State Institutions: Comparing Norway And Ethiopia

Amazing Essays
The Significance of State Institutions:
A Comparison between Norway and Ethiopia
There are several different ways in which a state can choose to govern its citizens. The two types of government that are frequently analyzed and structurally oppose one another are authoritarian versus democratic regimes. The main difference between a democracy and an authoritarian regime is that a democracy is comprised of a government that reflects the wants of its citizens. On the other hand an authoritarian regime consists of a government that has unwavering control over its population. There is an ongoing promotion for democracy to be universally adopted as the dominant form of government. This promotion of democracy has not been fully successful due to there
…show more content…
The Freedom House is, “an independent watchdog organization dedicated to the expansion of freedom and democracy around the world.” (Freedom House 2016). If a state is democratic it will receive a lower score and the freedom status will be classified as ‘free.’ Ethiopia’s freedom status is ‘not free.’ It has a freedom rating of a 6.5. Another way to look at how democratic a country is to examine the political and civil rights score a state is given by the Freedom House. Again the lower the score the more democratic a state is. Ethiopia has a political rights score of a 7 and a civil liberties score of 6 (Freedom House 2016). The poor scores Ethiopia received can be attributed to the political instituion of Ethiopia as the Freedom House reports it, “recognizes that freedom is possible only in democratic political environments where governments are accountable to their own people.” Ethiopia is a country that represses political and civil rights which has led to citizens not being able to discuss their concerns or needs. Another way in which Ethiopia is a weak instituion is because of its high level of corruption. According to the Freedom House, “corruption remains a significant problem in Ethiopia. EPRDF officials reportedly receive preferential access to credit, land leases, and jobs.” A strong political instituion does not put the public interests second or seek to only benefit themselves. “Political corruption…common in countries where democratic institutions are weak or absent. Private rather than public interests dictate policy” (Transparency International 2016). Ethiopia does not have a constructive political instituion because it is lacking within its leadership to utilize the resources available to the country to work in the interests of its

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    However, democracy has many challenges that contour viewpoints on this type of government leading people to question if democracy is the universal government. Democracy is defined as a system of government by the whole population (the people) or all eligible constituents. There are two types of democracy: Direct and Representative. Direct democracy is where the…

    • 1511 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Democracy is a system of government where citizens play a key role. Depending on the form of democracy, citizens can either pass laws themselves, or elect representatives to do so for them. Direct democracy is a form of government where citizens get together and vote directly for laws. Representative democracy is a form of government in which people elect representatives who will vote for them in the government. There are many similarities and difference between the two, but in the end their structuralization separates them apart.…

    • 1009 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Essentially, citizens must obey the decisions of the elections, provided that they are fair and free and winning politicians must not bar their opponents from future competition and that the losers must concede victory to their opponents if they win in a free and fair election (Schmitter &Karl, 1993, p.56). Schmitter and Karl also outline various indicators of democracy such as consensus, participation, and access to name a few. Schmitter and Karl end the article with what democracy is not. They are not “necessarily more efficient economically than other forms of government”, they “are not necessarily more efficient administratively”,“ they are not more likely to appear more orderly, consensual, stable or governable than the autocracies that they replace” and “democracies will have more open societies and polities than the autocracies they replace, but not necessarily more open economies”(Schmitter &Karl, 1993,…

    • 1342 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Protracted Conflict Theory

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages

    2.4 Protracted Conflict Theory According to the late Edward Azar, the developer of protracted conflict theory, protracted social conflicts can be characterized by incompetent, provincial, fragile, and authoritarian governments that fail to satisfy basic human needs. He states governments are dominated by the leading identity groups because they are expected to be unbiased and impartial to the power holders within a country. These groups created a crisis of legitimacy in the governance of these countries. For example, from 2002 to 2009, in Central and Eastern Europe post-socialist region (Bulgaria) constitutional conflicts arose concerning opportunities for judicial reform. Apparently, the constitutional and judiciary court expanded their…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Foreign Aid To Africa

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages

    “In this financial year we will be spending at least $1.5 billion on foreign aid and we cannot be sure that this money will be properly spent, as corruption and mismanagement in many of the recipient countries are legend” (Hanson, n.d.). Aid to Africa is presently not helping, but it could. The current way that most of foreign aid is being given/received is not helping a continent that is trying to develop, such as Africa. Much of foreign aid’s problem lies within the impersonal way it was given, and the corrupt way it was received. Although aid still needs to be provided to an extent to help Africa get on their feet, the way aid is presented needs to be changed.…

    • 1871 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Monarchy Vs Government

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Each of these different democratic governments are based on the main ideas of democracy along with government conditions. There are some major differences between monarchy and democracy. Some of the differences are that, democracy is that the government is made by the people and monarchy is a rule by a king, queen, or an emperor. For ‘head’ leadership, democracy is elected by the people, and monarchy is passed down from generation to generation. The laws that are in the government, in democracy the people and the government make the laws, in a monarchy the king makes the law.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Different parts of the world have different political regimes and not many succeed in achieving being called a democratic state. In 2016 democracy is the political regime that the most powerful countries in the world follow. The list includes Norway, U.S.A, Germany and Sweden. Progressively, many countries are working on becoming a democracy. Some are being more prosperous, others struggle.…

    • 1147 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    There are world issues that cannot be resolved by individual states alone. Attempts of international governance were seen within the League of Nations, and now the United Nations. The United Nations (UN) is an intergovernmental organization, not a world government, but the possibility for it to transform to one is not unlikely. The United Nations has its fair share of success and failures, but whether the movement towards a world government is a good idea or not is debatable. In the case for a world government, world issues continue to move and affect people even if the UN does not.…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Modes Project: Democracy/ 5 Modes of Democracy Definition: Democracy Democracy simply is “a form of government in which people choose leaders by voting” ,according to Merriam- Webster. However, that simple definition is just the building platform for the many ideas that other philosophers and political thinkers have built on democracy. It is hard to find one sole definition that satisfies each idea of all the philosophers, but there are some common characteristics among most definitions. These include the following: majority rule while maintaining minority rights, individual liberty , and fair elections. Majority rule is commonly used in democracies to make decisions.…

    • 1708 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    J.S. Mill like other political thinkers before him had various issues with government that was ran through a democracy. Overall, I would not say that J.S. Mill is not undemocratic, he instead just fears what majorities would do if they had access to that much power because much of what Mill believes is centered on the personal development of the individual. One of other main concerns with democracy is that with rule by a majority you will in turn sometimes suppress a minority.…

    • 1140 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays