Honesty's Role In Preserving The Criminal Justice System

Improved Essays
Honesty, ethics and professionality are one of the main quality’s that are important for individuals in the criminal justice system. Each of these play a main role in preserving intact the criminal justice system as we know it.
A police officer named Jim entered a Sandwich shop during the lunchtime rush. Once in line ready to pay for his meal the owner tells the police officer that payment wasn’t necessary. The officer would be left with the decision of pay or to not. In many cases officers would accept the offer due to it’s a simple form of gratitude for protecting the community and the people living in it. The result of the decision is left to what the officer feels comfortable with. If I was placed in the scenario I would have accepted the
…show more content…
The officer must have probable cause for searching there home. If it states in the probation order that can search the probationer’s home then they can procced with their search. However if it doesn’t state they can search in probation order then the officers must obtain a warrant. When a probation Officer has to inspect on the probationer they will either do the search themselves or be accompanied by a police officer. If the probationer doesn’t want to cooperate then the police officer can arrest them for violating the probation order. The difference between a probation officer and police officer is the officer must follow the fourth amendment to search a probationer’s home. Probation officers can search the home without a warrant if it states they can in the probation order. The fourth Amendment is acceptable in this situation due to they are following protocol of this law. If it wasn’t followed they would be breaking the law and violating the rights that the individual …show more content…
Herring on a warrant that was listed in the neighboring county’s database. When officers arrested him he was found with possession of a drugs and gun He was charged with possession of drugs and federal gun charges. Once the officers had Mr. Herring in custody it was revealed that the warrant had been recalled months earlier, However it was never voided in the database. Herrings arrest was voided and the charges that where against him where dropped on the terms of his arrest was illegal and a violation of his fourth amendment. The police department cited that the officers involved in Mr. Herrings arrest was innocent any wrong doing and stated that it was in fault of Dale county’s for not maintaining up to date records. Ethics played a large role in this case that once the department found out they had made a large mistake they quickly tried to recodify the situation. The police department did the right in protocol but having the warrant not being up to date created a larger situation then it need to be. This goes to show communication and collaboration of the departments of criminal justice system are key to the success of each department. This case reshaped the way that departments keep record keeping. It also allows for the departments to double to check if the information they are given the correct

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    You can use deadly force to protect yourself as long as the intruder has a weapon or is threatening you, to where you feel like that person is going to harm you or your family. A person should not be punished for protected their home or personal belongings, especially if you feel threatened. There is no point in getting shot for living in your own home when an intruder comes in threatening you with your life, you should be able to protect yourself with whatever it takes to keep you and your family safe. Why should you get in trouble for pulling the trigger first? It is written up in the castle doctrine that you basically have to let the person that is trying to harm you make the first move, when sometimes that person might have a gun or a deadly weapon and the first move is not always something that you can come back from.…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Dirty Harry: Film Analysis

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Detective Callahan’s failure to do this in the movie Dirty Harry, resulted in the evidence being inadmissible in the court of law, and in turn the suspect was released from police custody. Therefore, despite a law enforcement officer’s efforts to apprehend a suspect, if legislative laws are broken as well as human rights violated, the case built against the suspect will most likely be thrown out of the court of law. Thus, this is a major obstacle faced by law enforcement officers in bringing suspects to…

    • 1588 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mapp V. Ohio Case Study

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Although if a person is openly in violation of the law and the evidence is in plain view, a police officer can perform a search, without a warrant. While people will fight this and do not like this idea, it is still the law and the police will use this ability to obtain the evidence they want. Also a warrantless search is legal when, the suspect has given consent, the police are already in pursuit of the defendant, or the search is incidental to a lawful arrest. In addition, if police are granted a search warrant by the court and they carry out the search only to find out that the warrant itself was not valid through no fault of their own, the items seize can still be used because the police were acting under good faith and are protected under the good faith exception. While the police are still held to the standard of the law and its requirements to perform a lawful search, citizens should still be aware that their privacy is not formally protected under the…

    • 1223 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although an arrest takes away a person’s fundamental right to freedom, police must still follow proper protocol to carry out a legal arrest. In this case, neither the officer nor the deputy read the arrestees their Miranda Rights. Technically, since the first arresting officer did not interrogate the suspect, he was not obligated to read him his rights. When the detective interviewed the suspect, Miranda Rights were read. In this case the arresting deputy was in the wrong.…

    • 1239 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    One, search incident to lawful arrest; a police officer may search the area surrounding the person within their reach. For example, a person is arrested for driving intoxicated after being pulled over. A vehicle search conducted to find ten grams of cocaine in the glove compartment and a illegal handgun in the trunk. The cocaine is admissible evidence and handgun being excluded because, it was an unreasonable search. Not requiring a search warrant to be issued.…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Fourth Amendment The Fourth Amendment is meant to protect the citizen from unreasonable seizures and searches without a warrant. This includes having their homes, persons, and items in their homes searched by police as well as other officials. Following the Amendment, if a police officer suspects that a citizen has is perpetrating or is taking part in a crime, the office has first to obtain a warrant legally. The warrant has to be granted by a judge before the offer can enter the property of the suspect as he or she searches for evidence. This amendment has been observed to have both negative and negative impact on law enforcement.…

    • 1202 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Exclusionary Rule

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Supreme Court overturned the decision concluding that illegally obtained evidence is inadmissible. Furthermore, the court also added that the officers used brutal force to obtain the evidence from Mr Rochin, a violation of due process. The Court did not make the exclusionary rule relevant in all states cases, but only in those cases of extremely serious police misconduct (Forst & Dempsey, 2011, p.183). I believe that there were different approaches the police could have taken to make…

    • 1087 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The most important, is for an officer to uphold a persons Fourth Amendment Rights, which gives people the right to be safe and secure in their home and are protected from unreasonable search and seizures. Probable cause must be in place to issue a warrant to search a person’s place. If the Fourth Amendment is violated as in the case “Mapp v Ohio any evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth amendment can not be used in a state law criminal case.” (Streetlaworg,2015) Police have to be careful when obtaining evidence and doing searches. Failure to maintain a persons Fourth Amendment Rights can result in evidence to be removed from a case. First, a police officer can stop and question someone on the mere bases of…

    • 706 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction Often the main evidence relevant to the mens rea is the defendant 's state of mind, which only can be obtained by the police interrogation. Nonetheless, corruption among the police officers may not be avoided in such circumstances. In the well – known case of the ' 'Cardiff Three ' ' , the Court of Appeal quashed their conviction as they were proven to be innocent. It was the problematic interrogation that made Stephen Miller confess a crime which he and the other members did not commit. Lord Taylor suggests that Stephen ' 'Miller was bullied and hectored...Short of physical violence, it is hard to conceive of a more hostile and intimidating approach by officers to a suspect. '…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Peradventure, that the police are serving a legal warrant to pick up robbery suspect who also is a known drug dealer, because of the exclusionary rule from Mapp v. Ohio when the police arrive at the suspect address, they are not allow to search the home looking for drugs unless the warrant stipulates. Because of the Supreme Court’s ruling, Mapp v. Ohio complicates law enforcement with bureaucracy and suppresses simple law enforcement.…

    • 598 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays