Genetic Information Discrimination Case Study

Improved Essays
Tamara,
Prior to this unit I was not familiar with the legalities with genetic testing nor had I heard of any incidence within my organization. I agree with your discussion post, the manager likely was violating the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA). According to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), “Title II of the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 (GINA), which prohibits genetic information discrimination in employment, took effect on November 21, 2009.” The law prohibits employees from being fired, discriminated against, paid, promoted, or laid off due to their genetic information. The reason being is genetic testing information is not relevant to their current working conditions, and is viewed as discrimination when used against the employee. It is also illegal to harass an employee based off their genetic information, or any relative of theirs (Genetic Information Discrimination).
If the nurses feel this is the case to why they are
…show more content…
Founders Pavilion, Inc. (2014), the defendant required employees and new applicants to provide family medical history, refused to accommodate an individual with disability resulting in early termination, and refused to hire and terminated women because they were pregnant. Further the organization failed to post the federal law requirements about equal opportunity employment. Founders was found to have violated the equal opportunity laws including GINA, and had to pay substantial monetary pay outs to those affected by the discrimination, have continuous monitoring and training with the EEOC, and adopt policies regarding equal opportunity laws (EEOC v. Founders Pavilion Inc.). Your discussion brought to light the serious implications of not obeying GINA, and the rights employees have if they feel they have discriminated against, wrongfully terminated, or harassed due to their own or a relative’s genetic

Related Documents

  • Great Essays

    Harassment and discrimination was evident in this case based on Maalick’s religion. Trenton has strong culture that provide avenues for employees to know what will and will not be accepted in relation to their behavior, workplace discrimination, and harassment. With that said, the company and employees should have been cautious to not violating Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Prior to accepting the new position and moving to Kansas, Maalick found and joined…

    • 1289 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The first amendment is the nucleus and appears to be the root of various political affairs in today’s modern society. From freedom of speech to the controversial subject matter of abortion; the first amendment contains multifarious deficiencies and is a profoundly disputed topic. Discrimination is one of the monumental aspects associated with this misconstrued amendment. Debate is very prevalent on the matter of whether it or not it should it be deemed unlawful for citizens to discriminate against minorities or gays without facing a consequence. The United States constitution prohibits discrimination when referring to any and all facets of employment. This includes the possibility of hiring, firing and every other form of employment. However,…

    • 1001 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    In an article titled “A Defense of Genetic Discrimination” published in 2013, Noah Levin attempts to defend genetic discrimination and uses the hypothetical example of a bus driver who is asymptomatic, meaning they show no symptoms, but “has a 90 percent chance of suffering a serious epileptic seizure within the next four years” (Genetic discrimination in employment). He argues that prohibiting an employer from having access to this genetic information creates a public safety risk. “Not only should use of genetic information be allowed in this case, it should be required” (In this case however, Levin fails to consider the chance that the tests are not completely accurate and even if they are, there is still a chance that this person will never have a seizure. Denying someone a job, promotion, or insurance based on the chance that they might develop a medical problem is unethical and…

    • 1404 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mellon Corp. is a case which also involved a wrongful termination claim on the grounds of pregnancy discrimination. The Bank of N.Y. Mellon Corp. (defendant) dismissed the complaint of pregnancy discrimination on the basis that the plaintiff was unable to make a “prima facie” case that she was discriminated against on the ground that she was pregnant. The defendant argued that had the plaintiff been able to establish a prima facie of discrimination, the bank provided a justifiable reason for the plaintiff’s termination. The defendant reasoned they had terminated five other non-pregnant women and two men, as well as the plaintiff, during a department-wide reorganization plan. In conclusion, the Court determined that the defendant presented reasonable, non-discriminatory reasons for the termination of the plaintiff (Carbonara v Bank of N.Y. Mellon Corp.,…

    • 1360 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Kathleen Bosko

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages

    This court should find that Kathleen Bosko presented nondiscriminatory reasons that were pretext for intentional discrimination. Pretext can be proven by showing that the reasons proffered by the defendant did not actually motivate the defendant’s challenged conduct. Latowski v. Northwoods Nursing Ctr., 549 Fed. Appx. 478, 486 (6th Cir. 2013)(unpublished); Gover v. Speedway Super Am., LLC, 284 F. Supp. 2d 858, 864 (S.D. Ohio 2003). Conversely, the circumstances tend to prove that an illegal motivation is more likely. Latowski, 549 Fed. Appx. 478, 485-6; Gover, 284 F. Supp. 2d 858, 864. In pregnancy discrimination cases, the burden on the plaintiff can be satisfied if it can be shown that discriminatory remarks were made directly to the plaintiff,…

    • 1633 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As stated above this case was brought to the United States District Court, Northern Division because the Plaintiff, Cindy A. Pilon, a Caucasian female applied for the Coordinator of Campus Recreation position at Saginaw Valley State University and was denied the position. The person who was rewarded the job was an African-American male. The plaintiff alleged reverse discrimination on January 7, 2003 and sued the university as well as the dean of the university, Richard P. Thompson. On march 10, 2003, the plaintiff amended her complaint, which now claims denial of equal protection of laws and discrimination on account of race in forming contracts; race discrimination against SVSU; and declaratory and injunctive relief against both defendants.…

    • 270 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    As modern medicine advances, genetic testing has become more advanced and accurate than ever before. By a relatively inexpensive test and within a few weeks time, an individual can know what diseases they are prone to in the future. While this technology is insightful, the information that it supplies has the potential to drastically change people 's lives. When taking a Utilitarian approach, Katharine Moser’s decision to undergo genetic testing is not viewed as morally wrong, but her decision to testify in court was.…

    • 835 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Race and ethnicity has little effect of genetic makeup, but it has a great effect on the level of care that an individual receives. There are many studies indicating that minority groups receive more expensive and lower quality health care. Some studies take a look at whether the site of care affects the quality of care among minority groups and how different lifestyle factors could also influence health. Using race in the health care system creates unnecessary discrimination. This discrimination leads to adverse health effects for minority populations. The change in care could be a result of the doctor-patient relationship differing when treating minority groups.…

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Eeo Vs Aa

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages

    The historical efforts of the mandates in Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) and Affirmative Action (AA) have made great strides. Their efforts have changed the manner in which many organizations recruit and promote. Moreover, the EEO and AA are the tools used in many organizations that increase opportunities for both females and minorities in their employee pool (Leonard, 1983). However, there may be instances where the programs used to promote equal treatment within the populace discriminates by its use. Interestingly enough, the United States Supreme Court (USSC) ruled in McDonald v. Santa Fe Trail Transportation that Title VII2 prohibits racial discrimination by both unions and employers against a white employee as well as non-white…

    • 1416 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act of 2008 “is a federal law that protects individuals from genetic discrimination in health insurance and employment. Genetic discrimination is the misuse of genetic information.” (GINA, Date) This includes health history, any results from genetic tests, participation in genetic research and even other genetic services. Genetic information is important being that it helps individuals understand any health conditions or any health risks that they are at risk for…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On June 1st 2015 the Supreme Court issued a decision that could affect the hiring policies and procedures of many employers. The 8-1 decision reversed the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit’s prior decision that under Title VII an employer is not required to provide a religious accommodation unless the employer had actual knowledge. The Supreme Court case was brought by the EEOC on behalf of Samantha Eluaf who was not hired by Abercrombie and Fitch (A&F) because her religious garb violated the company’s dress policy. Specifically, she wore a head scarf which was problematic because A&F’s dress policy prohibited head wear. The primary issue in the case was whether the company could be liable if it did not have actual knowledge of the need for accommodation. A&F argued that it did not know that the individual needed an accommodation. However, the Court held that under Title VII it did not matter if the company had knowledge of the religious status of the individual so long as the motive for not hiring the individual was based in any way on the individuals religion. The Court concluded that A&E’s motive for not hiring Samantha was to maintain its dress code.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Discrimination has always been a part of America’s history. Throughout time, an individual’s status in society was based on race and gender. The influence of this mindset left women and minorities feeling degraded when seeking employment and traces of this effect can still be seen in the working world today.…

    • 1270 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Wrongful Life

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Reproductive Genetics, Wrongful Life, and Wrongful Birth: A Summary Analysis of “Bill S-201: An Act to Prohibit and Prevent Genetic Discrimination” by Jennifer Ann Rinaldi…

    • 718 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ethics have a major impact in the way companies hire and fire employees. Today, more than ever, companies are susceptible to lawsuits for a myriad of reasons from wrongful termination to policy violation to violating equal employment rights. Many of these organizations spend years entangled in the legal system and accumulate thousands of dollars in legal fees. More often than not, many are bankrupt as a result while others downsize and pay out millions to victims. According to the 2016 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission’s (EEOC) report, there are more than 88,000 discrimination cases filed for the fiscal year 2014. There are extensive arguments to be made on both sides when employers such as Borgata Casino refusing employment to…

    • 1313 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Clearly determining functions an individual is able to perform is necessary to avoid discrimination. Employers must remain in compliance with Title VII of Civil Rights Act of 1964 at all times. Tolerance must be obtained from both parties to invite a happy medium within the work place. Within reason employers need to remain in tuned and vigilant of employees religious practices and beliefs. Again compromises can be made to alleviate discrimination. The unfortunate cases between Wal-Mart and Mr. Moorman for his age and the harassment he fact in the workplace is a tragedy. Lastly, Burns v. Coke is also unfair, an employee is clearly hurt from an on-the-job incident and Coke does not appear to be sympathetic to this injury is unacceptable. The laws and acts are set in place and rightfully so to fully protect the employees and ensure rights are not…

    • 923 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays