Glaucon And Socrates Dialogue

Decent Essays
Plato chooses to write this story as a dialogue between Socrates and Glaucon because he wants to show a philosophical debate. Plato shows a discussion going on between two speakers. He does not try to fabricate fictional stories for his readers. Glaucon's role, as Socrates is making his argument, is like a guru or confidant. Glaucon listens and questions Socrates's explanation as an adviser. For example, Glaucon responds to Socrates's argument with a "very true" or "no question" for most of the passage. He is heedful of what Socrates is conferring

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    1.Opening Discussion: Pgs 61-79 In the opening discussion of Plato at the Googleplex we are introduced to a few of Plato’s philosophical arguments presented in a modern and refreshing way. There are four main characters that persist in this discussion: Rhonda, Cheryl, Plato, and Marcus. Rhonda who is the narrator relays to the reader the encounter her friend Cheryl had with Plato and Marcus at the Googleplex. The opening discussion begins with Cheryl meeting Ronda at a Hotel bar; there she begins to relay her encounter she had with the Philosopher Plato.…

    • 973 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Analysis of Plato’s Dialogue: Meno and Phaedo Introduction Plato wrote almost thirty dialogue, and Socrates is the major character in most of them. Platonic dialogue is a genre involving other texts such as Xenophon’s hiero and Plato’s law, in which Socrates, a wise man leads the dialogues those against each dialogues is Socrates who attempt to find out more about the understanding of other person concerning moral issues Meno In this Plato’s dialogue, the Socrates is faced with some very persuasive arguments with Meno, his another accuser. This dialogue’s main theme consists of the vivid explanation of real virtue by the Socrates utilizing brilliant epistemology.…

    • 824 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Plato shows his respect for Socrates by writing the dialogues so that people in the future could read what he did. He thought he was a great man and mentor and looked up to him in many ways. Socrates offended many people by believing in the oracle, but it wasn’t his fault. It came off as rude that he was telling people that he was the wises, but he was the wisest because he knew what he didn’t know. That is what made him wise.…

    • 1330 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    This essay will look at the lack of cookie-ness of Socrates through how other characters describe him as wise, a satyr, and a statue of Silenus. All characters in the Symposium would agree that Socrates is wise and knowledgeable. In the start of the novel, there was mention of an oracle who was asked who…

    • 971 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although Socrates prepared his speech in the Apology to be used in his defense trial, it seems as if Socrates also subtly promoted a manifesto of values that are quite comparable to the values listed in Connecticut College’s Mission Statement and Values. It may be argued that this is purely coincidental, however, Socrates’ speech in the Apology has been and still is a tremendous philosophical influence, thus, it appears more so that Socrates’ speech influenced the Connecticut College’s Mission Statement and Values. However, it is worth mentioning that the College’s Mission Statement was constructed for a unique purpose, thus, certain aspects of the College’s values are uniquely different from that of Socrates. Connecticut College wrote their…

    • 775 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates applies a rhetoric called elenchus that counters the popular Sophist rhetoric of the time. Elenchus introduces a method of debate based on utilizing questions and answers that inspire analytical thinking and tests the credibility of the opponent’s prior dialogue. In short, Socrates continuously “investigate[s] the question” (Line 348a). Socrates himself never explicitly states his opinion, but simply restates the declarations of the three interlocutors: Cephalus, Polymarchus, and Thrasymarchus. Socrates largely bases his arguments on his ability to accurately recall statements from earlier in the conversation.…

    • 554 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Argumentative Strategies of Plato vs. Aristophanes In Aristophanes’ “Clouds” and Plato’s “Apology” Socrates is satirically attacked and rationally defended respectively. The two argumentative styles of Aristophanes and Plato are on opposite sides of the spectrum. Aristophanes utilizes satire and humorous exaggerations of sophist teachings to denounce Socrates. Alternatively, Plato’s “Apology” uses logic and reason in order to defend himself against the charges brought against him.…

    • 2212 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The character that I decided to stand by during this dialog is Socrates. It seems like he was the most logical and provided the most facts out of all of the characters. Socrates is for the people before he his for himself. Even though I connected most with Socrates I do stand by Callicles in some of his points. Socrates is basically the goody tushu of all the characters.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates Rhetoric Analysis

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Socrates as one of the founders of Western philosophy opened a new chapter for the humankind. He considers rhetoric as a form of deception which only casually informs people for the sake of arguing for egotistical motives. He initially has started questioning almost everything around him and was looking for logical answers. So, as a person, who believed in the reasons he did not want to accept any position without a thought. Socrates believed that the art of rhetoric does not require lots of research and in-depth knowledge.…

    • 1685 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Striving For The Truth: An Academic Essay on Socrates Dialogue and How it Relates to Contemporary Education SITI SARAH BINTE NUR SAIDY BACHELOR SCIENCE OF EDUCATION AY14/15 AED 105-CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES OF EDUCATION TUTORIAL GROUP 12 TRAVINAH KAHNG Sarah Nur Saidy 1 Over the last millenium, education has been greatly influenced and developed through historical formation. From different eras, countries and cultures, it has come to an agreement that knowledge is vital in ones life. In this context, Socrates a renowned Greek Teacher and Western philosopher believed in developing ones…

    • 1271 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout most of the story, Plato proposes his argument through the use of hypothetical questions such as “And when he remembered his old habitation… do you not suppose that he would felicitate himself on the change, and pity them?” As he speaks to Glaucon, Socrates carries his words with a curious quality to it as if he does not know the truth himself. By constantly asking these questions to Glaucon, Socrates ignites a rather confused and thought provoking reaction. One can tell that Glaucon is so consumed in his own thoughts that he can barely voice more than a “certainly”, “yes”, or “very true” in response to Socrates. When listening to Socrates’ words, Plato hopes that the reader comes to his conclusions that there is a limit to truth and people only believe in what they choose to.…

    • 1108 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Contradiction of Socrates Plato illustrates Socrates in two different aspects in The Apology and in The Crito, which makes the reader ponder which interpretation of Socrates is substantial and which is fictions. Precisely, Plato portrayed Socrates with many inconsistencies in The Apology the emphasis was on obeying the Gods in contrast in The Crito the emphasis was on obeying the laws of Athens. In Plato’s Apology initiates with Socrates’ defense to the Athenian court demonstrating his innocence of the charges brought against him. Socrates was accused of breaking various laws under the Athenian court, the most significant laws were corrupting the youth and believing and worshiping in different Gods that the rest of the citizens in…

    • 1240 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The dialogues are conversations between Socrates, Hermocrates, Timeaus, and Critias. Apparently in response to a prior talk by Socrates about ideal societies, Timeaus and Critias agree to entertain Socrates with a tale that is "not a fiction but a true story”. The story is about the conflict between the ancient Athenians and the Atlantians 9000 years before Plato's time. Knowledge of the distant past apparently forgotten to the Athenians of Plato's day, the story of Atlantis was conveyed to Solon by Egyptian priests. Solon passed the tale to Dropides, the great-grandfather of Critias.…

    • 644 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In spite of the fact that a large portion of the talks given in Symposium were in address shape - that is, not considering what others said- - Socrates' discourse was much similar to this philosophical discussion. In his scrutinizing Agathon and giving a discourse that was a blend of…

    • 1343 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Socrates: Let me pose a situation to you, Pentheus; imagine there are people in a cave. These people have been there since childhood, with their bodies shackled so that they can only see that which is right in front of them. They are unable to turn their heads, and know no world except that which is in front of them. Pentheus: I can imagine this, of course.…

    • 904 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays