Essay Comparing Medina And Nietzsche's Philosophy

Improved Essays
A Comparison of Medina and Nietzsche’s Philosophy
The philosophies of Jose Medina and Friedrich Nietzsche differ in the sense that Medina focuses on the epistemic injustice while Nietzsche focuses on deconstructing morality. Medina explores injustice in society with the goal of finding factors that contribute to its existence. In essence, the philosopher believes morality to be a noble human virtue, and a factor that can be used to eliminate social injustices. However, due to social beliefs that alter the perspectives of oppressors and the oppressed, it becomes difficult to champion for morality. In the case of Friedrich Nietzsche, he argues that morality is a questionable human virtue that has no objective place in reality. Friedrich Nietzsche considers morality to be a societal constructions that focuses on achieving ideals believe to be “noble” by the higher class at the expense of those at the bottom of the class. More importantly, he points out that Morality ignores the relatives experiences and perspectives which inform the reality of individuals. It chooses to create one form of reality for the whole society, a factor that contribute to most of the social shortcomings of society. Therefore,
…show more content…
This is not surprising since we are dealing with an epistemic injustice that is grounded in a comparative social injustice” (66). The author is using events presented in the book “To Kill a Mockingbird” to show how oppression is perpetuated by social belief systems. In “On the Genealogy of Morality,” Nietzsche notes that “The active, the attacking, encroaching human, is still located a hundred paces nearer to justice than the reactive one” (49). Nietzsche is exploring the origins of morality to show that it has nothing to do with the noble ideals it represents. In essence, the author is of the opinion that it promotes injustices since individuals are forced to live with an aspect that is not entirely their

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Morality is the product of society. He believed that the subconscious mind is one-self without the awareness of society's morality, one's true self. The subconscious mind is one's instinct (notes). To further examine these concepts of evil, it is best to apply Freud's discoveries to other views on society. Philosopher Jean-Jacque Rousseau believed that, as human beings, "our greatest evils come from ourselves," (notes) which helps tie into Freud's theory of the subconscious mind.…

    • 1427 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In his collection of essays On the Genealogy of Morality, Nietzsche distinguishes between the moral systems of good/bad and good/evil and describes their origins, as well as problems that arise with the origins of good/evil in order to analyze two different moral systems and their implications. Nietzsche first distinguishes between the two moral systems of good/bad and good/evil in order to draw a contrast. Good/bad is defined as those with power and those without power: the good, like the warrior caste, have the power while the bad, like the poor, do not have the power. This is a binary way of viewing morality where good is the exact opposite of bad. The binary of good/bad does not implicate anyone for their status but is instead based in…

    • 1020 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although many argue that utility does not take play in justice, Mill disagrees. “To recapitulate: the idea of justice supposes two things; a rule of conduct, and a sentiment which sanctions the rule”(Mill, 45). In regards to justice there are two main factors for Mill. The first being equality and the second being punishment. The goal of punishment is to establish order and reorder of social order, and vengeance is an animalistic desire that is natural.…

    • 1441 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    What Nietzsche seeks to establish is that the difference between the good and bad and the good and evil is a querry of where the assessment originates. Nietzsche begins the session by explaining his dissatisfaction with the English psychologists who have attempted to explain the meaning of morality. The English psychologists claimed that “good” referred to unegoistic useful actions by the people who benefited from such actions. He says that to get the true meaning of good, one should look at the etymology of some of the words and phrases used to describe this concept. His approach to finding the meaning of good is that it was associated with nobility and badness with simpleness and the common man.…

    • 1098 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ethics is a branch of philosophy that, at its core, seeks to understand and to determine how human actions can be judged as right or wrong. There are multiple variations and subclasses of ethical theories. These theories that help us with decision making can be challenged or critiqued. In particular Mill’s Utilitarianism, an ethical theory that promoted the greatest happiness for the greatest number, was criticized by Charles Taylor in his article The Diversity of Goods. The article written by Charles Taylor argues a utilitarian and consequentialist conception of morality leaves out essential aspects of human experience that are integral to our moral lives.…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He does not believe that science should have a bearing on a person’s morality, but these philosophers developed their scientific methods as a way to support the basis of their personal morality, thus allowing them to classify those who opposed them as evil and immoral. Similarly, I believe Nietzsche aims to persuade the middle class to stray from traditional moral codes such as ones…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In his On the Genealogy of Morality, Nietzsche presents a potent challenge to morality by saying that Morality is one kind of ethical system that promoting narcosis, calm and passive. It is created by hatred priests who are envying of Nobles’ power and strength and horrified of pain, struggle, and restlessness. It is hindering human flourishing now but yet necessary to help us get into a better post-moral society, finally, enable human flourishing. Nietzsche unfolds his argument by firstly categorize different kinds of ethical system. Secondly, he explains how they those systems change among society and why he claim morality is a new kind of ethical system different from the previous one.…

    • 1178 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In relation to lying, Kant is concerned that the action cannot be universalized. Kant believes actions should be universal because those actions are assisting in the function of society. An immoral action does not help the action function well. In the case of lying, the trust necessary to form a society is eroded and the society cannot function. Thus, lying is an action that cannot be morally permissible.…

    • 1751 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The difference of Machiavelli and Thoreau’s view on governing comes from the fact that they both are taking opposite perspectives on the same issue. Both discuss harsh governing. Machiavelli views it as necessary, while Thoreau views it as unjust, however Machiavelli is writing as one who governs, while Thoreau is writing as one being governed. The difference in audience is the cause for the differences between Machiavelli and Thoreau’s understanding of morality, humanity, and efficiency. As someone who is being governed by a government he finds unjust, Thoreau believes we must object to anything we find morally wrong.…

    • 792 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    He critiques it within his story to show how dehumanization is not only unjust but on the other hand shows the structural chaste system in society. Before the…

    • 1679 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays