Why Is Eyewitness Testimony Important

Eyewitness testimony is critically important to the justice system. Undoubtedly, it is necessary for every single criminal trial to reproduce facts from past occasions, and eyewitnesses are usually very important to this effort. First, to establish what is an eyewitness testimony. It refers to a statement given by a person of an event they had witness. The most important foundation for eyewitness testimony is a person's memory - all things considered, whatever testimony is being accounted for is coming from what a person recollects. The facts that are proposed by other proof and to fill in missing holes in the account of an accident, crime, or different occurrences. In any case, this can be an issue, because of the human function of memory: the difference between short-and long-term memory, the procedures associated with making and fortifying memory, and different ways that can be used to bring out memories, yet are not generally dependable. This paper will look at and investigate the issues related with memory and eyewitness testimony. The greatest undertaking of the assessment of the eyewitness testimony is the choice of the right information, since memories can be twisted. This is the thing that makes the eyewitness memory fundamentally problematic for the court. It's a given that there are both accurate and inaccurate eyewitnesses. All things considered, the likelihood of getting an inaccurate testimony is still rather high and it's extremely dangerous because of the way that a wrong individual can be placed in prison simply because somebody gave "inaccurate" information concerning the case. The jurisdiction system isn't the place for might theories and people can sometimes be objective towards what they have seen previously. People tend to add and to alter what they saw and they do it unknowingly. It occurs because of the curious probabilities of the memory. The mind intuitively "fills in the holes" of memory and through this makes new case-points of interest. These subtle elements customarily are not right at all. Actual perception and memory don't have much in common, as facts are blurred, overlooked or replaced by other facts. Any reproduction of a given occasion is frequently joined by slight changes in the declaration which can move toward becoming markers of the lack of quality of the eyewitness event and certainty memory. The accuracy of the eyewitness statement isn't steady and subjectivism decreases the accuracy of the certainties to zero. An …show more content…
There are four factors that inquiry the reliability of the eyewitness testimony. They are the attributes of human perception, the conditions under which the observation happens, the particular character of the memorization and the memory peculiarities, and the character and the conditions under which the reproduction of the perceived information takes place. All these four conditions can with no uncertainty be known as the shortcomings of the process of the eyewitness testimony. The qualities of human perception suggest the physiological constraints of the people, any deformities of the perception organs and the orientation of the perception, vulnerability to various irritants, the psychological setting on impression of the individual and the comprehension of his own attitude towards the perceived facts. The conditions under which the perception happens underline the significance of the psychological condition of a persons at the moment of perception, the length and the environment of the procedure of observation, physical condition of perception, for example, distance, audibility, and any