How Was Feudalism Reflected In The Song Of Roland

Improved Essays
Some medieval literature used feudalism as a way to motivate medieval people. Feudalism is defined in the Merriam-Webster dictionary as “a social system that existed in Europe during the Middle Ages in which people worked and fought for nobles who gave them protection and the use of land in return” (Merrian-Webster). Feudalism was a Christian system that was sanctioned by God and took place between 500 A.D. to 1500 A.D. in medieval Europe. A reciprocal relationship existed between the nobility, the peasants and the clergy where land was given in return for service or labor, and each group had its own set of expectations and obligations. For example, a lord was responsible for providing safety to the serfs and the serfs had an obligation to …show more content…
A vassal was a person who was granted land by a king in return for the vassal’s promise to provide military service and protection to the king. The king inherits all his lands and is a representative of God, therefore by obeying and following the king, the vassal was honoring God. The king was responsible for giving his vassals land but he also rewarded his vassals by sharing in any riches gained during war. The vassal and king relationship was one of loyalty and mutual respect with the vassal swearing to protect the king with his life. “The most honorable role for any man was to be a vassal and serve a worthy lord and since one would get the impression that Charlemagne was chosen by God, that means these vassals were serving both tiers of the hierarch” (Smith). Charlemagne was a Christian king waging war against the pagans lead by King Marsilion because the pagans did not want to be converted to Christianity. Roland was not only King Charlemagne’s nephew but he was also one of king’s most loyal vassal. Roland took an oath of fealty, knowing that one day he might die in battle. An example of a vassal’s loyalty to the king is when Roland agrees to go as a ambassador to King Marsilion. Marsilion had previously lied about his intent to convert to Christianity and when King Charlemagne had sent messangers to discuss conversion, Marsilion had them executed. Roland knew that King …show more content…
Right after 9/11, many people joined the military to fight against the al-Qaeda. Patriotism was at an all-time high and unfortunately all Muslims were seen as pagans and if they could be not be converted then they needed to be killed. Religion has also become an issue of content where some radicals will fight to the death for God. The Muslims and the Christians are still fighting the holy war they started centuries ago. Some militant Christians use God as a shield while they spew hate for a person’s right to choice a faith, a right to life or even a right to bear arms. Radical Muslims are promising their followers that if they become a suicide bomber and take as many non-believers with them, they will go straight to heaven and be surrounded by maidens. This holy war might take us to World War Three, where instead of finding ourselves winners on earth, we may annihilate everybody on

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He subdued and reigned over his enemies all throughout modern day France and well into the neighboring lands that would become Spain, Italy and Germany. This titan of ancient times is often remembered only by his conquests, but the accounts of Einhart and Notker show him in much more depth and color, leaving the readers with a well fleshed out, multifaceted mental image of the man behind the conquest. To define Charlemagne by his trials helps present him in stark terms. He was a man of staunch faith who worked hard for its propagation. In contrast to his love of Christianity, Charles’ apparent self-adulation provides a new dimension showing a seeming contradiction of what was, at once, a godly man and a king driven by his love of self.…

    • 913 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charles The Great Dbq

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Charlemagne or Charles the Great is most famous ruler of the Middle Ages. He lived ca 742-814 and ruled over the Frankish kingdom which covered Belgium, France, Luxembourg, the Netherlands and a part of western Germany. He went on to conquer much of western Europe, all under a policy of friendship and cooperation with the Christian Church. He therefore greatly contributed to the expansion of the Christian Church’s power. He also introduced the basis of Feudalism and revived the political and cultural life of Europe after the fall of Western Rome.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Written circa 826, Einhard’s Life of Charlemagne provides historians with rare insight into Emperor Charlemagne’s inner circle and intimate details of his life. Intended to commemorate Charlemagne’s character and achievements, Einhard’s document also delves into the nature of Charlemagne’s empire, examining which political strategies helped or hindered the Frankish Empire’s formation. In regards to the nature and scope of Charlemagne’s empire, Einhard draws particular attention to the ways in which the Frankish Empire was the continuation and embodiment of old, Roman prestige. However, Einhard ultimately draws attention away from traditional associations of empire and imperialism, instead focusing on a very specific– and often overlooked–…

    • 861 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This shows the way in which Charlemagne approached the running of his empire with dignity and honor and the belief in doing what was right. There is also a similar theme present in Beowulf. After Beowulf returned from the land of the Danes, the King of the Geats was killed. As was custom, the throne proceeded to his son. However, the Queen held “no belief in her son’s ability to defend their homeland against foreign invaders” (Beowulf 2371-2372).…

    • 1061 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Einhard composes Life of Charlemagne in 825 AD with the intention of commemorating King Charles’s well rounded devotion to his kingdom and his family, as he went beyond the expected duties of a King. Throughout the course of his life, Einhard had became very fond of the King and felt it his responsibility to preserve his knowledge of the King’s great deeds subsequent to the King’s death. Einhard provides a detailed piece of writing in which he eternalizes the deeds enacted by the King through which the King’s devotion, to both his kingdom and his family, is reflected. First, Einhard provides some detail about rulers who came before King Charles. In doing so, he provides the reader the opportunity to create a comparison in which King Charles…

    • 1128 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The difference between vassal and lord shows the ranking of power, and the foundation for feudal relationships of medieval history. Idealised views of feudalism represent honorable agreements between a lord and his vassal or vassals in which they both offered their loyalties to one another in exchange for land and services that were usually military in nature. Instead the Agreement between Count William V of Aquitaine and Hugh IV of Lusignan translated by Paul Hyams of Cornell University, demonstrates the tumultuous relationships between vassal and lord for the struggle of having and maintain power and authority. This literary account shows the conflict that formed between Hugh and William. The text depicts the kinds of relationships that had…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Did Rome Fall?

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Pages

    During the fall of the Roman Empire, the government was weakening more and more, funding expensive wars to defend itself and making poor governmental decisions that caused more imbalance within its populace, like taxing the poor and not the rich ("Why Did Rome Fall?," 2010). Additionally, there was the problem with succession that ended rules, peace, and entire empires so many times before. Eventually, the empire fragmented into separate communities, which gave rise to Feudalism. The lack of a strong central government and unity among the empire as a whole allowed numerous local lords to hold power. Feudalism is a hierarchical system that revolved around three different social structures and their obligations to each other.…

    • 208 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Life of Charlemagne is an in depth description of the life works of Charlemagne as told by Einhard, one of his former servants of the court. It is thought to have been written around 825-826 CE. It becomes clear to the reader that Einhard is writing this to praise his former master. He even states that, “Perhaps it will be possible to avoid angering with a new book those who criticize the old masterpieces composed by the most learned and eloquent of men” (136). Einhard makes it known from the beginning he plans to disprove the “haters” of Charlemagne by telling an account of all the wonderful things he did in his life.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Chrlemagne Research Paper

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    He believed that he was helping the Papacy by bringing the barbarians into Christianity and giving the church the lands and money he looted. Lastly, the ultimate justification for Charlemagne’s actions were rooted in the political concept of the Divine Right of Kings. Because of this right, Charlemagne’s power was viewed as coming directly from God himself. To make provide even more validity to this claim, the Pope himself had made Charlemagne emperor. I mean anything is okay if you do it in the name of God and with his blessing,…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Once he had this title, he gained the support of the Christian people. If Charles Martel had lost to the Muslims at the Battle of Tours, the Muslims would have continued to expand into Europe, presumably getting rid of the catholic identity of the Franks and Europe. Also, as Charlemagne promoted the expansion of the Carolingian dynasty, more and more territory was being added and higher portions of land were being put together for the next generation of leaders. The empire would eventually be divided among Charlemagne's three grandsons in the Treaty of Verdun.(Doc H). Soon after, the empire began to collapse and weaken.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    By putting their religion a side, they can focus on fighting the common enemy. “Islam is my religion, but I believe my religion is my personal business. It governs my personal life, my personal morals. And my religious philosophy is personal between me and the God in whom I believe; just as the religious philosophy of these others is between them and the God in whom they believe. And this is best this way”(79).…

    • 673 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Charlemagne as a successful ruler and administrator. He treated his subjects very well and knew when people needed to be punished, when to forgive them, and when to reward them for their actions. He traveled throughout his kingdom in order to exert his power and to help with any issues that may have come about. As a ruler he helped to spread Christianity throughout the kingdom. He made the laws for everyday people clearer and enacted new…

    • 741 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The document reinforces Charlemagne’s powerful, effective, respected status as a Christian warrior by testifying and listing the several victories Charlemagne won. For example, the document includes accounts of his efficient conquest and defeat of the Bretons, the Barbarians, the Welatabians, the Sorabians, the Abodriti, the Bohemians, and his victory in the Saxon War, Bohemian and Linonian wars, and Danes. The multiple forces that tried to rebel, to reject, or to uprise against Charles’ dominion were subdued into obedience/submission using hostages and embassies. For example, in Charles’ defeat of Duke Tassilo in the Bavarian war, Tassilo was forced to surrender himself to Charles, “give him the hostages he demanded, [including his own son Theodo], and promised by oath not to give ear to anyone who should [rebel against Charles’ allegiance].” Additionally, the document even includes relics of people who willingly surrendered to Charlemagne’s rule, such as some barbarous German tribes between the Rhine and the Vistula.…

    • 290 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aeneid and Song of Roland both feature strong, heroic men. Aeneas faced the dilemma in which he needed to have order and needed to find a place to settle and call home, all while Juno brought chaos to his life. Roland on the other hand, had two types of dilemmas one regarded more towards his behavior; he had a temper and was arrogant. The second with his step-father, Ganelon, whom was a traitor to his people. In the end: “… the French advised that Ganelon should die a death of torture” for his treason (CCXI 131).…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Feudalism, England’s alternative to a government during the Middle Ages, played a significant role in the age of war and monarchs, and in some ways continues to have a role in today’s government. The workings of feudalism are simple. A king, or lord, gives land, also known as fiefs, ownership to nobles, also known as vassals, and in return for the king’s overall protection, the vassals would be responsible for providing their support and defense in the form of knights. In reciprocation for their service, knights were given smaller sized fiefs, this was known as subinfeudation. The peasants, or serfs, would do all upkeep of the land.…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays