The Missouri Compromise Essay

Great Essays
In the years prior to the American Civil War, Congress created, passed, and dismissed dozens of compromises to diminish sectional tensions created by opposing slavery beliefs. During April 1861, the agreements created by the United States government began to display their repercussions. These repercussions were caused by the unhappiness created by the compromises and because of the unsatisfying conditions, many Southern states, including states such as Georgia, Florida, and Alabama, seceded from the union and the North was constantly unpleased. These deals were made to pacify the hunger to expand to new lands and make them slave states. Opposing the pro-slavery South, Northerners either believed in the gradual emancipation of slavery or immediate …show more content…
The Missouri Compromise was first thought of when Missouri and Maine requested to join the Union. Congress had hoped with the entrance of new states, is issue of slavery would be avoided. However, this was not the cause and slavery became a debated issue once again. The North did not agree that adding Missouri to the Union as a slave state was fair because the South would have one more slave state than the North had free states. To ease these tensions, the Missouri Compromise was formed and Susan Dudley Gold describes the intentions in the Missouri Compromise, “The amendment offered an incentive to the North-a ban on slavery in the northern territories (and future states)-and two incentives to the South-no restrictions on slavery in Missouri and a fugitive state.” The Missouri Compromise was written by Henry Clay and this agreement stated that the lands of the Louisiana Purchase and any lands north of the thirty-sixth parallel did not allow slavery, with the exception of Missouri. The transcript of the Missouri Compromise states, “That the inhabitants of that portion of the Missouri territory included within the boundaries... authorized to form for themselves a constitution and state government, and to assume such name as they shall deem proper.” This concession helped create a balance between the North and South that was crucial to keeping a civil war from erupting, however the soon destruction of this agreement, caused by the …show more content…
It separated the North and South further because it ensured that the amount of slave states to non slave states was equal. This compromise led to the American Civil War because it created two distinct sides, slavery (South) and anti slavery (North), and when they disagreed, their discord led to the formation of a new deal to pacify them. Thomas Jefferson realized that these agreements would eventually end badly, his beliefs are displayed on Ancestral Findings, “Thomas Jefferson predicted dividing the country this way would eventually lead the country into Civil War.” In 1820, forty-one years prior to the Civil War, Thomas Jefferson was able to see that these agreements were going to harm the country and end in madness. Yet, Congress continued to pass compromises after the warning, inching them closer to being on the brink of civil war. The Missouri Compromise directly influenced the start of the American Civil War because this compromise set distinct boundaries isolating both of the sides from one another. Also, this agreement only fixed the problem at hand and would not save the nation in the long run because to an extent, the nation was no longer fully united, rather it was unified on both sides, separately, and opposing the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Many political issues had detrimental effects that caused the Civil War. One of those issues being the Missouri Compromise, which took place in 1820. The reasoning behind the Missouri compromise was due to the South feeling that since the North had gained Maine, as a free state, that the political power would be much stronger than it would be in the South. Therefore, Missouri was to become a slave state, which then also created the cutoff line for free and slave states. The Missouri compromise was not a problem that was solved quickly, the entire process took about two years to solve.…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Missouri Compromise divided the nation into two separate parts, free or slave states. Popular sovereignty allowed the states to choose whether or not they would be free. As read in the text, “What then we do insist on, is, not to extend slavery, but that we shall not be prohibited from immigrating with our property, into the Territories of the United States” (Document 8). The South wanted to bring slavery with them and believed they had the right to do so. Although, in the North it was decided that slavery would be abolished and they would all be free states.…

    • 577 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Missouri was well known for its slavery in the 1800s. If the Missouri Compromise didn’t happen, it was of changed the United States today greatly. The Missouri Compromise accomplished making Missouri a slave state and changing Maine into a free state because it wanted to be separated from Massachusetts. There were 22 states at the time equally divided into 11 slave states and 11 free slave states. There was chaos when the Missouri compromise was made, so they made Maine a free of slave state to even out the states.…

    • 205 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Luckily, the Civil War was delayed due to various settlements between political parties regarding slavery- such as the Missouri Compromise, Compromise of 1850, and the Kansas-Nebraska Act. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 was proposed by Representative Henry Clay from Kentucky. Clay came up with this after Missouri demanded to become a state, which would have upset the existing balance among free and slave states. The compromise resulted in Missouri admitted as a slave state and Maine carved out of Massachusetts as a free state.…

    • 508 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    But serval members of congress from the north objected this. There were 11 slave’s states and 11 Free states. By adding Missouri there would be an increase in slave state and the power of southern states senate. The Missouri compromise was signed in to law 1820. The Missouri compromise had two main points; Missouri would be allowed slavery and Maine will be part of free state Which will balance the power of north and south.…

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dbq Era Of Good Feelings

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The period after the War of 1812 was christened the Era of Good Feelings because of the nationalistic spirit, high morale, and unfamiliar cooperation among politicians that flourished during the time. Following the War of 1812, the Democratic-Republicans established an essentially one-party system, embracing some of the policies of the inactive Federalist Party and thereby eliminating hostility between the two parties. Although there was a rising spirit of nationalism and morale, the Era of Good Feelings was also marked by sectionalism, divisions within the Democratic-Republican Party, and strife over tariffs, the national bank, and internal improvements. The growing sectionalism can be attributed to both the friction between the North and…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages

    It received backlash from both the south and the north, “The Missouri Compromise…

    • 1115 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Senator Stephen Douglas of Illinois was the man who decided to put this act into effect. At the time, the Missouri Compromise was in effect that stated that no slave territories be added into the Union above the 36o30’ line, which Kansas and Nebraska both were above, but anything below that line may be added in as a slave stateZ. Senator Stephen Douglas, a Democrat, stated in the act that the people of the territory were allowed to vote on the subject of slavery in their territory. Douglas, who was a pro slavery senator as most Democrats were, was all in favor of this act that completely disregards the terms and conditions of the Missouri Compromise. On the other hand, many of the Northern abolitionists at the time disagreed completely with the idea because of the fact it would allow slavery into territories it should not. This is a strong instance in which the country was divided into north and south based on the argument of slavery in new territories.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Civil War Dbq

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The act repealed the Missouri Compromise as Senator Steven Douglas stated in the act that popular sovereignty would determine if slavery should or should not exist in these territories, while the Missouri Compromise stated that there shall be no slavery passed the 36°30’ line. There were numerous political and social effects this act had on the nation. A major effect would be the increased infuriation of the North from the repeal of the once thought “long-standing” Missouri Compromise. This infuriation led the North to distrust the South and also opened their eyes to what they believed was a Southern obsession with the expansion of slavery. The North would become less lenient to the idea of slavery.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the years leading up to this compromise, tensions between pro-slavery and anti-slavery groups began to rise. The major boiling point at the time arrived when Missouri sent a request to join the Union as a slave state. This upset the other states because for them to become a slave state, it would cause and unbalance. To keep the peace, Congress created a two-part compromise, giving Missouri their request, but also admitting the state of Maine as…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Missouri Compromise of 1820 brought Missouri into America as a slave state and Maine as a free state. Everything above the Louisiana Purchase Boundary line, with the exception of Missouri, banned slavery. This action resulted in maintaining an equal representation for both the North and the South in the Senate. Following this, the Compromise of 1850 allowed California to be admitted as a free state, however popular sovereignty would be used in the land of the Mexican Cession. This caused controversy within the states.…

    • 1394 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Missouri compromise was passed in 1820, which regulated slavery in the western states that were gained through the Louisiana purchase. This compromise contributed to the division between the north and south regarding the issue of slavery. Slavery was not allowed in anywhere north of the 36:30 parallel, but the state of Missouri allowed slavery. Fortunately, the compromise made many Americans happy and without the compromise the inevitable civil war would have occurred sooner. But unfortunately, the happiness of the country was ruined when the Missouri compromise got repealed.…

    • 1102 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    People of Value Many people are responsible for providing Americans with the freedoms we have today like Benjamin Franklin, James Madison, and Alexander Hamilton. These people would make great world leaders today for their contributions to society, government, and public relations. In general, these men have contributed to our country in many ways; for example, they drafted the United States Constitution. Alexander Hamilton, James Madison, and John Jay would publish the Federalist Papers.…

    • 1249 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    During the writing of the Constitution, there were a lot of disagreements on a lot of major issues. It was mainly between the north and the south, with their population sizes and on how the government should be ran. Those issues would affect how the President is elected, weather congress should elect, or the American people should elect. Also how the states would each be represented, by the population and if slaves counted towards the population. There was also the compromise on the trading of slaves, which was a big issue for the south.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As The United states began a time of expansion into the west in the late 1830’s, debates over whether or not slavery would be permitted in those territories vacated by the native Americans caused great disagreements in Government and Society. While slavery is the most obvious reason for succession, Westward expansion and the rights of the new states were responsible for much of the violent conflicts that lead to the Civil War. States struggled to find common ground, but the differences between North and South and new Immigration made A series of compromises were created but by 1860 compromise had failed. Southerners feared an increase in free states would create an imbalance of power and create an advantage to the abolition of slavery.…

    • 876 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays