In "Global warming is a lie", it mentions how Al Gore talks about how people need to help the environment but he doesn 't set that example by ay means. Even President Obama makes claims that global warming is a treat that’s needs to be dealt with but according to the article both Al Gore and President Obama financially benefit from "promoting" global warming. 22 million dollars goes to global warming incentives, which simple tax payers might not even know if the incentives are even help the environment. Now global warming in politics might take an opposite turn, taking a quote from presidential cardiant Donald Trump expressing his disbeliefs. "Donald Trump expressed similar disbelief that anyone could still be pushing a climate change agenda, Trump going so far as to say that “scientists are having a lot of fun” with us. " ( "New Reports: There Is No Global …show more content…
I think because we had such a non-bias presentation, we let it up to the induvial people to decide there opinion. We did a poll before we did the presentation and then one after; the two couldn 't have been any different. It went from most people agreeing that global warming was a threat to most people believe that it was a hoax. Many people agreed with that its still important to care for the environment but disagreed with the fact that global warming is a big threat. Since global warming has unreliable data to prove that the earth is heating up, people realize that could be political and mediated hoax. This shows when people are only exposed to one side or the other and then giving both in an non-bias way, they can decide truly for