Argumentative Essay: Is Abortion Ethical?

Great Essays
Is Abortion Ethical? Since the 1900’s abortion has been one of the topics on the hot seat of debate in our nation. Abortion has been a reoccurring debate where Americans ponder whether or not aborting a fetus is an appropriate moral action. On one hand some people feel that abortion should be legal because a woman has the right to choose what she wants to do with her body. On the other hand, some people believe a fetus has the right to life, making it immoral to get an abortion. Many individuals, such as philosopher Mary Anne Warren believe that abortion should be legal without any restrictions on it. However many problems arise with this for me and I believe that we should take a stand against abortion and how it deprives from future …show more content…
It had been practiced until about 1880, by which time most states had banned it except to save the life of the women. People such as Mary Anne Warren took the side against this movement and were in favor of abortion. She starts off here debate with the definition of a“human.” Warren takes a traditional argument stating that (1) it is wrong to kill innocent human beings, and (2) fetuses are innocent human beings, then (3) it is wrong to kill fetuses. She argues that one of these premises is question-begging and the word “human” if used in two different senses, then the conclusion will not follow. The moral sense, in which an individual is human enough to where human rights and value and be established, and the genetic sense, the sense in which any member of the species is a human being and no other species could …show more content…
Another problem arises asking if we don’t know which qualities a person needs to be considered human, why do we need these qualities in the first place? There may be other qualities that could classify someone as a person. Also after further research, coming across a book The Moral Question of Abortion by Stephen Schwartz, he explains that Warren is confusing being a person with functioning as a person. Giving a perfect example of someone who is in a deep dreamless sleep, they are not conscious and cannot reason. We still however view her as a human although she lacks the qualities Warren suggests. Schwartz states “killing someone in their sleep would be just as wrong as killing them while they are awake and functioning as a person.” This can then be compared to a fetus, they are not functioning people yet, however they are still a person in that they are showing physical qualities much like a person in a deep sleep and to kill them would be

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Therefore, she grants the opposing side that the fetus is a person. Thomson claims…

    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Warren believes that the first couple weeks of pregnancy a fetus does not have a functional nervous system and it isn’t capable to have the same experience as humans. Warren also describes the fetus isn’t aware of itself and can’t control itself in any type of way. She believes early fetuses are not humans. She believes that abortion is morally…

    • 1246 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Roe V. Wade Argument

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Many philosophers have even tried to come up with criteria with which to say what is a person and what is not. Mary Anne Warren was a writer and philosophy professor, known for her work on abortion, the most noted writing being the article, On the Moral and Legal Status of Abortion. In the article, Warren…

    • 1464 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Abortion is the planned termination of a human pregnancy. Several philosophers and activists have argued over if it is permissible. The author of A Defense of Abortion, Judith Jarvis Thomson, is correct about her argument that abortion is permissible even if the fetus is a person. This is because a woman’s right to bodily autonomy, which, combined with the woman’s own right to life, takes precedent over a fetus’s right to life. Even if people claim that she gave the fetus permission to be there, she should not be forced into going against her right to bodily autonomy.…

    • 1157 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I think that Warren needs to stress the claim that while both a fetus and infant are not persons, by her definition of personhood, a fetus’s rights are completely dependent on the mother, in contrast to an infant. While a fetus is inside of the mother, a fetus is not a part of the moral community, and all the mother’s rights outweigh the fetus’s. The fetus’s right to life is overridden by the mothers right to her body because she has full moral status, while the fetus does not. An infant however, no longer is dependent on their mother’s rights, since it’s not using her body to…

    • 750 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Marquis argues that the way Warren’s view of personhood is wrong. He states that “if we take it quite literally, it is too narrow. Someone who is asleep is no conscious, is not reason, and is not exhibiting self-motivated activity. A final point that Marquis mention he says “individual future of value at a given age is one’s potential at that age to live to a greater age and to have a future life that on would value.” He’s saying if we get rid of that one life which is the fetus is basically taking her future value of her life away.…

    • 1030 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Warren mainly emphasizes that “the rights of an actual person always outweighs those of a potential person” (Munson & Ian, 2016, p. 493). Just like the “anti” abortion views, Warren finds it always permissible to receive an abortion when due to rape. The woman carrying the child is an actual person who participates in the community around her, while the fetus has the potential to be a person just as the woman. But the fetus has yet to become this actual person. Warren would argue against Marquis view, that the value of the future for the woman carry the fetus is more important than the future of the fetus.…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    She then points out five traits to personhood, including consciousness and the ability to feel pain, reasoning; the capacity to solve new and complex problems, self-motivated activity: activity that is relatively independent of either genetic or direct external control, the capacity to communicate, the presence of self-concepts and self-awareness. If a human being does not fulfill any of these traits it’s not a person. A woman should have the right to decide on abortion. Mary Anne would tell the couple that it is okay to get an abortion if they feel like it’s the best thing to do, she would explain that a fetus is not fully a…

    • 827 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many people tend to focus their argument on the life of the fetus without putting no value to the life of the mother. Personhood is the condition of being an individual person, aware of self, and be able to think. Fetus does not have consciousness, cannot think, and is dependent to the mother, therefore, it is not constitute as a person. The Fourteenth Amendment of the US Constitution does not include the unborn as a person. Every choice we make in life comes with a decision which is governed by individual rights.…

    • 108 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Where Thomson addresses John Paul II’s missed premise about the content to the right to life, leads his argument to be an invalid conclusion. She also touches upon and disagrees that the fetus’s rights outweigh that of the mother whereas Paul II believes otherwise. Warren chooses to elaborate Thomson's objections with the argument of what constitutes as person, and personhood, with the five traits that a fetus does not satisfy. Thus, according to these counterarguments the traditional argument loses its validity; leading to my own conclusion that the argument is invalid. References: Thomson, J. (1971).…

    • 1013 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    She believed there were two definitions of a human even though the difference might not always be distinct. Because of this, she argues the following common pro-life argument must be fallacious, (1) it is wrong to kill innocent human beings. (2) Fetuses are innocent human beings. (3) So, it is wrong to kill a fetus.…

    • 1206 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Abortion Essay Rough Draft One half of pregnancies among American women are unintended, and four in ten of these are terminated by abortion. Abortion is a widely debated issue today, with many legal, social, and political implications. This essay discusses the ethical issues of abortion, up until the first trimester, more specifically who should be allowed to have one, whether or not the fetus has rights, the government’s place in abortion, and the level of access of abortion. Abortion should continue to be legal and readily available, and decisions made about it should be left between woman and her doctor. Abortion has been used to control reproduction throughout history.…

    • 1957 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    These include the ability to feel pain, reason, participate in self-motivated activity, communicate, and be self-aware. While originally when I read this article, I was not convinced by Warren’s argument, the more I studied the material I understood where she was coming from. She did clarify that a “person” does not have to show all of these traits and not one of them is absolutely necessary to be considered a “person.” Her story about a space explorer coming across extraterrestrial life and then trying to apply the criteria to the lifeform to determine personhood helped me understand the criteria and where her argument was going. (Warren 341) Judith Thomson also presents a compelling argument in favor of abortion in “A Defense of Abortion.”…

    • 1953 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This brings me into Warren’s definition for moral personhood being the concept of humanity in the moral sense. Moral sense is tied with moral community and we are pressed with the question if a human fetus should be accepted into being a member of this moral community. Warren states that moral community only holds all and only people and not all and only human beings. (pg.2) Warren’s explanation of personhood includes a list of five criteria that allows people to have full moral rights. Listed…

    • 86 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    When looking at human life from a moral point of view, can a fetus be considered a…

    • 2014 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Great Essays