The Inquisitor groups her together with the men and women who “may not take regular vows” and “begin with polygamy and end by incest.” Joan quickly goes from a simple protester to a sinner, even by modern means, yet the two actions will rarely ever correlate. Unlikely, since he generalizes her with hasty generalizations as well, but in works magnificently, their minds are harassed with revolting images, Joan is the epitome of that image. Now, not only does the Inquisitor indirectly relate her to indecency, rather than judging her of her actions, he takes it upon himself to describe her as a “liar” and “hypocrite.” Neither of which have none to do with the argument being presented, but to simplify and insult Joan is done far easier than developing a factual case with probable cause, a case that the Inquisitor lacks. It shifts the attention of “What has she actually done?” to “What a horror!” The train of thought is lost.The reason behind his ad hominem attacks on Joan. Further in the essay, he focuses his fallacies onto the court, no longer Joan. “You will see a diabolical pride and natural humility,” he warns, filling his speech, be wary of the girl. Reasonably, Joan has no effect on the French court, she can not allure them in with her “devilish pride” or work into their hearts with “one grain of malice.” One could say she’s harmless, housefly esque, but this scare (tactic) it fulfills all that he has described before. Joan has entered a realm where she cannot escape, she is toxic to society, therefore they must condemn her. When warned of this horrifying act, especially in the timing of the play, she must be punished. The stake has been completed, the
The Inquisitor groups her together with the men and women who “may not take regular vows” and “begin with polygamy and end by incest.” Joan quickly goes from a simple protester to a sinner, even by modern means, yet the two actions will rarely ever correlate. Unlikely, since he generalizes her with hasty generalizations as well, but in works magnificently, their minds are harassed with revolting images, Joan is the epitome of that image. Now, not only does the Inquisitor indirectly relate her to indecency, rather than judging her of her actions, he takes it upon himself to describe her as a “liar” and “hypocrite.” Neither of which have none to do with the argument being presented, but to simplify and insult Joan is done far easier than developing a factual case with probable cause, a case that the Inquisitor lacks. It shifts the attention of “What has she actually done?” to “What a horror!” The train of thought is lost.The reason behind his ad hominem attacks on Joan. Further in the essay, he focuses his fallacies onto the court, no longer Joan. “You will see a diabolical pride and natural humility,” he warns, filling his speech, be wary of the girl. Reasonably, Joan has no effect on the French court, she can not allure them in with her “devilish pride” or work into their hearts with “one grain of malice.” One could say she’s harmless, housefly esque, but this scare (tactic) it fulfills all that he has described before. Joan has entered a realm where she cannot escape, she is toxic to society, therefore they must condemn her. When warned of this horrifying act, especially in the timing of the play, she must be punished. The stake has been completed, the