What Is Nietzsche's Argument Against Religion

Improved Essays
1. Between Ivan Karamazov and Nietzsche, I think that Nietzsche makes the stronger argument against religious faith. Nietzsche, in Section 2 of the Antichrist, begins by condemning Christianity by saying “Active pity for all the failures and all the weak: Christianity.” Christianity gives people hope for the failures and weaknesses by letting them slide. It doesn’t teach them that they should grow stronger from their mistakes. Instead, it tells them that failing is okay because they tried and didn’t succeed. This is understandable but it shouldn’t be something that people continue to follow. Nietzsche believes that “Christianity should not be beautified and embellished: it has waged a deadly war against this higher type of man…the reprobate …show more content…
In The Antichrist, Nietzsche exclaims that when humans feel anxiety and scared, they immediately offer away their power to people who aren’t worthy and reliable enough and who will use the power other’s give them to make their own status/power even greater. Nietzsche, specifically, makes this argument when it comes to priests. To him, priests “hold all great concepts in his hand; he plays them out with benevolent contempt…horrors or vices” (Sec 8, 575). Priests try to make us believe that they know the truth and how we should live. They want us to believe that they know how we should live and what is right and wrong. People give into this fact and allow priests to see that it’s what gives them power and meaning. Nietzsche knew that if people kept giving in, priests would continue to feed off the power that the people give them. Nietzsche believes as well that “As long as the priest is considered a higher type of man—this professional negator, slanderer, and poisoner of life—there is no answer to the question: what is truth?” (Sec 8, 575). If we continue to give into the belief that priests hold what is the truth and what is a lie, then they have won. This is what gives them their power. We allow them to forgive our “sins” or wrongdoings because they declare what is a wrongful action or what is a righteous action. Comparing this to American culture today, Nietzsche is completely correct. We feed our power to these “figureheads” like the Kardashians and politicians like Hillary Clinton or Trump. Specifically, society looks up to Kim Kardashian and her life because of a sex-tape she made which made Kim famous. From that, it gave her publicity and fortune which should have never been grown out of something like that. But, society has given her this ability to enhance her life and she could care less about anyone else but herself and her family, in the end. Even, Hillary Clinton and Trump have their own intentions in mind and could generally care less what the people

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The Parable of the Madman by Friedrich Nietzsche tells of a man with a lantern who is searching for God, but announces that God is dead. No one believes in God or the power of God anymore, and so therefore the people have “killed” his existence in their minds. The madman is not celebrating God’s “death,” but is warning the people because he fears what will happen if they do not have a God in their lives, or some sort of purpose and direction. The madman believed there was a God, but the acts of man murdered him. He smashes his candle as he knows that the light of God is dead. Nietzsche had observed a middle-class culture that he believed was run by illusions and self-deceptions. He believed christianity and the idea of going to heaven after…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Morality as Anti-Nature, Friedrich Nietzsche reveals his philosophical opinion on the use of morals while living and making decisions, rather than relying on innate reasoning. Nietzsche supposes morals and religion are in opposition to life’s passions. “But an attack on the roots of passion means an attack on the roots of life: the practice of the church is hostile to life.” (Nietzsche 348) His immoral views disagree with the “anti-natural morality” reared by the church and Christianity. I do not agree with Nietzsche’s position. His rhetoric fails to convince me that his assumption of morality is anti-nature is accurate.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I believe power can corrupt the mind; it corrupts the allowance of the urge to hold power to consume your morals. The author of “The House of the Scorpion” writes, “‘Well, Matt. Do you have any personal shortcomings you’d like to share?’ ‘No,’ said Matt… the man hurled himself across the room and struck him with a force that almost made him pass out with pain.” (Farmer 301-303). In the story, “The House of the Scorpion”, a man in a position of power brutally assaulted a child because he stole something. Moments later, the same man attacked another child, because after experiencing the rush of power, he had been corrupted. The compulsion to wield this new power consumed the man’s morales. In a different article, Nietzsche writes, “Whether… even if we stake our lives, as martyrs…

    • 661 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This relation was extremely important because even though science had already established itself prior to Nietzsche’s time, Christianity’s influence was still considerably stronger. Not only was it important, it was revolutionary because Nietzsche believed Christianity used mankind’s inability to grasp infinity to oppress the masses through promises of life after death. To him, mankind’s fear of death and inability to understand infinity strengthened Christianity’s power over every facet of influence it…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I want to start off by saying that Friedrich Nietzsche was one of the more complicated philosophers that I ever had pleasure of studying. What I took away from Friedrich Nietzsche opinions on the death of God is that he was referring to the declining belief and respect for God or religion in general. Nietzsche felt that with the loss of religion the west would lose its distinctive cultural identity. Friedrich Nietzsche was not a big fan of Christianity to say the least, but he still understood its importance and its benefits to the culture.…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nietzsche being an atheist was faced with the dilemma of having no moral code to follow. Nietzsche’s statement which originates from his books The Gay Science, and Thus Spoke Zarathustra, is often mistaken as a celebratory statement that reflects the triumph of atheism over theism and instituted religion. However, Nietzsche’s statement actually reflects his concern that atheists are simply directionless without an institution or a moral guide. Nietzsche is one of the few atheists that are brave enough to address this issue, as if God is dead, (or never existed according to Nietzsche himself) then all actions are permissible and humans have no guide in life or even a moral code to follow. Nietzsche’s respond to this atheist problem resides in his own philosophy and views and morality. Nietzsche also argued that with the death of God many of the common values and morals are dismantled and thus a sense of imbalance is created between people which will have major effects on culture, literature, and philosophy. Nietzsche argues that God is dead because the modern thinkers killed him. Through this claim, Nietzsche blames scientists and academics (himself included) for the nihilism resulted from the concept of God’s death. Nietzsche predicted that nihilism would be an inevitable conclusion to humans turning away from established religion and the overall concept of God. Nietzsche defined nihilism as the overall feeling or concept that everything is meaningless and pointless. Nihilism is another aspect of Schopenhauer’s philosophy that Nietzsche attempted to overcome through his own philosophy. Ergo, Nietzsche’s declaration that God is dead presents one of the most complicated problems for atheism, yet he overcomes it through his own philosophy and moral code of the will to power and the superman, yet not all atheists practice Nietzsche’s…

    • 1594 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Nietzsche was a very critical philosopher in his time. He believed that normative systems in other words, what we believe as morals are derived similarly with varied meanings and values over time. Morals and practices are often associated with cultures. They claim that morals are entirely different in cultures and are not universal in human society. He basically viewed how judgements on cultured morals are relativist claims of others than themselves (Chapter 31, page…

    • 75 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The natural history of moral: In the word of Nietzsche, the present day moral sentiments in Europe is as diverse, irritable, subtle as the “science of morals” is still raw and awkward. Today’s philosophers lack the historical outlook and they try to justify morality their own morality. Nietzsche states that people are different from the way they think, and they possessed. He gives the example of knowledge and charity as a means of possession because when a child gets some knowledge from his teacher he thinks in a way as his teacher wants him to think. Nietzsche express discontent to “slave revolt in morality” which believes rich, powerful as evil and poor as good.…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Question 3) In the first essay of On the Genealogy of Morality, Nietzsche’s central concern is the slave revolt in morality. In this paper, I argue that Nietzsche does not think Marx an example of the slave revolt in morality as Nietzsche’s view of the slave class is different to Marx’s view of the proletarians as well as their differing suggestions in terms of imaginary revenge and physical revolution.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his work ‘The Will to Power’ Nietzsche writes “ I regard Christianity as the most fatal and seductive lie that has ever yet existed, as the greatest and most impious lie”. In this quote Nietzsche says that this impious lie has denied the basic element of human nature and instinct to pursue power. In order to develop this moral vision of his own, Nietzsche introduces the concept of “Over-man”. This over man figure essentially functions as Nietzsche’s personification of the “Will to Power” and the over man is embodiment of the Will toPower. In other words is the creator of the new value system. According to Nietzsche” This Over-man is superior to Christ because he celebrates this earthly world as opposed to some other unearthly…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    People with political power have a tendency to sway radical ideas and cause followers to pursue vile beliefs. Presidents, kings, popes, judicial leaders, and public speakers have influence on their supporters and can make them do repugnant deeds. Role models are everything, and in that case, people will do almost anything to make sure that their role models are on their side. Their followers will do good deeds and others will do bad, actions beyond one's imagination and as far as unsubstantiated murder. The higher powers in the world are…

    • 1093 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Humans strive daily to answer impossible questions. A hundred years ago, even the wildest dreamers had no idea how far society today would progress. We’ve discovered the tiniest parts that make up everything in the world around us, and then delved even deeper than ever expected possible. Even space, a mysterious and faraway place to century old individuals, is becoming more familiar. The one question humans have never been able to answer, however, is: what is the meaning of life? With a question so broad, it seems impossible to even know where to begin. Kurt Vonnegut, author of Cat’s Cradle, suggests that we must take responsibility for finding meaning in our own lives, and unless the significance is pronounced by oneself, it is irrelevant.…

    • 999 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nietzsche And Nihilism

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Nietzsche characterized Europe in late nineteenth century as nihilistic, and even considered the late twentieth century to be even more so. He generalizes that we no longer need a God, that a God doesn 't give us meaning and purpose to our lives. Our lives are simply meaningless and lack the capacity to become anything new. Nietzsche stressed that without a sole purpose of living, we would create a new world built on weakness and comfort. He also foresaw that nihilism might lead to radical nationalism, causing horrific wars. Nietzsche’s aim was to create a new society and system of values which are centered around out needs. For Nietzsche, this new society and system of values should be brought out through his doctrine of the overman and the…

    • 1191 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In God is dead by Nietzsche two bold claims are made which are God is dead and that we are responsible for his death. This is something that Christians, Muslims, Jews and anyone else who believes in some form of a God would be very angry about. With the first claim Nietzsche does not mean that there was a God that died in a physical sense. Whereas it means that nothing in this world has absolute authority…

    • 826 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the 1882 collection The Gay Science German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche first stated the idea “God is dead!” a point which he later referred back to throughout his body of work. The death of God has become a widely quoted statement and as such has met various interpretations and misinterpretations leading to a wide general debate as to whether Nietzsche was actually correct in proclaiming the death of God. In answering this question, it becomes of fundamental importance that there must be a clear understanding of what the phrase means and how it is to be read before one can fully analyse the truth of the statement. Theologians have disputed there are numerous interpretations to the Nietzsche’s philosophy, with Hudson suggesting four key meanings: psychological, sociological, ontological and theological respectively . If each of these…

    • 2376 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Superior Essays

Related Topics