How Did The Industrial Revolution Affect Society

Improved Essays
Adam Smith believed that the future of England was going to be great due to the all of the benefits that the Industrial Revolution was going to bring to society. He believed everyone would benefit from it no matter what class they belonged to. Smith thought that the workers were going to enjoy the work that they were doing, and would reap the benefits from producing more. This essentially was not the case when Engels visited Manchester. By this time, the Industrial Revolution and its effects on society were in full swing. I believe that Smiths vision of the future didn’t work out because he didn’t realize that the structure of the economy in England made it easy for the upper class to exploit the working class, and didn’t take into consideration some of the flaws of the human race.
I believe that the structure of the economy made it easy for the rich to exploit the working class. All throughout history there are examples of the upper classes in a given society taking advantage of the lower classes, and Smith didn’t consider this a possibility for happening. It’s basic human nature for people to act on their own self-interests no
…show more content…
He thought that the workers would feel a sense of pride and fulfillment from the work that they were doing. This division of labor brought in some of the benefits that Smith was talking about like the increase of productivity, simplicity and efficiency. But he didn’t account for other potential effects that this had on the workers. result in oversimplifying the workers jobs, and essentially made them boring and tedious. This was matched with long and unfair work hours, and the workers were almost treated like animals. They had no time for their families and literally worked their lives away. I can’t imagine that after working their 16 hour shift that they did anything else except go to eat and sleep bracing themselves for the next work

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    Adam Smith and Jean Rousseau both at unique ways at looking at social thought. Smith is the father of modem economics. Smith’s ideas are more focused on relationships between economics and society. Rousseau was a social and political philosopher. His ideas were linked to social unequally within society.…

    • 311 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As the Civil War ended the United States entered the Industrial Revolution. During this revolution the United States changed its focus on reconstructing to modernization. With the expansion of railroads and the rapid growth of industrial cities and manufacturing, the United States was moving towards a more urban and industrial society. During this time it was also known as the “Gilded Age” because money, political corruption, and the economic inequities were major factors that contributed to the growth of the country. Along with this the upper class was growing richer at a dramatic rate while the middle class grew steadily, however the lower class did not benefit much from the industrial growth.…

    • 694 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Mark Alcasid Mr. Ochs World History/Block C 15 December 2014 Essay 1 Thomas Hobbes, John Locke, and Karl Marx were all philosophes who all essentially wanted the same things for society and government, but had their differences on how to achieve those things. Firstly, Thomas Hobbes, was a man who noticed the natural flaws in humanity. He saw that humans naturally live in a more savage lifestyle.…

    • 752 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    The two theorists I will discuss are Adam Smith and Karl Marx, who are both very prominent for their ideas and theories. But are very different in their approach and views and both lived through very different times. Smith lived during the thriving industrial revolution in the 1700s while Marx lived in a bleak London with poor living conditions in the 1900s. Smith focused on the individual, one of his theories was the division of labour which was ground-breaking it has been used as a model in production ever since. For example, Ford motor factories in the 1920s used assembly lines which encompasses this theory.…

    • 1662 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Karl Marx and Adam Smith couldn’t be more different in their views on how economic growth could improve the material well being of the working-class. Marx believed economic growth came at the backs of the proletariat, and that most growth is horded by the bourgeois, only beneficial to the capital elite and added to commodity fetishism. While, Adam Smith believed greater national output was beneficial to everyone, raise all boats with the tide, and increase the wages of the working class, too. The difference lies in the two economists view on whether or not labor is exploited and the role of capital accumulation in that exploitation. It is best to compare Carl Marx’s, The Law of Motion of Capitalism, to Adam Smith’s, Theory of economic Development,…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    The classical political economists shared, to a large extent, a version of an emerging social system. A social systems is the patterned series of interrelationships existing between individuals, groups, and institutions and forming a whole. Every classical political economist such as Adam Smith, Karl Marx, and David Ricardo expect the system to evolve in different characteristics of the system. Smith referred to this as the “society of perfect liberty” with characteristics of, regulation, production, competition, human motivation that organizes the market, “invisible hand” to operate efficiently with minimum government involvement, and the division of labor in the production of wealth. Marx referred to this as “capitalist mode of production” with characteristics of production,…

    • 1812 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Self-interest refers to actions that elicit the most personal benefit. Adam Smith, explains that the best economic benefit for all can usually be accomplished when individuals act in their own self-interest. In a market economy, individuals own most of the resources available, labor, land and capital, and use voluntary decisions, made in self-interest, to control the marketplace. In this type of system, the government plays a small role and the economy is shaped by two forces, self-interest and competition. Self-interest is arguably the single largest motivator of economic activity.…

    • 872 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adam Smith's Ideas

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages

    1. Adam Smith's ideas were typical of most enlightenment philosophers. Like most of his contemporaries he was idealistic and had strong personal opinions. His writings and work were so popular that they are still used today and discussed. Unfortunately, as with many other philosophers, his exact methods and teachings were manipulated into a way he would not approve of.…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Smith explains that division of labor help increases the productivity of labor by breaking down a task into various parts. When workers perform tasks in smaller parts it increased his/her efficiency. In his book the Wealth of Nations, he expressed that there were three benefits of division of labor. First, that it would increase the awareness and cleverness of workers, saving the time required to produce a commodity, and that there would be more innovative machines and equipment to come.…

    • 1971 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Aristotle once stated, “The most perfect political community is one in which the middle class is in control, and outnumbers both of the other classes.” (Politics) Aristotle was the first author to theorize about the middle class, but he was not the only author to do so. Melancton Smith’s ideas of the middle class were similar in the basic ideas to those of Aristotle. He believed the middle class was the most ideal class to run legislature in the United States. Melancton Smith believed that the larger the middle class was, the less likely there was for chaos to form within the governmental system due to the temptations and opinions of those who were rich and in power.…

    • 431 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The oppressed workers began to form union-like movements that demanded certain things for the workers. Similar movements to Britain’s People’s Charter and Marx’s International Workingmen’s Association led rebellions in several areas that stretched all across Europe. The year 1848 saw the biggest chunk of revolts. Revolutions happened in France, Italy, Britain, and Russia (Hunt 709-715).…

    • 563 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adam Smith, The Wealth of Nations, and the “Invisible Hand”: A Metaphor For Ambiguity-Uncertainty Aversion by Decision Makers Michael Emmett Brady Lecturer School of Business and Public Policy Department of Operations Management California State University , Dominguez Hills Carson ,California USA Abstract: Smith’s use of the “Invisible Hand”,as pointed out by Gavin Kennedy, is a metaphor provided for the great percentage of readers of the Wealth of Nations whom Smith realized would not be able to grasp the nature of his argument ,which was about the ambiguity-uncertainty aversion of the majority of 18th century English businessmen. Gavin Kennedy has pointed out that the term,”Invisible Hand”, had nothing to do with Laissez Faire, free…

    • 1375 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Adam Smith is now universally regarded as one of the fathers of economics. He is best known for the profound ideas and novel theories on capitalism presented in his book Wealth of Nations. Some ten years prior to the release of that book, however, he wrote his equally important Theory of Moral Sentiments, which is lesser known and less referred to in political economic literature. That work forms the underpinnings of Smith’s economic theories and conclusions set forth in his now classic Wealth of Nations where it makes certain assumptions of human social behavior. Smith is concerned with psychology and economics and manages to weave them together throughout both books.…

    • 1951 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Adam Smith Theory

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Adam Smith, the father of microeconomic theories, puts faith in a virtually unregulated, free market that maximizes the dynamic efficiency. In his view, an ideal system of market should be based on free competition, increasing size of market, and considerable capital accumulation. He believes the production function is an increasing return to scale that would expand the market, lead to internal and external economies of scale, and ultimately, lower the cost of production. With the foundation of the division of labor, a free market delivers an optimal output of goods that suit consumers’ needs. Nevertheless, Adam Smith’s basic tenet merely offers a restricted and incomplete view of the market optimality, and many later-generation thinkers shed…

    • 1276 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Adam Smith’s “The Wealth of Nations” was an outstanding piece of work both for the fields of Sociology and Economics when it was published in the late seventeenth hundred. In this masterpiece Smith talks of the increase of productivity in society due to the phenomenon of the division of labour and through this division of labour specialisation of skills was introduced. Adam Smith also speaks of the “natural “order of society, exchange, division of labour and the relations between the three ranks of society in the book. This essay will discuss the above mentioned concepts that Adam Smith theorised and give insight into these concepts.…

    • 1318 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays