Hobbes And Forced Labor

Improved Essays
Hobbes saw people as individuals who is septate from one each other. The human nature of man is one that is solitary and not naturally social. He saw each human being as a sovereign individual whose aim is to preserve the life of themselves. Each person has the interest in survival and the strive to ensure their safety, and as a result, individuals strive away from death and towards life, just as a rock falls downward. They live their lives in constant fear of death and violence towards themselves and their property. As a result of man’s constant battle with the outside world, their lives are “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish and short", and as a result, must do whatever is necessary in order to survive. Hobbes also believed that while people are at a constant warring state with the outside world, they also have strengths and weaknesses that create conditions for them to deal with …show more content…
According to Karl Marx, our current capitalistic society is damaging to individuals who work under forced labor in the modes of production because it produces alienation. We are alienated from what we produce, and we are alienated from the modes of production. The most prominent example is when workers work in factories. Workers produce private property by putting all of their creative energy in the form of monotonous tasks into objects that is not for themselves, but instead for people who likely did not put any work into its creation. Worker work in environments that seek to maximize profits, even at the expense of the workers. This leads to dehumanization. Their bodies, their creativity, and their labor are being used as a means to gain capitol for a few who profit from them. Furthermore, those who profit from worker’s labor do not actively participate in the labor. Instead, they control their workers, who are being reduces to cogs in a machine, which makes them feel

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    In an excerpt from Leviathan by Thomas Hobbes, he describes his theory about the conditions of a society which has no governing body to control it. When there is no government, we live in a state of nature; a state of total freedom where we can do whatever we want at any time. If there is no government, there are no set laws, and therefore no limits on human actions. There are also no formal consequences for actions that may cause harm to others. You could do anything you want if it will benefit you since there is no sure punishment.…

    • 1117 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The State of Nature, in Hobbes’s opinion, is the equal opportunities of ability and desire which creates conflict, which makes people enemies of each others. He believes…

    • 2532 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    (1 pt.) Hobbes’s opinions on the state of nature are that people are constantly fighting with others for more power. Hobbes says that the “three principal causes of quarrel” are “competition; secondly, diffidence; thirdly, glory.” He also states that The first maketh men invade for gain; the second, for safety; and the third, for reputation”.. Lastly, he says that this giht for power is like a war between men.…

    • 1724 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Paid Sick Leave Analysis

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Chen describes how this results in the workers experiencing both physical and mental harm to themselves. Marx and Durkheim would view the role of the state differently. Marx’s theories would hold the state responsible for not caring for their workers. Durkheim would see workers that are not effective and productive as a vital part of the societal organism not functioning.…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    government. Hobbes ideas impact our daily lives mainly his belief that states that the people should give up some of their rights to a more absolute power to protect them and regulate the society around them. This idea is known as a social compact or contract that states that, in their natural state, Hobbes believed that people would fight only for their self-interest and attack those who were in pursuit of their interests. The only way to stop people from engaging in this natural act was to create a government that would enforce the law and protect people from their state of nature. Hobbes negative view towards the nature of humans parallels that of the United States Constitution and Declaration of Independence.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The other way of interpreting Hobbes is not without problems either. This takes Hobbes to be saying that we ought, morally speaking, to avoid the state of nature. We have a duty to do what we can to avoid this situation arising, and a duty to end it, if at all possible. Hobbes often makes his view clear, that we have such moral obligations. But then two difficult questions arise: Why these obligations?…

    • 242 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    another’s body... There can be no security to any man” (I, 80, 4), claiming that the state of nature (result of human nature) entails the survival of the fittest, if one is too weak and unable to protect themselves they will perish. If the world were to maintain this warring lifestyle anarchy would ensue. Hobbes expands on human nature and claims that there are three main principals to this ideal; competition of man, diffidence, and glory. Competition entails man using violence to make themselves masters of wives, children, and cattle.…

    • 1336 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Imagine the cardinal pierced by an arrow in a desperate man’s search to satisfy his hunger. Imagine opening the door of your home to find man fighting in man as they seek to justify their ends. Take a moment to imagine it. For Thomas Hobbes, this was a reality. The State of Nature, that…

    • 573 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    To Hobbes, it did not matter what realm man was in – public or private, man would be living in solitude. Also, in stark contrast to Aristotle, Hobbes believed that being a human did not necessitate participating in politics since everyone was born equal. Whereas Aristotle was more concerned with people finding ways to contribute to the greater good and realizing their “duties”, someone following a Hobbesian way of life would wonder what they could get from the state, instead of what they could give to…

    • 1309 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Hobbes viewed the state of nature as a state of war, where everyone is against one another. He believes that men are selfish and egoistic and that they would do anything, whether it is right or wrong, in order to satisfy their desires and passions. Therefore, Hobbes believes in an ideal society there should be a monarch or a group of people who have absolute power over everyone. The sovereign has to be above the law he enforces, he has the right to decide what doctrines might be detrimental to peace, and he has the right to choose minsters and officers to act on its behalf and enforce laws. In other words, according to Hobbes in a perfect society, the monarch has absolute power over the people and they must obey those rules (via the social…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In Anarchism: What It Really Stands For, Emma Goldman states: “Every fool, from king to policeman, from the flatheaded parson to the visionless dabbler in science, presumes to speak authoritatively of human nature”. Thomas Hobbes and John Locke, two of the most influential modern philosophers, presumed to speak authoritatively on human nature. They presumed so much so, that each of the philosophers dedicated the bulk of a novel to discussing their interpretation of human nature. In fact, Goldman herself speaks quite extensively on her interpretation of human nature. Hobbes, Locke, and Goldman fit together nicely on the philosophy of human nature spectrum.…

    • 1170 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    If a man in a Hobbesian State of Nature were presented with the choice of whether to enter into a Hobbesian social contract, would it be in his best interest to do so? In this essay, I will summarize the conditions of both the State of Nature and rule by a Hobbesian sovereign as well as present the benefits and detriments of both states of life. Having presented the facts of the choice, it will be evident that the man in the State of Nature should, according to his best interest, agree to the social contract. The State of Nature which the man is in while being faced with his choice must be made clear before it can be compared to any other state of affairs.…

    • 1608 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    CONTRACTARIANISM INTRODUCTION “Any of the various theories that justify moral principles and political choices because they depend on a social contract involving certain ideal conditions. A general ethical theory, that individuals make the right choices under a hypothetical social contract.” (www.dictionary.com) “Contractarianism, which stems from the Hobbesian line of social contract thought, holds that persons are primarily self-interested, and that a rational assessment of the best strategy for attaining the maximization of their self-interest will lead them to act morally (where the moral norms are determined by the maximization of joint interest) and to consent to governmental authority. Contractualism, which stems from the Kantian…

    • 1057 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Hobbes cared about maximizing liberty, defining social justice, and knowing how to divide the limits of the government power. The process of the state of nature is formed by a community and a government. People would view him as a “Psychological egoist” he was over the top with an unrealistic view of human nature. In the laws of nature and the social contract, “Hobbes thinks the state of nature is something we ought to avoid, at any cost except our own self presentation” (Thomas Hobbes). Hobbes believed in a social contract and how it would help the government rule the society.…

    • 1796 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    When the products of labor and the act of labor itself no longer belong to the laborer, they belong instead to the capitalist the laborer is working for. The laborer cannot help but feel disconnected from the capitalists who own the laborer’s estranged product and labor, and therefore the laborer no longer views the capitalist as a fellow human being. Rather, the laborer feels antagonistic towards the capitalist. The laborer sees the capitalist and the system the capitalist benefits from as the cause of his…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays