Krakauer strives to ideally display the type of person Chris was, rather than the “reckless narcissist” or “noble idealist” outsiders viewed him as. For example, the author uses complex sentence structures to show the complexity of Chris: “Didn’t matter what it was, he’d do it: hard physical labor, mucking rotten grain, and dead rats out of the bottom of the hole- jobs where you’d get so damn dirty you couldn’t even tell what you looked like at the end of the day” (Krakauer 18). Chris was always making situations harder than they needed to be, which is a constant theme throughout the book. However, Chris is extremely intelligent and was always questioning life and creating challenges for himself, some of which may have been too challenging. In any case, Chris’s perspective on life was difficult for people to understand, but Krakauer creates an arranged, syntactic viewpoint of the raw existence Chris longed
Krakauer strives to ideally display the type of person Chris was, rather than the “reckless narcissist” or “noble idealist” outsiders viewed him as. For example, the author uses complex sentence structures to show the complexity of Chris: “Didn’t matter what it was, he’d do it: hard physical labor, mucking rotten grain, and dead rats out of the bottom of the hole- jobs where you’d get so damn dirty you couldn’t even tell what you looked like at the end of the day” (Krakauer 18). Chris was always making situations harder than they needed to be, which is a constant theme throughout the book. However, Chris is extremely intelligent and was always questioning life and creating challenges for himself, some of which may have been too challenging. In any case, Chris’s perspective on life was difficult for people to understand, but Krakauer creates an arranged, syntactic viewpoint of the raw existence Chris longed