Hochswender's Argument Analysis

Improved Essays
I do not find that Hochswender persuaded me to believe that he is not “a bad person” (as cited in Muller and Wiener, 2015), since he drives an SUV. It appears that he has a strong argument. However, the ethical reasoning is faulty.

The argument felt more like an emotional appeal because he talks about wanting his 9 year-old to be safe and about his family responsibilities. I can identify with these responsibilities. This argument tugs at my emotions, because it makes me think of my son. Even the phrases “reasoned individualism” (as cited in Muller and Wiener, 2015) and “intelligent people” (as cited in Muller and Wiener, 2015), which would seem to appeal to ethics, really are about how we feel. You don’t want to feel like a scatterbrained, dummy, do you?
…show more content…
“There is a way that appears to be right, but in the end it leads to death.” (Proverbs 14:12, New International Version). Tv commercials link him to terrorism because of the gas consumption. But, is he good, since he needs the SUV for safety on “steep driveways and miles and miles of dirt roads” (as cited in Muller and Wiener, 2015) as he fulfills his personal responsibilities? Just because your family is starving, does not make it right to steal a steak. “Right is right even if no one is doing it; wrong is wrong even if everyone is doing it.” (Augustine of Hippo as cited in Goodreads, 2017). He is still using Middle Eastern

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    I believe that Hochswender’s essay is persuasive. The reason why I think Hochswender’s essay is persuasive because he makes several statements that lean more toward having an SUV is the way to go. “Four- wheel-drive vehicles allow workers to get to and from their jobs, and parents to transport their children safely to school” (Hochswender 155). This quote states that Hochswender believes that without having a four-wheel-drive vehicle, individuals cannot get from place to place safely. It is safer to be in an SUV than a Corolla when getting into an accident (Hochswender 155).…

    • 252 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    I pull up to this big structure with a parking lot almost full, searching I finally find a spot not too far from the threshold. I gather my things making sure not to forget headphones, as I hear there are flat screens and my favorite show is currently on. As I walk up I meet a friend, as the gym is a new thing to me and I’d hate to go alone. We walk in and immediately notice the smell of pizza… I think to myself, there is a time and a place for everything and this is not the time nor the place especially for pizza.…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Within this essay, I will argue that Galen Strawson’s basic argument, presented in Your Move: The Maze of Free Will, is correct about the impossibility of ultimate moral responsibility. I will do this by first explaining the basic argument as proposed by Strawson, then raising an objection to it concerning the distinction between the self and the way you are by denying the second premise. And finally, I will be refuting the objection. Strawson’s basic argument can be boiled down to the simple notion that one cannot be ultimately morally responsible. He claims that anything you do in any circumstance is an effect of who you are, and the way you are.…

    • 766 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    How fear of nuclear power is hurting the environment, is a title that would spike anyone’s curiosity. In 13 minutes and 58 seconds, Michael Shellenberger crafts an argument about how the fear of nuclear energy is unfounded and nuclear energy should be the go to clean energy of the world. Shellenberger starts off his TED talk by claiming to viewers that we are in the middle of a clean energy revolution. He backs this up through empirical evidence in his home state of California and through the examples of Germany, who gets half of their power through solar energy, and India who has promised to expand their energy from solar to that of 10 times California output. He also cites bill gates working in china with their engineers and those of MIT…

    • 1681 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Husak's Argument Analysis

    • 109 Words
    • 1 Pages

    I think it is difficult to deny the negative behaviors for young people who suffer from addiction. Husak in his argument highlights that young who use heroin will harm themselves only. I believe the idea is very weak because those category of people are considered a part of society. They are not living in a separate area. So, how we can be sure that poor people would not attack innocents in order to get their needs such as money?…

    • 109 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Critical Analysis From the article, Kempner ‘s stands that condom should available at school, she explains how the condom can bring help to students. He also refutes some respondents of interview words that it may cause promiscuous as the student would increase sexual activity. Kempner ‘s argument is credible as she quoted a lot of statistics and studies and he used the persuasive techniques, ethos, pathos and logos to support his argument and to persuade the audience. A journal article posted on Rewire, focus on schools, the target audience are the parents, students, teachers and school administration .…

    • 452 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Summary John Arthurs has a unique stance on world hunger and moral obligation and the way that we should handle these issues. He opens up his argument by analyzing one of Pete Singers rules “If it is in our power to prevent something bad from happening, without thereby sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance, we ought, morally, to do it. “(666) Arthur believes that rule of life is a flawed one. He counters this statement by giving a scenario using Singers moral rule. Arthur states “All of us could help others by giving away or allowing others to use our bodies.…

    • 769 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Heifetz offers three categories in which a person’s loyalties lay, colleagues, community, and ancestors. I have always experienced conflict when it comes to my loyalties to colleagues, community, as well as ancestors. My profession is ministry in a for-profit hospice in addition to the church which overflows into all parts of my life. I am perhaps more devoted to hospice due to the hurt that I have experienced in the church. Hospice affords me the opportunity to do more in ministry then the church.…

    • 784 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Woolf's Argument Analysis

    • 103 Words
    • 1 Pages

    In paragraph five, Woolf makes the argument that being a gifted woman of genius in the 16th Century would have been torturous. Woolf argues that it would be so out of the ordinary due to society's restraints, the endless distractions, and the massive amounts of discouragement experienced by women of that time. Woolf's argument is convincing because she bases it on truths: women lacked female role models, lacked education, lacked economic opportunities. This makes it impossible for the argument to be accepted and valued as a reality. One needs to look to a history book to find Woolf's evidence and find it factual.…

    • 103 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wolff's Argument Analysis

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Wolff’s argument contains a number of premises and intermediate conclusions that sequentially lead to the overall conclusion or purpose of his argument. Wolff begins by stating some simple definitions and distinctions which lead into his first premise. He defines authority as the right to command, and correlatively, the right to be obeyed. He also defines the state as a group of persons who have and exercise supreme authority within a given territory. He explains that a de jure authority is one in which a governments claim to the right to rule is true.…

    • 724 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In order to tease apart the puzzle, Haslanger defines possible meanings of "should believe" (Haslanger, 73-74). There are two senses of "should believe" involved in this puzzle. There is an epistemic "should believe", where one should believe something because it is the truth; and, there is a moral "should believe", where one should not believe something because of moral reasons (Haslanger, 73-74). Haslanger argues that once these two senses of "should believe" are distinguished, the puzzle disappears (Haslanger, 74). So, with regard to the seventh grader, she should believe that crop-tops are cute in the epistemic sense; however, she should not believe that they are cute in the moral sense because morally speaking, her belief harms other women…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Huemer's Argument Analysis

    • 2010 Words
    • 9 Pages

    Huemer argues that a few different arguments that drug war advocates advance are false. One of the arguments Huemer targets is the Harm to Users argument. For this question, lay out the harm to users argument in premise-conclusion form and explain why drug war advocates who like this argument think that each premise is true. After doing this, identify which premise Huemer uses the Howard case to undermine (i.e. identify which premise the Howard case is supposed to show is false). Then, explain the Howard case (i.e. who Howard is, what he does, etc.) and why Huemer thinks the Howard case shows that the premise in the Harm to Users argument is false.…

    • 2010 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Introduction I would like to preface by stating that any of my concerns or questions are merely for arguments’ sake (I struggled to find anything controversial or worthy of objections), as the article is generally straightforward and logically sound. I would like to discuss the following (all of which do not pose any serious problems for Koskenniemi): 1) that consensualism is not necessarily theoretically inconsistent, or that; 2) its inconsistencies does not make it useless in practice; 3) that apologism may be less of a problem that it is depicted; and 4) that the extent of the integration of law and social science in the context of international law might be too much. Notions of Non-Consensualism as a Part of Consent The article listed two…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Humans have been talking to themselves for quite some time, but it was not until fairly recently that psychologists became more interested in this topic and began to seriously research it. One psychologist who is fascinated by human’s inner dialogue is Charles Fernyhough. Fernyhough argues that inner dialogue is beneficial to human development and helps change our perception of how we react to the world around us, and Fernyhough discusses this in his article. He says that having conversations with yourself helps improve your language, changes your viewpoint and how you react to certain situations, and also helps to enhance your problem solving skills. Fernyhough also mentions mental or inner dialogue and how this questioning even dates back…

    • 1507 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Huemer devises the mere addition argument to support Parfit’s repugnant conclusion, but this is not effective in practice because it presupposes important considerations for the argument to work. The mere addition argument relies on the prior belief that world A+ is superior to world A in virtue of total happiness, even though more reliable measurements prove otherwise. Huemer also uses subjective comparisons to justify the superiority of A+, so it is not able to provide a reliable measurement. As a result, the repugnant conclusion does not necessarily follow because Huemer’s first argument cannot guarantee that A+ is a better world. Huemer defended the repugnant conclusion by proposing the mere addition argument.…

    • 817 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays