How Celebrities Can Be Wearing Any Types Of Possessions Rather Than Others

809 Words Oct 5th, 2015 4 Pages
The particular elements that comprise status groups are lifestyles or “the set of conventions and traditions that they have” (Hurst 69). Next is their inclination to marry within their own respective ranks in their group. In addition to that, they overwhelmingly stress the action of interacting intimately with only people that reside within their status group. Moreover, they also characterize themselves by frequent monopolization of economic opportunities, or reassuring their social dominance by persuading their members to buy fancy cars/luxurious homes in specific neighborhoods to solidify their status and standing. Finally, they have “emphasis on ownership of certain types of possessions rather than others” (Hurst 69). An example of lifestyle or traditions can be wearing specific colors or symbols that are associated with that specific group. Marrying within your own group ranks reinforces the emphasis on interacting intimately among themselves, examples of this can be only going out to social events with those people who are of your social status group. The best example can be how celebrities have the tendency to marry other celebrities rather than ordinary people. Buying certain types of possessions rather others distinguishes wealth and buying power which establishes that person’s social status within a community.
The Appalachia serve as an example of both economic and status inequality primarily for two reasons. The first is that since the region is in a lot ways…

Related Documents