Monarch And The Old Oligarch Analysis

Great Essays
Thucydides’ portrait of Perikles (TPOP) believes that the common populace are just as good as anyone else, if not more so, because they work hard and as humans are equal and just. The Old Oligarch believes that the kakos are inherently lesser and are bad and that the agathos are by nature are better people and are more qualified for running the city. Thus, the difference in perceptions of democracy between the Old Oligarch and Thucydides’ portrait of Perikles arises from their different views of social class and their inherent qualities of worth and honor.
One of the points that TPOP and the Old Oligarch disagree on is their different stances on what defines worth and honor, and thus who is worthy and honorable. TPOP believes that worth and
…show more content…
TPOP implies that the citizens in general are good for making decisions. TPOP mentions that Athenians are “able to judge at all events” (Thucydides 2.40). The ability to judge, then, is important in those that lead Athens. “Ordinary citizens” are “still fair judges of public matters” regardless of whether or not they are “occupied with the pursuits of industry” (Thucydides 2.40). Therefore, TPOP believes that the ability to judge is an important trait in the leaders of Athens, regardless of social class and wealth. TPOP also states that “merit as a citizen” is an important trait that also impacts a person’s worth (Thucydides 2.42). This in turn affects the “character of our country” so merit as a citizen is desirable in the leaders of the city. Not only that, but TPOP also states that “merit as a citizen more than outweighed his demerits as an individual” (Thucydides 2.42). Thus, as long as a person has merit as a citizen and can serve Athens well, it does not matter what he is as a citizen. This applies to social class as well, since it would potentially be a “demerit as an individual,” especially in the Old Oligarch’s eyes. The Old Oligarch does not think that ____ are desirable qualities for the decision-makers of the city. [BLAH BLAH OO …show more content…
TPOP states that under the people and the current form of government Athens became great. Democracy, led by the populace, is “the form of government under which our greatness grew” (Thucydides 2.36). He also says that under democracy and the people “the mother country has been furnished… with everything that can enable her to depend on her own resources whether for war or for peace” implying that the citizens have brought about a change for the better (Thucydides 2.36). Thus TPOP thinks that the demos are good for Athens and have made it a better place. Conversely, the Old Oligarch thinks that the demos do not contribute as many benefits to Athens compared to the agathos. He says, satirically, that the common people are “the ones who impart strength to the city far more than the hoplites, the high-born, and the good men” (Pseudo-Xenophon I.2). As satire, the Old Oligarch’s writing really means to convey the opposite—he really actually means that the high-born are better for the city, and that the common people are not and thus should not be contributing to the government the way they do in a democracy. Putting these people in charge demotes the people who, to the Old Oligarch, are better contributors and leaders. Thus, TPOP believes that democracy is good because the people have been able to

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Emerging from the latter half of the 5th century BCE, travelling professional intellectuals called the sophists frequented Athens and the surrounding Greek city-states. These intellectuals would offer an education in “arête” (excellence) – to those who would be able to pay a small fee. Arête, during the second half of the fifth century BCE, was associated by Greek citizens with being successfully influential in the political sphere through persuasive speech whereas before then arête was primarily associated with heroic virtues exemplified by Greek heroes like Achilles and Odysseus. Since the sophists were able to provide an education in arête in exchange for a fee, they would later be called “the new ‘teachers’ of 5th-century Athens” (Griffin…

    • 1179 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I personally think that Athens is not represented as democratic. There were aspects that were considered democratic but there were also aspects that were considered oligarchy. The word democracy means “government by the people.” But in Athens, “Demokratia” was rule by male citizens only, excluding women, free foreigners, and slaves. The people performed rule candidly, however democracy today means rule by the representatives of the people.…

    • 226 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Roman Citizenship Dbq

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Do you know that people are citizens of the state empire? is not only being a citizen of meeting the certain the responsibility. You just got to be a good citizen and they elected pairs to be in group they did it for all the distract classes. Around 500 BCE, Athens and Rome were found in Mediterranean region. Rome and Athens both had different systems of citizenship, but one was better than the other.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    This passage was written by Herodotus and is found in his work Histories 3.80. In the passage, a character named Otanes is arguing against monarchy and proposing that the Persions adopt a democratic government. He outlines a variety of issues concerning monarchy and explains how democracy creates equality while preventing problems associated with one ruler. Although democracy didn’t exist until 508 BC, after the time period in which this text is placed, we can still compare the ancient and modern ideas of democracy. We can explore Otanes’s reasons against monarchy and learn why it may not exist in modern society.…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Greek Contributions Dbq

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As for social standing, advancement is open to everyone, according to ability. While every citizen has equal opportunity to serve the public, we reward our most distinguished citizens by asking them to make our political decisions. Nor do we discriminate against the poor. A man may serve his country no matter how low his position on the social scale" (Document 3). Pericles was describing a democracy where everyone had the same chance to help serve their country but everyone is expected to participate in civic affairs in this type of government regardless of their position on the social scale.…

    • 617 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although Athens was ruled by tyrants for many years, Cleisthenes was able to break that chain through his unique way of thinking. Cleisthenes believed that relief of oppression by the government, prevention of tyranny, and people’s participation and contribution to the community were essential in the process of turning a corrupted Greek government system into a democratic society. Cleisthenes was raised to be an aristocrat, but he did not think like the rest. Athenian people suffered under the rule of tyrant leaders, people’s economic conditions dropped constantly. During Hippias’ ruling period, Cleisthenes observed how the Athenian government used its power unjustly and oppressively against its own people.…

    • 566 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Historically, it seems as if the Athenians believed in giving chances to people in order to join their civilization, which in return shows the connection to, democracy. By the people, for the people. It is an invalid statement, for someone to say that the Athenians were wrong in the aspect of fairness for all of Athens citizens. The Athenian’s government had consisted of a civilian voted government, voted laws that give equal justice to all, and the ability to allow foreigners to become citizens. They took all the right precautions to achieving pure democracy throughout Athens.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Ancient Athens Dbq

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages

    We can't go and ask them so we depend on historians to tell us more about them. The historians are the ones who can make a difference. Historians need to realize that ancient Athens was not truly democratic because of the percent of the population that could vote, the fact that if someone did not do what the higher people wanted they could be punished, and the different levels of government. In a true democracy everyone has a say in everything but in Ancient Athens that was not the case.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Was ancient Athens truly democratic ? To say about how Athens was more of a democratic civilization, it was not because of how most things that certain people are allowed to do in the city it was because there was not much laws and our order between one another. but between the democracy and the city of Athens it was not so secure about their laws or order because of how most people were citizens at some weren’t because of how they were born in the city with their parent but their parents came to Athens as uncivilized people. But in order to be a citizen there in Athens you would have to be born there and also your parents to be from there as also to be able to have law and order in the population of the city. Also as of how men had more…

    • 407 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kallipolis is a perfectly structured society in which justice is achieved at the social and interpersonal realms. It is ruled by a philosopher king, who maintain the peace and harmony in the ideal society. According to Plato in The Republic, the philosopher king possesses the qualities to be the rightful king to rule in Kallipolis. Philosophers are qualified to rule because they have a understanding of the Forms or the truth, their wisdom allows them to understand justice and their knowledge makes them superior than others. However, a philosopher can be a tyrant in disguise.…

    • 1641 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Direct Democracy Dbq

    • 105 Words
    • 1 Pages

    The Athenian government was a direct democracy, meaning the citizens of the city-state had a say in the decisions they made. Although the government was based on direct democracy, only adult males could vote. The Athenians had the power to change anything in their government due to having direct democracy. This could take a turn at any time since it was a direct democracy, which could lead to some people cheating the vote. In Athens, they valued the individual over the group.…

    • 105 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Not only did it have value itself but it produced grain, at the time there was no coin so grain was used for trade. (Trumbach) There were four basic classes of people at the time. The aristocrats who owned a lot of fertile land. Second is the “rich peasants” who owned smaller amounts of land but the land was also of poor yield, the mostly lived on the hill. Though they are richer than the other peasants they were still poor.…

    • 1679 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates Is Guilty Essay

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages

    And while it may be true that Socrates is skeptical of democracy, his criticisms are true: democracy has substantial weaknesses, and he does right by pointing them out. Athens has lost a war, which is proof that the democracy has terribly failed. In the past year, Athens has witnessed a bloody civil war between the oligarchs and the democrats, showing the weaknesses of each Faction (Carnes, M. C., & Ober, J. (2004)). Now is the time for a true revolution,…

    • 513 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Question: Compare and contrast monarchy, aristocracy, tyranny, oligarchy, and democracy as forms of government in Ancient Greek city-states. Democracy Democracy is a form of government in which the people have a voice in the exercise of power, typically through elected representatives (Oxford Dictionary). Athens’ constitution is called a democracy because it allows the interests of all people in the system of government not just minority. We have known that the democratic system of government is governed by the people so it has the most government officials chosen by lottery and served the people for a year.…

    • 743 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Aristotle and Plato’s World View on Democracy In this essay I will explore the views of democracy and the education of the people and reasons why Aristotle had a favorable view on it more than Plato did. In relation, Aristotle and Plato were great thinkers far beyond their time in philosophy. However, they had two very different world views on democracy and oligarchy.…

    • 1354 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays