Heidegger's Response To Gadamer In Overcoming The Primacy Of

Improved Essays
In response to Heidegger’s ontological approach towards hermeneutics and understanding, Gadamer’s question is how can we move past the “ontological obstructions of the scientific concept of objectivity and do justice to the historicity of understanding.” One way forward for Gadamer was in overcoming the primacy of self-consciousness. He argues that all understanding is interpretive. For theological method this means that theologians have to examine the roles of understanding when developing their models.

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In Meditations on First Philosophy Rene Descartes attempts to reconcile a Christian metaphysics with a new epistemology contrary to the scholastic, Aristotelian worldview. He seeks new foundations that knowledge can be built upon and tries to accomplish this by identifying basic, indubitable axioms to derive more complex truths by. As Descartes had a background in mathematics and geometry, these tenets are proposed alike mathematical truths in that they are self-evidential. He calls these axioms ,”clear and distinct perceptions”. For the Cartesian epistemology and metaphysics to be plausible, these perceptions must be not only epistemologically privileged, but also universal and justifiable as mathematical truths are, in terms of semantics and self-evidentiality.…

    • 1169 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Descartes fifth Meditation presents the Ontological Argument for God’s Existence. Though many people find Descartes Ontological Argument for God’s Existence to be an unpersuasive and weak argument, I find it is a very strong argument that provides a strong foundation and argument for God’s existence. In this paper I plan to elaborate upon Descartes fifth meditation and slightly over the first and third. After this I will then explain its strong points and weaknesses. I believe Descartes Ontological Argument for God’s Existence in Meditation five to be a strong and persuasive argument.…

    • 1477 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    According to John C. Cavadini’s article, “Why Study God?” in Commonweal, this “witness” is meant to represent the teaching that occurs in a classroom, where the students are able to be exposed to the knowledge that allows them to have an intellectual conversation on questions that encompass human life in a rational fashion without having faith prohibited from the discussion (17). Robinette may consider these deliberations as part of his third main point, where he mentions the importance of dialogue. According to him, an important process to understand theology and “animate the present text” is to converse in order to make “these questions more explicit and rigorous” (Robinette 35-36). These verbal exchanges provide students a gateway into engage in a centuries-old discourse, allowing them to question, reflect, as well as acquire and provide any new insight to unearth more truths.…

    • 760 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    However, this does not call on him to relinquish his own commitments. On the contrary, only his commitments allow him to see the truth in other religions, as he can compare their teachings using the Christian ones as a criterion of how we should think about God. Hence, even if a similar analysis of religion was built from a non-Christian point of view, it would have to have analogous assumptions in seeing the necessity of understanding themselves in the broader context of human religiosity, and in seeing the non-ultimacy of their own representations just as they expand them in order to increase their explanatory power. Therefore, differing narratives from Schelling’s one might come to see some truth in Christianity, as their proponents would observe the Trinity and the monotheistic dogma as less-than-perfect representations of whatever that tradition holds in God’s place. Hence, different perspectives, each presuming the superiority of a different tradition do not imply necessarily the complete exclusion of or disregard for other traditions.…

    • 689 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    An integral part of philosophy, and the philosophy of mind, is the study of epistemology. Each of the philosophers studied this term have varying approaches of the study of knowledge. Tyler Burge is no different in this circumstance. In Reason and the First Person, Burge does not clearly state what his idea of knowledge is, nor does he provide much of his opinions on the importance of knowledge. A large part of Burge’s ideas of epistemology are shaped by the philosophy of the mind, and the idea that knowledge develops concepts of knowledge of the first person, and reasoning.…

    • 1637 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In sum, this paper has argued that human beings are interpretive creatures by following Charles Taylor’s argument. That is, human beings sense the things, such as situations they face and emotions they feel, through their respective subject-referring imports. The subject-referring imports are hugely affected by their own culture, language and vocabulary which enable them to articulate their feeling, desires and aspirations, and their situation in several ways. Based on the imports, human beings perceive what is good and bad, what is desirable and what is not, and the concept of human beings: who they are. Indeed, human beings are self-interpreting creatures who could sense the world only through their imports.…

    • 266 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this paper I will dispute that Anselm’s ontological argument is dependent on Anselm’s personal faith in God. My argument lies within the premises that Anselm offers, it would not be rationally acceptable to create content of a maximally perfect being unless the person already accepted the Christian faith. The premises for Anselm’s argument can only be held if the only conception of non greater (relative to his attributes and worldly design) is God but if one does not follow such religious paths how can it be god. So in a sense god wouldn’t exists since you can’t have a mere conception of god without prior experience or impression of him. I will engage this scope of criticism by touching on Humean concepts and conveying how Anselm faith structured…

    • 442 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    St. Anselm Analysis

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages

    St. Anselm, an Italian monk, first initiated the ontological argument. He was a firm As a firm believer in God and hoped to prove and share his strong faith on God’s existence by using logic and reason. He defines God as ‘something than which nothing greater can be thought.’ Anselm states that there is a difference between understanding God as a concept and understanding him to exist. To back up this claim he uses the analogy of a painter.…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The question argued, is about the claim that all understanding involves interpretation, and that all interpretation is inherently perspectival. I will talk about Nietzsche’s claim that all truths are “errors”, Gadamer’s view that all understanding involves interpretation, his notion of “effective historical consciousness” and Schott’s critical stance when finally, I will add my own personal thoughts on how understanding involves interpretation. Nietzsche says that all truths are “errors” that human beings find useful. He states that “Truth is the kind of error without which a certain species of life could not live.…

    • 1648 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The Relationship Between Three Existential Ideas from Heidegger’s Being and Time to the Life of Colleen, a Junior at Fairfield University This essay highlights Martin Heidegger’s work and his ideas of “being-with,” “inauthentic Da-sein,” and “the they.” After explaining these existential ideas, the essay demonstrates the relationship between these ideas and the academic, athletic, and social life of Colleen, a junior at Fairfield University. The paper displays how significant these aspects are to her life, in the sense that these are aspects of her life she prioritizes and puts the most effort towards. Colleen tries authentically “being with” her friends and family and avoiding being an “inauthentic Da-sein” by not giving into the standards of “they they” although it is easier said than done. Finally, the essays portrays how the “average” everyday “chatter” of internet video, student gossip, and texting frequently disable Colleen to the level of what Heidegger calls being an “inauthentic” Da-sein in her academic, athletic, and social activities.…

    • 1898 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Heidegger Understands Your Feelings In The Basic Problems of Phenomenology, Martin Heidegger elaborates on Kant's understanding of the self as “personalitas moralis” by declaring, “Kant's interpretation of the phenomenon of respect is probably the most brilliant phenomenological analysis of the phenomenon of morality that we have from him”.1 While Heidegger admits that Kant's interpretation of respect is brilliant, he also concludes that Kant did not go deep enough into the analysis of respect. Heidegger argues that, “What is phenomenologically decisive in the phenomenon of feeling is that it directly uncovers and makes accessible that which is felt”.2 However, the phenomenon of feeling does not perform this act through intuition. Instead,…

    • 342 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Explain the aim and the argument (or one of the arguments) of the ‘transcendental deduction of the categories '. Emmanuel Kant wrote “The Critique of Pure Reason” where transcendental deduction falls under and is arguably one of his most difficult works. Of central focus in this essay is explaining the aim of the transcendental deduction of the categories with reference to one of the arguments proposed by Kant. Transcendental deduction aims to show how we can know that experience conforms to the categories. The argument that I will propose of Kant’s that answers in this essay is objective validity.…

    • 1571 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    While many philosophers at the time believed in Universals as “realism,” Abelard challenged this concept with his own of Conceptualism. For Abelard, he believed that Universals were not real in the way Plato said, but they did hold larger meanings than just a concept or a word. To many educators at this time, including William of Champeaux, Abelard’s ideals were unacceptable. On the contrary, the church never found his writings of conceptualism to be unorthodox. If they had, Abelard would have rejected his own beliefs.…

    • 1671 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Thinking is inseparably interwoven into human nature. Nearly everyone ponders about various things: school, work, what to eat for dinner. Yet, as every college student knows, the difference between the thinking involved in solving a differential equation and the thinking involved in searching for a potential romantic partner is like the difference between day and night. In his speech, “Memorial Address”, the renowned German philosopher Martin Heidegger explores two forms of thinking that he labels “calculative thinking” (Heidegger, "Memorial Address" 46) and “meditative thinking” (Heidegger, "Memorial Address" 46). Calculative thought is the detached, rational type of thinking responsible for helping one solve an engineering problem or determine…

    • 1654 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Science and religion are two words that are assumed to oppose each other due to the factual, logical basis of science and the faith in the unknown presented in religion. Yet these two disciplines share many commonalities and interactions that lead to the development of a field of study. Alfred White Northhead, a Protestant theologian, exceptionally expressed that God and nature work as one, indicating any change in the science nature, should lead to an alteration with how society comprehends God. (Olsen, 2) Throughout this paper it will be clear that science and religion are a field due to the commonalities the disciplines share, the overlap of knowledge seen in both topics and importantly the dispersion of the work among academics.…

    • 1469 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays