John Stuart Mill Utilitarianism Essay

Improved Essays
John Stuart Mill is considered one of the most notorious philosopher in the late nineteen century who on morality grounds defended the idea of utilitarianism. Mill constructively argued that being cultured is what was the soul to happiness and if one' was to keep happiness on the highest level of morality then it would lead to higher goals and ambitions. Mill's explained the relation between how pigs and humans evaluated behavior in a philosophical manner, he was content with the idea that a highly cultured individual characterized a more happier person because he believed that a person who strived for higher values and seeks pleasure within life follows a more blissful lifestyle. On the other hand, principles that were not cultivated by means …show more content…
Essentially, Mill's thought that critics had overlooked the meaning behind pleasure and the distinguishing elements between the pleasures of human beings and animals. "Human beings have faculties more elevated than the animal appetites, and when once made conscious of them, do not regard anything as happiness which does not include their gratification the pleasures of the intellect, of the feelings and imagination, and of the moral sentiments, a much higher value as pleasures than to those of mere sensation" (from Module 11 J.S Mill Excerpt). In this sense, human pleasures are more superior than pleasures of animals and once faculties of intellect and feelings are set into motion, happiness gradually takes place. Mills also states that it is likely that some pleasure is more valuable than the other but the consequences of one's action is what will help us as individuals distinguish higher and lower

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill and Aristotle spent a lot of time defining and talking about happiness and how virtue can make one happy and also be a means to our end. According to Aristotle, virtue comes from practicing habit and good upbringing. In the society today, people think happiness is all about money and fame, but Aristotle believes that virtue is the one thing that can bring us happiness. According to Mill, he doesn’t agree that virtue is the end or rather the principal thing that makes us happy, rather Mill believes that pleasure is what brings happiness and also freedom from pain (Mill). He has a very different idea from Aristotle.…

    • 191 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It is believed that it is too strict a requirement for Utilitarianism to imply that we should always act solely to maximize happiness. It is then asking too much of people to be always centrally focused on promoting happiness for the general human population. Mill responds to such criticism by stating that “…no system of ethics requires that the sole motive of all we do shall be a feeling of duty,” but rather that “utilitarian moralists have gone beyond almost everyone in asserting that the motive has nothing to do with the morality of the action though it has much to do with the worth of the agent.” (13) This therefore, asserts that the motives behind an action will have nothing to do with whether or not we should complete an action solely based on its morality. He states that the great majority of these good actions are intended not for the benefit of the world, but for that of its…

    • 1497 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    John Stuart Mill—a philosopher whom believed that another name for utility is the greatest form of happiness, a principal lead by the clause “Actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. By happiness are intended pleasure, and the absence of pain; by unhappiness, pain, and the privation of pleasure”. With this, Mill presents the concept of utility as a stem from the presence of pleasure and the absence of pain within basic desires. According to Mill, the more valuable a pleasure becomes, the more of likelihood that an individual will employ higher faculties. Mill often juxtaposes human values of pleasure with that of pain.…

    • 1205 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    “Against this doctrine, however, arises another class of objectors, who say that happiness, in any form, cannot be the rational purpose of human life and action; because, in the first place, it is unattainable: and they contemptuously ask, What right hast thou to be happy?” (EEW p.234) Nevertheless, he was willing to prove them wrong and continued to defend utilitarianism. Mill replies that it is an exaggeration to claim that humans cannot experience happiness. He insists that happiness is possible in those who have experienced a few pains in their life and this could be an attainable life for almost everyone if academic and social reputations change for the better to cultivate the proper values.…

    • 1260 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    These actions of sex, money, or even taking a nice cold dip in a pool on a hot summer day; although would make me feel happy, meet the standard for my physical pleasures, because they make me happy. For at least the moment in which I’m fulfilling these actions, “but such feelings are not the same thing of happiness,” (FE, 24). Instead Mill believed that my pleasures that I endure in life should be attitudinal pleasures, which is “the positive attitude of positive enjoyment,” (FE,24). Mill’s believes that there are two kinds of pleasures that one can…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Perhaps it is the sensitivity we have to a higher purpose of life that makes higher order actions more pleasurable in the quality of pleasure they create and the long-lasting nature of this said pleasure. A question that arises here, is that how can this ideology be hedonism when it goes against a basic assumption. In hedonism, there is acceptance of the idea that the only way a pleasure is better than another pleasure is by it being more pleasurable. Whereas Mill has added the idea of higher and lower faculties to this.…

    • 1387 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill defines utilitarianism as “actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness,” (484) He then begins to explain that happiness is the absence of pain, and pain is the absence of pleasure. He refers to utilitarianism as the Greatest Happiness Principle. Many people that disagreed with Mill’s definition of utilitarianism insulted his work by stating it as a “doctrine worthy only of swine,” (Mill 485). Mill responds to this attack by stating “...for if the sources of pleasure were precisely the same to human beings and to swine, the rule of which is good enough for the one would be good enough for the other,” (Mill 485). Mill responds to this insult by comparing human…

    • 714 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Since Mill is a utilitarian his morals are pretty concise and do not have leeway. The focus of utilitarianism is now happiness and where that emanates from…

    • 1435 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill questions the validity of the core doctrine of the utilitarianism, which holds that "actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. " In his philosophical inquiry, he strives to define what defines the ultimate happiness and pleasure. Contrary to Bentham, the proponent of the classical utilitarianism, who believes that all sources of pleasure are equal in value, Mill asserts that the quality of pleasure is a major factor in deciding what would be the best course of actions. Mill differentiates various types of pleasure inherent to the humankind, identifying physical satisfaction from fulfilling vital needs, aesthetic enjoyment of the surrounding beauty, and intellectual pleasures or sense of accomplishment.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Happiness is pleasure and the absence of pain versus unhappiness which is pain and the absences of pleasure. Mill thinks pleasures and happiness are the same. If something brings you pleasure, then you are happy. Just as if you are happy something has brought you pleasure. Take for example food, it is only desired to stop and/or prevent hunger which brings happiness to the person starving.…

    • 1146 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    James Mill Utilitarianism

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Problem o The problem at hand relates to the topic of CBD-only medical marijuana items being introduced to Georgia. o These products help patients with a wide variety of diseases and disorders such as ALS, seizures, cancer, and many more. o The problem at hand lies not in how the products affect people, but how the products get to the people who need them.…

    • 1624 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Mill believes that true happiness should be rational or ethical in nature. Physical happiness does not count as true happiness. Sometimes the pursuit of happiness or of human pleasures may result in pain as a result of sacrifices we consciously make.…

    • 1542 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The recent events below have led to a series of protests over the past year but recently in the media the public has been advocating for the rights of African Americans in America based off of the neglect of the justice system for these young black men. These situations were all against young black males that had absolutely no reason to be murdered as a means to a solution. As these three situations only stand as representations of the many black male to be victimized by the police system in America it also shows us that although we have made strides in race relations and equality we still have a very long and tiring journey to go to be fully accepted by our fellow counterpart. Laquan McDonald was shot 16 times by a Chicago…

    • 1055 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mill believes that ethics are measured based on the consequences of individual deeds and also in consequentialism, or utilitarianism, which is the doctrine that decides what actions are right and if they are useful or for the benefit of a majority. Utilitarianism never really relies on ill-defined instinct or intellectual principles, but it allows philosophers as well as psychologists to determine what makes people happy and which policies promote the social “good”. In order for Utilitarianism to work appropriately, the interests of each individual is required and each individual 's interest must be thought of equally. Mill uses the “Quantity/Quality” distinction to be able to tell which pleasure is most desired. For example, Qualitative pleasure in a small amount are more important than a Quantitative pleasure in a larger amount and a small qualitative issue is more important than a large quantitative issue.…

    • 1664 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Mill bases his theory in human psychology, saying that desire is universal regardless of one’s religious convictions. He also recognizes that human pleasures differ in quality, not just quantity (Clark & Poortenga, 2003). Mill believed that human higher desires are those of reason and intellect while the lower desires are based on our immediate and biological needs and wants. Mill found that it is impossible to quantify lower desires because they are innate and natural. Some strengths of qualitative utilitarianism are that it does take into account natural human desires and gives them weight in order to help make an ethical decision (Wilkens, 2011).…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays