Just And Unjust Essay

Improved Essays
In the United States of America, the founding fathers developed several laws to ensure that society maintains peace and order, where every person is free to pursue their “American dream”. In order to maintain peace in this society, every person must obey all the laws that are put in place. Although some people may find some laws “unjust”, it is up to those people to take the necessary legal action to change it; not to obey those laws they agree with and disobey those they don’t. Since many people have different definitions of what is just and unjust, such as whether a woman has the right to an abortion or not, people need to challenge their legal system to make change. Some may argue that disobeying and resisting “unjust” laws may be the only necessary step, however, if people used that action against any law they deemed as “unjust”, society would be in chaos. Ultimately, individuals in society need to follow the laws put in place, and take necessary legal action to refute those laws they feel infringes their rights as a citizen. If people where to disobey or resist any law they found “unjust”, society wouldn’t be stable. If a criminal believed that stealing is “unjust”, they could disobey or resist that law and engage in illegal behavior. This can cause …show more content…
For example, unlike equal rights for everyone (which is a right in the declaration of independence), a women’s right choose to have an abortion is a debated topic across the United States. Those who believe women have the right to chose may believe that having a state decide whether a woman can have an abortion is an “unjust” law, but others may believe that it is a “just” law. Since this topic is split among the masses, it is left the individual to take legal action to fight for what they believe. In the court case, Roe vs Wade, a woman fought for her right to have an abortion. The Supreme Court sided with her, making an unjust law,

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    Unjust laws are created by humans and don’t have roots with natural laws (King, 3). They degrade the human personality and damage our souls. Unjust laws provides a false sense of superiority to some and inferiority to others. (21) King concludes that when an individual breaks an unjust law and accepts the punishment they are really showing the highest respect for law. Since unjust laws aim to dehumanize some they should not be seen as laws at all.…

    • 1569 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Saying all segregating laws is “unjust” because it destroys a person’s soul and personality. It can give the segregator the false sense of empowerment…

    • 1367 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws” (King, 85). In King’s eyes, an unjust law is any law that is degrading towards any human regardless of race, gender, or class. He views sticking up for those who are oppressed by the unjust law, even if it means breaking said law, as the right thing to do. King does not want to see black people being treated as less than human as a result of individuals being afraid to fight against unjust laws, so he encourages the peaceful protests and demonstrations that disobey these laws.…

    • 927 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this next section Martin Luther King Jr. makes the argument that some laws meant to be broken; to do so he, defines just and unjust laws and also provides proper examples. King defines just law as “a man-made code that squares with the moral law;” it is a law that is equally upheld by both majority and minority groups (804). He goes on to define unjust laws as “any law that degrades human personality” (804). By accurately defining the difference between just and unjust laws, it sets up the tone for his argument on why it is acceptable to support some laws and disobey others. He wishes to convey the idea that just because a law is put in place by a government, that does not always deem them reasonable and without corruption.…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “One who breaks an unjust law must do so openly, lovingly, and with a willingness to accept the penalty” -Martin Luther King Jr. Martin Luther King Jr. argues in “Letter from a Birmingham Jail” that it is our duty to break a law if it is unfair. King advocates disobeying a country’s prejudice laws in order to avoid immorality. Similarly, Henry David Thoreau argues in “Civil Disobedience” that if a law requires a person to be unjust to another, they should break it.…

    • 1010 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Respecting unjust laws means that you are willing to accept the punishment. Following unjust laws, simply makes you part of the problem. Most people, wishing to maintain the status quo, will most likely say to just follow the law, or to wait for a “better time” to change them. One need only remember that all the atrocities committed by Hitler were legal, and the people pacifly went along with it, believing that such things were necessary to save the country in its greatest time of need. Nearly 12 million people died as a result of a lack of civil disobedience.…

    • 593 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Former president of the United States, Thomas Jefferson, once said, “If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so.” Wholeheartedly, I stand in affirmation that peaceful resistance to laws positively impacts a free society, if peaceful resistance were still to exist. Unfortunately, it does not.…

    • 645 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Anyone can recognize when a law is unjust - but can they be brave enough to face the consequences if they choose to protest that law? Should they? Henry David Thoreau, “Civil Disobedience” critiques that citizens must protest a law that is unjust, and his own experiences and methods for protest, and Martin Luther King Jr’s “Letter from Birmingham Jail” where he speaks of his approach to protesting against unjust laws, even if it lands him in jail. Both philosophers regarding on their answers on this question shows that they are both willing to protest and face the consequences for it, but they differ in their ideas of solutions. King’s perspective on breaking unjust laws is that it is necessary to do it to give an oppressed group the opportunity…

    • 325 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Arc Of Justice Essay

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages

    "Law is not law, if it violates the principles of eternal justice." - Lydia Child. The rule of law attests to the idea that the people are to be protected by these very principles. Unfortunately, throughout the world there've been earmarks of injustice from police brutality in the US to the marginalization of women in Afghanistan. Hence, the very reason I want to become a lawyer - to end these perversions.…

    • 623 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Sometimes, by exercising the rights expressed in the Bill of Rights, people may end up breaking the law. Breaking the law, as seen in the Civil Rights Movement, can lead to positive change. However, it is unacceptable to disobey the law to the point that ends up causing harm to others. Martin Luther King Jr. once said, “Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.”…

    • 791 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Individuals have rights that are extracted from the law of god or moral laws. It is the duty of individuals in democratic society to follow the laws of the land, if they are just. It’s an overstatement to think the government doesn’t create unjust laws. When faced with an unjust law, a decision has to be made by possibly resorting to deceptive practices. There must be the courage to disobey any unjust law and discharge it as a moral…

    • 653 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As a law abiding citizen growing up in the world today, I personally don't agree with breaking the law. However, if I am defending myself because I'm getting robbed, beaten, or raped I feel that it would be justified. However, it would be up to a judge and jury to decide my innocence. My parents raised to believe wrong is wrong and right is right. My parents taught me, "If you can do the crime you can do the time.…

    • 582 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    . “America incarcerates more people than any other country on Earth,” argues Shane Smith. Seventy-five percent of people arrested for nonviolent drug charges are blacks and Hispanics. For minorities the system is broken because the system is biased to them. The justice system is supposed to be innocent until proven guilty, but for Latinos and blacks the system is guilty until proven innocent.…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    It is justified to break the law, particularly when the law being broken is unjust and immoral. An example of unjust and corrupt laws is the laws made in Nazi Germany. (King, 4) Plenty of these laws obliged people to report Jews for them to be terminated from Society. To oppose and break Nazi’s manmade law and help the Jews would be the moral and right thing to do. As a result, I assume that the only answer to the question of when is it justifiable to break a law is when that law violates more fundamental laws that maintain key human rights.…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Injustice in the Justice System Conflict places an immense strain on society. A person faces a constant battle with conflict everyday. They deal internal with conflict, where inner controls are tested. They deal with conflict within a social group and where outer controls are challenged.…

    • 869 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays