Atkins makes a convincing argument about contemporary consideration …show more content…
Atkins first shows that Hals’s sitters collect a large amount of quality paintings, which meets the basic definition of Liefhebbers. Then he uses the example of people’s love of grisailles made by Adriaen van de Venne to show that Hals’s sitters have the same refined appreciation, because both Van De Venne and Hals have rough manners, and their audiences are capable of appreciating their artful individual strokes. Also, the sitters are depicted as elegant and cultured in Hals’s rough paintings, suggesting that they have sophisticated tastes. The high quality and considerable quantity of the collections of the sitters, as well as their choice of making Hals their portraiture painter, solidly supported the author’s argument that they are knowledgeable lovers of