Post Positivism In Hard Sciences

Improved Essays
Not all social scientists agree that positivism, and its methods which borrow so heavily from the hard sciences, is the best way to generate understanding and knowledge. They argue that the role of things such as social construction and individual and group decision-making need a space within social science methodology (Schwandt, 1994). In response to these critiques, post-positivism was born. Post-positivism holds the same values as positivism, with a continued focus on the methods of the hard sciences, but understands that no method of research can be perfect. Post-positivism advocates for experimental design supplemented with qualitative methods (Crotty, 1998). This methodology, although it is still imperfect, is still the best method …show more content…
Researchers who adhere to a constructionist epistemology developed theoretical perspectives that take into account the role of human interaction in and construction of the social world. The first of these perspectives, Interpretivism, interprets the world by way of social and historical understanding (Crotty, 1998). Interpretivist researchers generate knowledge by studying the world through the eyes of people within a socially constructed reality. Building from the influences of Weber (1904) and Dilthey (1883), interpretive research seeks understanding at the level of the individual involved in producing meaning of phenomena. From this field are born three branches; phenomenology, hermeneutics, and symbolic interactionism. Phenomenology attempts to drop all pretense and understand phenomena through the direct experience of an individual, a method advanced by Husserl (1931). Hermeneutics focuses on reading and re-reading texts to foster new understandings of social structures, utilized by Gadamer in his work Being and Time (1962). Finally, symbolic interactionism, based on the teaching of George Mead (1934) believes that by inserting themselves into the process, researchers will achieve true understanding of a process or …show more content…
Postmodernism rejects the rationality inherent in modern culture and constantly plays with the social construct that this rationality has created. Postmodernism seeks to deconstruct all meaning to reconstructed with a new, possibly better, understanding. Postmodern researchers disregard the interaction between object and consciousness and believe that meaning is applied to object based on a previous foundations of meanings and understandings. They seek to disrupt the foundation of meanings and create a new framework through which meaning can be applied. Postmodernism operates on the assumption that the modern world has created issues that it is ill-equipped to handle. Most postmodern scholarship is relatively recent, but scholars such as Derrida (1967) and Lyotard (1979) wrote seminal works that defined the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    This theory relies upon the symbolic meaning people develop due to interactions with one another. Conley states that when people act on a perception, as a result, collectively make their meaning so (31). This theory demonstrates how humans develop different symbols that consequently adds meaning to the world in their viewpoint. The meanings are then molded from interactions within society (Symbolic Interactionism Theory). Herbert Blummer suggest that there are three core principles of this theory; meaning, thought, and language. Blummer suggest that people act the way they do based upon a meaning they have been given. Language helps create meaning to everything for it has a name. Finally, Blummer describes that thought implies interpretations that we have formed from these symbols (Symbolic Interactionism…

    • 670 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Many Postmodernist views are that there is no single worldview that captures all reality and humanity. This religion is evolving mostly in the Western Hemisphere. Postmodernism has their core roots in knowledge. They believe that there is no universal knower, and there is no God in the equation. In other words, postmodernism claims that knowledge has disappeared under its own weight. Postmodernism believe that if they can’t talk about facts or truth, because even if they do exist, then we can’t see them or know them. This also shows that since they can’t see God, then there is no God to become knowable…

    • 631 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    At first, it seemed to me that this way of accumulating data did not fit a social science, as I thought of sterile labs and people in white coats when thinking of experiments. However, after reading the section in the book, I was surprised how this method fit to collect data for sociology. However, I also thought about one point of criticism that was not listed in the book, but that seemed very present to me. Although experiments are a way to gather very specific data very fast, they do not seem to provide a sufficient explanation of data. Coming back to the example used in the book, that babies were treated differently based on the gender they were associated with, the experiment provides the data that this is indeed true, but it does not say why this phenomenon occurs and how it is incorporated in people’s…

    • 786 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    These researchers are looking to uncover rules not laws. An individuals view is to do with a subject and they embrace the subjective. They say the social world is meaningful where positivists say it isn't meaningful.…

    • 3706 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When we read literature, we attempt to understand another perspective. Just as one understands the words of a book, one “attends to [the] suffering” (Schweizer) of the author, starting “an endless act of comprehension”. We can use literature as a device to understand another life. Literature helps readers gain perspective and understanding. However, Harold Schweizer questions the readers’ intents when he states “suffering can become the occasion of an endless act of comprehension”. Reading literature does not equal comprehension or understanding. Readers must first understand how their life shapes their perspective and then they must let other perceptions dominate their thoughts in order to understand the writer’s perspective. Barbara Tuchman explains that books are the foundation of life’s disciplines because “books are humanity in print”. We read books to understand other people’s culture, struggle, and perspective, but only if we desire to understand.…

    • 1523 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Researchers need both qualitative and quantitative analysis for the fullest understanding of social science data…

    • 519 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Postmodernist approach to action research actually encourages you to include your doubts and struggles into your work. It is not necessary to be objective and dispassionate as a researcher and gives freedom to your own thinking and writing and enables you to be more experimental with your work. Being a postmodern researcher opens up to the possibility of incoherent and disconnected data and can become like a ball of string being tossed around a room and watching it unravel and tangle (MacNuaghton et al 2010, p.296, 298). I subscribe to this approach.…

    • 816 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Michael Postman is making a case against social science, he rejects the idea that social scientists do science. Science is often attributed as natural or physical science. As its name implies, this science is concerned with the study of nature – the physical and natural behaviors and phenomena without the social, cultural, or the human context or aspect. Physical and natural science works in a closed system where variables can be controlled, and the work is executed within a particular framework.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Instead, we bind ourselves with verification and falsification principles, and try to order knowing in such a way that we may make it static because we aspire to omnipotence, and limiting how to know and what can be known is akin to holding a torch in the vast darkness of it all. The light aids but it should never leave us ill-equipped to traverse the dark spaces. The debate between constructivists and naturalists, need not undermine one position or the other. The fact that naturalism has claimed a more prominent position in social science research simply means that what we need to know now, is best served through this methodology. And one day this will change, because knowing is constantly evolving and reshaping itself, in much the same way that we are. As much as the ontological and epistemological leanings of each is distinct, we have already begun to see shifts in the way that both constructivism and naturalism are utilized, especially as it relates to the expansion of the feminist approach, indigenous methodologies and even participatory action research. What is required of us now, as researchers, is being humble enough to recognize the limits of our capacity to know, explain, predict and encourage a plurality of…

    • 1799 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ABSTRACT: (1) The social sciences make use of scientific method, experimental repetition, and peer review to help account for the complexity of their subject matter. (2) The scientific method helps organize research and form testable claims about subject mater. (3) Experimental repetition helps ensure findings in an experiment are attributable in other cases (or at least, to what degree). (4) Peer review helps preserve soundness of method in interpreting and handling of data. (5) All of these aid the social scientist in dealing with their subject; and whatever the social phenomena.…

    • 1081 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In response to Heidegger’s ontological approach towards hermeneutics and understanding, Gadamer’s question is how can we move past the “ontological obstructions of the scientific concept of objectivity and do justice to the historicity of understanding.” One way forward for Gadamer was in overcoming the primacy of self-consciousness. He argues that all understanding is interpretive. For theological method this means that theologians have to examine the roles of understanding when developing their models.…

    • 72 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gnostic Evil

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Therefore, they offer a constructivist criticism, similar to postmodern scepticism towards any kind of essentialist logic. As Kripal (2007) suggests, 'mystically speaking, postmodernism is certainly promising' (9), and this is particularly true in regard to postmodern identification of the illusory nature of all totalising systems. Crucially, in writings of Jean Baudrillard (1983; 1987; 2002)―a notorious figure from the post-structuralist camp―we find the current condition described as a fusion of the real and the hyperreal. 'Gnostic Baudrillard', as Jonathan Smith's (2004) views him, describes the Demiurgic universe as a simulacrum of higher spheres, and suggests that unless we look within ourselves, we cannot move in the external world of simulated…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Postmodernism is the way people think and denies absolute truth. The belief of postmodernism is found through one’s own personal experience and culture. Postmodernism denies the ultimate reality and raises concerns among postmodernist as they deny God as the ultimate source of all that exists. This is not surprising as in certain social areas of life many lean towards postmodernism. Many chose to accept postmodernism ignorantly and only join the bandwagon of modern societies covetousness. Those who chose postmodernism only do so because others are doing it. Therefore, the objective of this research paper is to show that the Christian worldview is far superior to that of a postmodern worldview. This paper will start by providing…

    • 213 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The science of studying a person’s “lived-experience” or, phenomenological research, requires a researcher to delve into an individual’s apprehensions about issues which have caused turmoil to the psyche of the person (Sanders, 1982). A phenomenological researcher focus is the transcendental experience of the person; it is based not on observable data, but rather the unobserved aspect of a person’s perceived experience.…

    • 1081 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the choice of research methodology, the researchers first have to choose one of the research paradigms like positivism, interpretivism, and pragmatism. Every research approach must follow the way of investigation such as epistemology, ontology, and axiology (Maxwell, 2005) as the essence of research philosophy. Therefore, I would like to follow the viewpoint of pragmatism as my research approach that should overcome some disadvantageous position of positivism and interpretivism, discussed below-…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays