It states that the world will only improve in the future as science and knowledge will grow. Remarque offers a stark contrast to this theory. In his words, the “keenest brains of the world invent weapons” to make the war “more refined and enduring” (Remarque, 1987, pg. 263). Close to the end of the novel, the narrator is in a hospital and finds that the “culture of a thousand years could not” prevent the wounded from dying (Remarque, 1987, pg. 263). People take the new knowledge and science to imagine innovative technology, so they can kill each other at a faster rate. In many ways, society is attacking itself with the more advanced technology that they believe they desperately need. Remarque’s novel shows that he puts little stock in the Enlightenment Theory of Progress. In fact, the senselessness of war and technological killing shows that more science and technology has made the world …show more content…
In the Great War roughly ten million people died. In the novel, Remarque has Tjaden ask what the purpose of the war is (Remarque, 1987, pg. 205). This is particularly revealing considering that these men have been fighting for years in the trenches for something they do not understand. In the end of the novel, Paul Bäumer, age 20, dies on a day that the military describes as “All Quiet on the Western Front” (Remarque, 1987, pg. 296). This is the main irony of the novel because he died one month before the peace treaty to end the war was signed. The years of war he struggled through were meaningless and in turn the Army made his life meaningless by describing the day he dies as “all quiet,” (Remarque, 1987, pg. 296). This, more than anything else, highlights the epitome of the war’s senselessness and the tragedy found