John Milton 's Paradise Lost Essay

1901 Words Apr 23rd, 2015 null Page
John Milton’s Paradise Lost featured a misinterpretation of hierarchy in the monarchy. Milton condemned King Charles I for following the “Divine Right of Kings” doctrine, stating that monarchy is subject to no earthly authority directly of the authority of God; in other words, God chooses a king. However, Milton disagreed, arguing that the king is a servant to God in order to bond communities together. He connected this theory with fall of Satan, who criticized God’s hierarchy as unfair. Consequently, God sent Satan Hell; in addition, Satan refused to repent, objectively breaking the unity between God and humans. In addition, he tempted Adam and Eve in order to take away the Paradise he already had lost. In contrast, Joel and Ethan Cohen’s No Country for Old Men discussed with the domino effect of men’s action and fate. The movie questioned its viewers about men’s choices; Anton followed a moral code to determine humans’ fate while Llewellyn Moss makes decision, leading him to perish. Relationally, these two mediums contrast the motives between the quintessential hero and tragic hero. The quintessential hero follows one moral code and progressively strives to achieve his goals; the tragic hero chooses different moral codes in certain situations, unknowingly accepting the consequences of his actions. Thus, the relationship between John Milton 's Paradise Lost and Joel Cohen 's No Country for Old Men is that the quintessential hero 's objective moral redefines the fate of…

Related Documents