Expansion Of Slavery

Improved Essays
Between the years 1846 to 1861, the United States government was in a constant argument over the idea of the expansion of slavery. The southern politicians perceived the decisions made by Congress a retaliation against the southern need to expand slavery, so their economy does not collapse due to soil degradation. The north saw the tactics used by the south as rebellious to the American form of government. Northern politicians believed the south was trying to take over the government by nationalizing slavery and corrupting the government itself. Both the southern and northern politicians began to use their passion to validate their fears about the other party. The south claimed that the north was being aggressive and inhibiting the growth …show more content…
The question of whether the south would be able to have one of the states as a slave state arose, and caused a lot of tension. The northerners said that the lands of Kansas or Nebraska would not be healthy enough to sustain a plantation. While the southerners, said that expanding slavery would help the economy and the social tensions. During this time period in the south, a lot of slave insurrections took place. As a result, plantation owners began to think spreading the slaves out would decrease the rebellious atmosphere. The Kansas-Nebraska act stated that the Missouri Compromise had to be repealed because it did not give the southern portion of the United States enough or equal opportunity compared to the north. This act can be linked as one of the main factors in the creating of the civil war and national sectionalism amongst the north and the south. Sectional division in the Kansas and Nebraska territories began to boil over when anti-slavery sentiments dominated the land. People like Eli Turner wanted to ensure that slavery would not be spread beyond the south. Turner thought by convincing northerners to move to the west and settle there would be a common abolitionist atmosphere. Once the south caught wind of Eli Turner’s plan, they began to have southerners live in Kansas, to have an established pro-slavery population. The clashing ideologies of the area left it in constant warfare over land and beliefs. All of the differing ideologies led to Bleeding Kansas. Bleeding Kansas, through the eyes of the south, was seen as something to unfairly shut out slavery from the rest of the United States and a direct attack on the stability of the southern culture. Northerners remained settled on the notion that plantation life would not be sustainable, so the southerners should keep slaves in the south. Both regional ideologies led to non-stop fighting

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In effect, there were small-scale wars through these territories between pro-slave and abolitionist factions, which incited an increasingly militaristic view of a coming war. Southerners were concerned that abolitionists would sabotage new slave settlements in the west, which increased hostilities between the north and the South. In this manner, the rationale for a southern Confederacy became a more realistic goal, since the federal government was essentially making it a “first-come/first-serve” style of territorial expansion. This only encouraged a feeling of distrust of southerners for abolitionists, which galvanized a more aggressive militaristic position, especially in the context of secessionist ideology. Therefore, abolitionist sabotage and militarism was a primary catalyst for the southern secessionist movement, since it appeared that the northern federalist government was not willing to provide a means of balancing the issue of slave and free state sovereignty.…

    • 727 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Republican Party Formation

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Lincoln said that “the result would be slavery or no slavery” (Lincoln, “House Divided”). This was a wakeup call for both the South and North for the next president could be the determination of the progression of slavery. The realization that the answer had to be one or the other made each side more violent to get the outcome that they wanted. Douglas’ continuous use of ad hominem was affective when he stated that “Lincoln was pro-slave equality” (The Rise of the Republican Party). This made the South ever so anger for they did not already agree on the idea of ending slavery so let alone the citizenship of African Americans.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The south tried to say that slaves were happy, but educated, heartfelt attacks on slavery written by people like escaped-slave Frederick Douglass said otherwise. The treatment of slaves varied depending on the owner, but families of slaves being separated and punishments like whipping was common. Though the war may have started as a way to preserve the Union which was breaking after the election of an anti-slavery President, Abraham Lincoln, it turned into a war that would decide the fate of slavery (“Slavery in the United States” 2014). The desire for change is what caused the civil war. The people of the northern states recognized that slavery should not be legal while the southern states wanted to expand slavery to the west.…

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the novel, the author concentrates on the South and their reasons for rebelling against the Union. One reason that is argued in this paper is that the South rebelled because they believed that the Union was infringing on their rights as a state and was contradicting the constitution. Through this argument, the Confederacy orchestrated a plan to appeal to the lower class and spur the nation toward war. Another argument made in the paper is that Abraham Lincoln didn 't pursue the eradication of slavery, but wanted to stop the progression of slavery in the South to eventually weed out the institution of slavery. These arguments are made through the reading of the novel.…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The tide of sentiment southerns carried towards their “Southern way of life” changed around 1831. Instead of offering apologies in response to the system of slavery, which in the past they described as a “necessary evil” forced upon them, the South instead started a vehement defense of their practices. The protective feeling over the southern lifestyle was an outcome of a decade of calls for the immediate abolition of slaves, the horrid accounts of slave mistreatment, and uprisings from the slave population. From many angles the south was receiving the message that they were immoral and times were changing. This insulted their self belief of benevolence and “Paternalism,” while simultaneously insinuating their Agrarian lifestyle was less worthy…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Northerners wanted to abolish it but Southerners on the other hand, strongly agreed to slavery. They felt that slavery was making America prosper, so why should they stop? The South was making money from selling cotton that the slaves picked but the people up North didn’t like the way slave owners were making money from African Americans being enslaved. When Abraham Lincoln became president, the South felt that their right being a slave state was in danger. Their differences on slavery caused the Civil War.…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Social Changes

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages

    While, “Northerners believed that slavery would escape from Dixie and corrupt and possibly break down the political and constitutional system” (xxiv). The nation was divided into two political parties, Democrats and the Republicans. The Republicans sought to end slavery, while the Democrats opposed to this idea. Slavery has torn the two political parties apart. The election of Abraham Lincoln, a member of the Republican party, had significantly pushed the start of the war, because the South took this election as a…

    • 759 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Civil War Slavery Causes

    • 1998 Words
    • 8 Pages

    However, after the Civil War, Southerner leaders, Neo-Confederates and some revisionists historians downplayed the importance of slavery as the main cause of the Civil War. Instead these critics have surmised that a multitude of causes centered around various social and economic sectional differences as well as state’s rights theories that eventually lead to war. Regardless of these claims, the preservation of slavery and white superiority are ultimately the underlying lynch pins at the core of these theories that economic, political or social differences were the causes of the Civil War. Moreover, to ensure Southern secession, Southern leaders protected this racially motivated system by spreading fear of racial equality, war between the races and amalgamation of the races at the hands of Northerners who opposed slavery. Southern leaders later deflected their attempts to maintain their race based social and economic hierarchy with theories of states’ rights and sectional differences after their defeat in the Civil…

    • 1998 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Long-Term Effects Of Slavery

    • 2279 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Americans could no longer continue its journey as a nation half slave and half free. Northerners and Southerners were always interpreting any incident or piece of legislation as an attempt by one side to gain moral and political advantage at the others expense. The northerners viewed the Dredd Scott decision, the Lecompton Constitution, and the southern reaction to John Brown’s raid as evidence of a Slave Power conspiracy to deny white northerners their constitutional rights, while the southerners interpreted the northern reaction to these same events as evidence of conspiracy to rob them of security and equality within the Union. For more that seventy years, statesmen had found compromises that accepted slavery and preserved the Union. As each section grew increasingly committed to its labor system and the promise it offered, Americans realized that accommodations had its limits.…

    • 2279 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Civil War Dbq Essay

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The existence of slavery was the key component that initiated tensions between the North and South; if there were no disagreements over slavery, the Civil War could have been avoidable. With the contrast of an industrial and agricultural economy, the South felt threatened by the balance of power between the two regions. Because the South felt that slavery was crucial to their economic stability, succession felt inevitable to them. Moreover, Southern politicians and Northern abolitionists further aggravated the division of the two regions by exposing sectionalist beliefs to the mainstream that would otherwise have been ignored. Because slavery underlined the South’s desire to seek independence, state rights, and ultimately the continuation of southern culture, the succession was inevitable.…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays