man, to Thrasymachus always gets less than the unjust one (343d). He continues on to say that injustice is better than justice (344c5-8).…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    While attempting to find the correct meaning of the word justice, Socrates refutes several of Thrasymachus's arguments pertaining to his personal perception of the definition. Furthermore, Socrates counters Thrasymachus's belief that one should be unjust, with the conviction that justice is a trait which one should possess. This particular area of the discussion shows a contrast between the ideas of Socrates and Thrasymachus regarding the term. One of Thrasymachus's arguments that Socrates takes issue with is that in which he states that unjust rulers and cities are the strongest, making justice something that the less powerful and the unwise should aspire to obtain.…

    • 1161 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In the Republic, Thrasymachus defines justice as the advantage of the stronger. Socrates refutes this argument by proving that the stronger do not always make decisions to their advantage, that the stronger should not be making decisions that advantage them and that justice is more beneficial to the individual than injustice. In analyzing Thrasymachus’ definition of justice, there are aspects that need to be considered. Firstly, Thrasymachus talks about a group of people – the stronger.…

    • 2001 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Justice can have many meanings when put into different perspectives. Throughout Crito, by Plato, Socrates has to determine whether to escape prison or stay. Socrates was initially charged with corrupting the youth and not believing in gods. He argued his case in jury and did not choose the alternate punishment, exile, which could have saved his life. He was then given a death sentence and he was imprisoned until his execution.…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thrasymachus Vs Socrates

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In Thrasymachus’ definition of justice, he believes it is what is advantageous for the…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Definition Of Justice In Plato's Republic

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited

    Socrates expresses that,“…is it because of the spirited part…that we call a single individual courageous (Plato 99).” It can be found if one has courage in the spirited part. In the state, the soldiers represent courage. They fight and defend for their city.…

    • 954 Words
    • 4 Pages
    • 1 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The switch to the discussion of profitability changes the scale in which justice is analyzed from justice as an overarching concept to an individual in action. From his view, justice has a key role in society but for an individual it is more profitable to be unjust. As a moral skeptic, Thrasymachus doesn’t believe justice to hold an intrinsic good. For an…

    • 447 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the Republic, Plato discusses and relates the three topics that are central to one lives, education, justice, and happiness. Through his definitions of these three topics, he considers how a society can achieve the proper education, justice, and happiness leading to his understanding of human nature. Plato addresses the close relation between being just and happy to the education received in society. The relationship between education, justice, and happiness depends on Plato’s understanding of these topics. Specifically with the relations of justice and happiness, the relationship is just as much dependent on the true sense of the idea as it is with Socrates rejection of the false claims.…

    • 1741 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    In Plato’s ‘Republic’, happiness and justice are deeply questioned and analyzed as being interconnected. The broadest assumption of a happy person is one who is most wealthy and with very much power. This is almost an unspoken truth, however, does it really work out? One of the most famous Greek philosophers was Socrates, a son of a stonemason who encouraged discussion among many elite, powerful men. In the Republic written by Plato, the idea of a happy person is dissected thoroughly by Socrates and explained.…

    • 1622 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In Plato’s Republic, the images of justice are perceived differently between several characters in this novel. Cephalus, Polemarchus, and Thrasymachus, all present contrasting ideals of justice compared to the one envisioned by Socrates. Using the art of rhetoric, Socrates utilizes argumentation to identify the faults in each individual’s vision of justice, and how his unconventional perception of justices can change their entire society. The first vision of justice discussed in The Republic was Cephalus. Cephalus describes justice as honesty.…

    • 1361 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As seen throughout Plato’s Republic, Plato trusts that justice is important for the individuals who are just. We have likewise observed that Plato does not imagine that justice is great exclusively for its outcomes. It is additionally great in itself, an innate good. He demonstrates this by asserting that justice is a part of the happy life. In the event that the ethics were just a significance to happiness, then they may neglect to cause happiness in different conditions, and one may have the capacity to accomplish happiness with essentially the presence of morality.…

    • 1066 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays