Nietzsche's Misguided Moral Values

Improved Essays
Since the early ages of time men called philosophers have argued and tried to put together a kind of framework for morality in humans. There are men like Kant who in the 18th century tried to instill a universal law for everyone and then there are men like Nietzsche who came in the 19th century and tried to impair humankind's thoughts on morality as a whole. In Kant's foundation of work he introduces his categorical imperative as a universal moral law. In nietzsche's On the Genealogy of Morals, Nietzsche later goes on the offensive against Kant's categorical imperative on that Kant, like many others, has been mistaken into advocating for a set of misguided moral values. Duty, the main foundation of the categorical imperative, carries with …show more content…
Nietzsche sets out to find what the Judeo-Christian mentality perceives as moral. Here we are presented with the difference of the noble and the non-noble as the dividing factor in early society. The noble was comprised of the naturally powerful warriors, lords, or as he later calls them “the birds of prey”. The noble people were the first to form moral values, which were simply reinstating their own ideals as a good thing to do, where anything that is not in unison with these ideals was naturally deemed to be bad. Usually when the noble considers strength to be a good quality, being weak is immediately seen as a bad thing. The noble people were forming their morals by themselves and never thought to go further and try to validate why they are the morals to live by. Nietzsche talks about how two sets of morals grew apart in these times: Good/Bad and Good/Evil. The good/bad is the nobel set of morals and the good/evil are the lower class morals. The non noble are placed aside those “birds of prey” as “lambs”. Whenever the predator preys on a lamb they are automatically called evil. This evil comes from the non-noble virtue, the good as an opposition to the evil and only is a reaction to what the noble considers as a virtue. Nietzsche believes and talks about how humans are not promise keeping animals and we tend to be forgetful. One might ask themselves “Why work hard to get something, when I can take it from someone else”. Nietzsche finds the origins to guilt and “bad conscience” as historical events that allowed guilt to become a harmful value. When civilizations first emerged and needed to protect themselves from harm, people had to stop acting like “birds of prey” and act in a “civilized” manner to their neighbors. The sudden loss of “freedom”, for the strongest who was never before was

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Nietzsche was a very critical philosopher in his time. He believed that normative systems in other words, what we believe as morals are derived similarly with varied meanings and values over time. Morals and practices are often associated with cultures. They claim that morals are entirely different in cultures and are not universal in human society. He basically viewed how judgements on cultured morals are relativist claims of others than themselves (Chapter 31, page…

    • 75 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nietzsche divides morality into two separate parts, Master Morality and Slave Morality. Master morality having its beginning…

    • 388 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Nietzsche’s approach, he attempts to back up his claims by accusing other philosophers of not being able to think critically. He does not believe that the good man is the opposite of the evil man like previous philosophers believed. Nietzsche accuses past philosophers of establishing their beliefs based on the good man being opposite of the evil man. In Nietzsche’s Beyond Good and Evil, it is discussed that people are treated differently. He uses a larger scale to show the materialistic ethics in which the more powerful individuals in society can mistreat those that are more vulnerable.…

    • 952 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    How Siddhartha is going through Nietzsche's Three Metamorphoses For many years intellects from around the world have wondered what the key to true enlightenment is. They have wondered how people can balance their physical and spiritual life, and lead a moral, and satisfying life. With his 1922 novel, Siddhartha, Hermann Hesse addresses these concerns, and through narrating the story of the young prince, tries to answer to these wonders. On a journey of multiple lessons, Siddhartha experiences rebirth, and enlightenment. Moreso, these rebirths Siddhartha undergoes are a representation of the young Brahmin going through the Three Metamorphoses that are seen in Nietzsche’s…

    • 2108 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    It is only here did the “human soul in a higher sense acquire depth and become evil” (Nietzsche 16). This story forms the rhetorical framework of the First Treatise, guiding Nietzsche towards his main goal: to examine, question, and critique the value of moral values, all in an endeavor to move “beyond good and evil”. Nietzsche posits that today’s altruistic morality arose through a successful overturning of a previously existing system of morality in which character traits of the aristocratic and noble class were…

    • 1385 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nietzsche’s writing are very distinctive and provocative in their style. His writing are designed to provoke question or even to provoke doubts rather to answer basic philosophical questions. In this respect, Nietzsche has a particular fondness for use of metaphors, parabolas and aphorism. Nietzsche in his book ‘On Genealogy of morality’ sought to prove certain points about the morality by tracking its history, the way and which people are conceived of morality. Nietzsche takes the view that morality should be grounded in ascetic values…..…

    • 1048 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “Not everyone has your superior moral fiber” (Greenburg, 2009, para. 15). This statement in response to Greenburg’s opposition to the iron teeth is compelling. It demonstrates how society recognizes morality but rarely aspires to put in time or effort to engage in moral situations. In “Iron Teeth,” Greenburg reveals the negative view society forms toward anyone or anything that diminishes productivity or growth of personal status in society.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant supports the categorical imperative with three different rules, all of which convince me that we have moral duties to ourselves because these rules are in a sense applicable to everyday life. The three rules include the universal law, treat humans as ends in themselves, and act as if you live in the Kingdom of ends. Universal law is discussed first where Kant states, “There is only one categorical imperative. It is an act only according to that maxim by which you can at the same time…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Nietzsche wrote that this type of “noble man, too, helps the unfortunate, but not from compassion, or almost not, but more from an urge produced by the abundance of power” (Nietzsche, p.155). Those who are weak, enslaved and unhealthy are seen as ‘bad’, because their weakness is undesirable (not useful). While the ‘weak’ referred to the ‘masters’ as ‘evil’ and called themselves by contrast…

    • 1135 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    To distinguish a difference between Kant and Nietzsche, Kant was the first one, between the two of them to explain the theory of morals. Some values as he defines them have a built in value which have developed by themselves, and they follow those values as they lead to this statement: “Duty carries with itself absolute necessity”. This claim explains Kant’s way of explaining moral theory. Which is where Nietzsche firstly disagrees with Kant, he refused to accept the same values as a given fact, and instead he looks for the next step and tries to see how those duties came to have their value.…

    • 307 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The author Friedrich Nietzsche in his text (“The Madman”, 1882) used a narrative to prove a point. To be more specific he wanted to show or demonstrate to people how bad was the status of religion and of faith in Europe around his time (1882-1887) the time when he was publishing “The Gay Science”. The story started with a man who is described as a “madman”. The madman begins by entering a marketplace and starts to shout loudly “I seek God! I seek God!”…

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Of those philosophers who seek to define life in some way, mostly positively, there are a set of provoking souls who seek to uproot any optimistic perspective such as Friedrich Nietzsche. He sees life as a bleak, ephemeral, meaningless, and deceptive time from birth until death as he explains in the essay “On Truth and Lie in an Extra-Moral Sense.” One of the subjects he especially focuses on is the topic of metaphors in language and naming empirical objects that surround us. When a human hears a word and brings about an image, that image is not universal amongst all humans; thus, the attempt to create a single sound to represent a varying subject should be considered unfeasible and a form of lying. Nietzsche puts forward the idea that because…

    • 1632 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Master and slave morality is a prominent theme in Nietzsche’s work Beyond Good and Evil. Master morality is an attitude of being to moral and appalling, respectively. Slave morality is an attitude which holds to the standard of that which is beneficial to the weak or powerless. Besides the differences, there are also similarities between them, including using this relationship as an undertake to getting to the basis of what it means to be “good” or “bad” and both types of morality being equally logical. Master morality emerges first, with slave morality being a reaction to it, as it hints in this quotation: “being noble, wanting to be by oneself, being able to be different, standing alone and having to live independently” (161).…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Morality as Anti-Nature, Friedrich Nietzsche reveals his philosophical opinion on the use of morals while living and making decisions, rather than relying on innate reasoning. Nietzsche supposes morals and religion are in opposition to life’s passions. “But an attack on the roots of passion means an attack on the roots of life: the practice of the church is hostile to life.” (Nietzsche 348) His immoral views disagree with the “anti-natural morality” reared by the church and Christianity.…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The periscope of interest for this paper is Friedrich Nietzsche’s article, “On Truth and Lies in a Nonmoral Sense.” Nietzsche was categorized as a post-modern philosopher who, through his works, had a tremendous influence on Western philosophy. The particular piece of writing discussed here deals with the relationship that human language has on the formation of truths and lies. The meaning behind the text, if true, essentially makes us rethink everything we think we know. “On Truth and Lies in a Nonmoral Sense” is Nietzsche’s explanation of how and why humans have created their own perceptions of truths and lies.…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays