ISIS Case Study

Improved Essays
In term of Obama’s action, he did withdrawed American troops in Iraq but not totally due to keeping of some for battle ISIS. This can be considered that American soldiers who came to the Iraqi mission in 2003 was backed home. U.S force in Iraq now is fighting with ISIS not Iraqi government. ISIS is another actor which is not backed by Iraqi government or totally controls in Iraq. It is an extremist terrorist group controls a part of Iraq and Syria (Hashim, 2014). Target of U.S troops in Iraq is ISIS not Iraqi president as in 2003. Moreover, Obama lauched new mission attack ISIS different from Bush invasion Iraq in 2003 in terms of millitary plan. In Iraq invasion 2003, marine and ground troops was used as major military strategy (Walsh, 2013). …show more content…
As a result, the invasion in 2003 and countering ISIS is not relevant and criticizing Obama in this perspective is not suitable. In addition, the promise of Obama and changing plan of withdrawing American troops illustrated his creative strategy. Iraqi people suffered from war over ten year from 2003, the ending of long war is a desire of them. The new Iraqi government would also build a new state in the perspective of Iraq was destroyed in the long time. For these reason, Obama’s promise about the stoping of war is a method in order to guarant a positive future for Iraq and the presence of U.S army in Iraq for countering ISIS is also an assistance to government to escape from chaos. Iraqi asking for U.S assistant in the battle with ISIS was an evidence of Obama’s foreign policy success in Iraq. Facing with the danger of ISIS, Iraqi government asked for U.S help (BBC, 2014). That also demonstrated an important role of U.S in Iraq. As Afghanistan case, Iraqi government still depend on U.S and it is an opportunity of maintaining U.S – Iraq relationship post Saddam era in order to become a new chessman of U.S in case of countering ISIS was …show more content…
However, ISIS now becomes a new threat of U.S national security. As a result, countering ISIS is necessary with Obama administration. Nevertheless, best strategy to deal with ISIS is great concern of U.S. As mentioned above, U.S deployed airstrike and let Iraqi government play as central role to attack ISIS; mostly U.S troops in Iraq are advisers. Furthermore, U.S also trained Kurdish soldiers because Kurd lived in the North of Iraq that near the controlled area of ISIS and Kurdish people conflict with ISIS (Parkinson & Nissenbaum, 2014). However, it is not enough to defeat ISIS, U.S must cooperate with other actors. Pick up and choose is a new question of Obama administration for a chessman to attack ISIS. Although ISIS is Sunnis terrorist group (Stern & Berger, 2015) and Shiite conflicts with Sunnis, Iran and Hezbollah are a dilemma. Iran has a large of Shiite Muslim and Hezbollah also fight with ISIS (Hilleary, 2015). However, they may bring a challenge for U.S. Firstly, Iran was backed by Russia and China, thus, it is not active in case of cooperating with U.S. Secondly, to gain the cooperation with Iran, U.S must loose economic sanctions and the nuclear program of Iran. Therefore, it is an opportunity for Iran to develop its nuclear weapons. Thirdly, Hezbollah is also another terrorist group and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Iraq War Realism

    • 1099 Words
    • 4 Pages

    After the ambush, there were claims that Saddam was providing military help to Al-Qaeda (The Weekly Standard, 2003). This had aggravated the need to go to war and increase security. During the war, US successfully removed the regime of Saddam and confirmed that there were no possession of WMDs were to be found. Critics may say that if WMDs were not found, why did US still go through to war? As a realist, the two most important things to the state would be security and power.…

    • 1099 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Iraq War Analysis

    • 2281 Words
    • 10 Pages

    As a superpower, national interests and international influence are a great concern of U.S. Wars can be a tool to achieve goals. Afghanistan and The Iraq war were considered as these two strategic cards of U.S. The United States invasion of Afghanistan in 2001 was a response to 9/11 event – an action that was suspected by U.S is of terrorist group Al-Qaeda in order to prevent other security threat to U.S (BBC, 2016). Iraq war was launched in 2003 as a pre-emptive war because of the claim that Saddam Hussein government sponsored for terrorism and had weapons of mass destruction although there were no evidences (Benson, Brannen & Valentine, 2009). Besides victories such as: overthrowning Saddam Hussein and Taliban, eliminating Ossama Bin Laden…

    • 2281 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Defeating Communism

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Between 1945 and 2001, the perceived national interest of defeating Communism took precedence over the real national interest of promoting Americans’ physical and economical security. The United States entered wars in Korea, Vietnam and Afghanistan because they believed preventing the spread of Communism was necessary to protect the American people. However, the success of the wars did not dictate American success in the overall Cold War. Professor Brands suggested that American leaders rally the people against a singular enemy to focus foreign policy on one mission at a time. Once the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991, the United States needed to find a new enemy.…

    • 847 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States believe we must go to war and “Degrade and ultimately destroy ISIL, through a comprehensive and sustained counterterrorism strategy” (Whitehouse). I believe we should not deploy our troops, or our country into the middle of the Syria’s civil war. To begin, we just got out of a war with the Middle East. In the beginning if the terrorist group from Iraq never attacked us we would have never gone to this war. As an American we must fight for our country, since they attacked us on our soil, then it is our duty to retaliate and show them what we are made of.…

    • 1168 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Liberalism In Iraq

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages

    “Realism reflects a view of the individual as primarily fearful and power seeking.” (Mingst and Arreguin-Toft, 76). This can be seen when Saddam Hussein tried to invade two of his neighbors. It was fearful when he invaded Iran because of Iran’s Shia majority population as well as equal military strength, while the invasion of Kuwait can be seen as an expansion of Iraqi power and authority. But when it comes to the 2003 United States invasion of Iraq it could be seen as an attempt to assert American power and influence over that part of the world. “Power, in turn, is primarily thought of in terms of the material resources” (Mingst and Arreguin-Toft, 76).…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    ISIS Synthesis Essay

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Intro (G) The United States (US) should no longer support the various groups in the Iraq-Syria region who oppose Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS). Instead, those groups should deal with ISIS themselves. The history and violence of ISIS has been a prime example of why intervening in the conflict abroad will threaten security of the United States. The rest of the introduction should summarize (or at least introduce) the key points of the rest of the piece. Historical Background (M+Z) Originating as a splinter group that pledged allegiance to Al-Qaeda in 1999, it did not gain prominence until 2014, when it referred to itself as the Islamic State.…

    • 1559 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    ISIS Conflicts

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Now America is taking action, but not fast enough. We have been told by President Obama that we are dealing with a manageable problem, although he will not make a decisions on how to attack or strike. The United States is now in this war to finish the mission, this new war that the government has put us in is going to be a long haul. We need to continue by striking Syria, this may take weeks, months, or years, but we need to finish what we have begun. Terrorist in the world have been seen as large and small, we are now dealing with ISIS.…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Counter terrorism strategy against the ISIS/ISIL, I like make some recommendation that can prevent our society from the further destruction. In this typical issue, the U.S. strategy should focus on collective action, basically with nation states, peace leaders, multi-national organizations, and the United Nations. First, we should realize the fact that how ISIS has emerged. People joined the group because they were unhappy with the U.S. intervention in Iraq. They felt themselves as politically depressed by Shia majority, eventually they want to get back the power.…

    • 1809 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    War Argumentative Analysis

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Thus the victory as a proper outcome to be expected of the use of American arms was intractable for the duration of the cold war, for the reason of the sensible fear of the escalation of nuclear holocaust. In nuclear age, it is dangerous to compel our enemy to do our will. So, the only kind of conflict that the United States dared to wage in the nuclear era was limited war. For instance, fear was clear during Vietnam War, where nuclear option was expelled from US strategy during the war, although the US was losing the war and nuclear power could be its only way to achieve its political outcome. Fearing that the nuclear escalation in that war will lead to total war with china, who had established nuclear test a year earlier, or USSR who have been already in the nuclear club.…

    • 1613 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The other driving factor of the Busch doctrine that the book focuses on for causing a more dangerous world is that of the preemptive actions that President Busch has taken to stop proliferation to countries. The doctrine that the United States has adopted means that they must act before enemy nations have the capability or are in possession of nuclear weapons. This is particularly the case for countries that harbour terrorists. Schell uses the example of the Iraq invasion of 2003 and how that was how the USA invade on the suspicion that they had nuclear weapons, this in fact was false. Yet regime change was implemented.…

    • 831 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics