Gandhi's View On Civil Disobedience

Decent Essays
Mohandas Gandhi was the first person to use the civil disobedience, against the british for salt. He protest against them without violent and gain independe. We encourage people to use nonviolent as a great weapon against injustice. Government are making law that is not right and people should stand against it because it is wrong, and people should demands for better law from government. Government are making illegal laws more illegal. They are making laws more illegal because they don’t want people to go against them. It is not people's fault that they are going against the government, it is government fault that they are making the law that is no right, it is a unjust law. It said in the article “organization can face a fine of up to one million dollars for supporting a protester at a fracking facility, chemical plant, or other space.” this is too much one million dollars fine for protesting. And also said in the article “just for setting foot on private property jumps to a felony hit complete with one hundred thousand fine.” everyone can see that we this law are …show more content…
They make the law that make difference between people base on their color of their skin. Many black people don’t have right to vote, and they can be seated where ever they want. They had their own rule make by government. If not follow that then you you be jailed and pay fine for not following them. Martin luther king was arrested for protesting to government about the black right. And rosa parks who was arrested for sitting in a bus where she wasn't allow. She refuse to follow that unjust law and stand against it. Slowly more people are are realizing what government are doing and people are going against them. People are standing walls against the government and they will not stop until they get what they want, jail them, make them pay, but they will not obey the unjust law as long there is life in their

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    DBQ How would you feel if you weren’t allowed to eat at certain restaurants ,or even drink out of certain water fountains? You wouldn't feel like you had freedom would you? All three men fought against unjust laws to get the civil rights they also all fought peacefully they did not use any violence and fought for their right n boycott marches . All three men also accepted jail time without any hesitation because they knew they were fighting for their freedom. Breaking laws allowed nonviolence to work.…

    • 426 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    First, people need to protest and fight against inequalities. All governments should allow for equal rights and people should rally together and show their feelings against discrimination, as long as the protests are kept nonviolent. Nonviolent protests can show how a collection of people is powerful, because many nonviolent protests bring about change or awareness of an issue. Gandhi observed, “Nonviolence is an intensely active force when properly understood and used.” In 1930, Gandhi walked 240 miles with many supporters after Britain commanded no Indian could collect or sell salt in the country.…

    • 853 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    So many people have practiced civil disobedience; too many to count. Martin Luther King, Jr., Henry David Thoreau, Rosa Parks, Malala Yousafzai, Harriet Tubman, and many others all took a stand in what they thought was right, even though they could have been killed for their actions. In Martin Luther King Jr., “Letter From Birmingham City Jail”, he tells that somebody has to accept the consequence of their actions. Along with Martin Luther King Jr., Henry David Thoreau in “ Civil Disobedience,” he took the punishment for what he went up against because of what he thought was morally right. But what is so amazing about this, is they were selfless through it all; they did it so others could be helped.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In today’s modern society, peacefully resisting to unjust laws is almost an everyday thing. All around the globe today, we see prime examples of nation’s citizens peacefully demonstrating their opinions and believes to their ruling governments. That being said, civil disobedience and peacefully resisting to laws positively impact a free society. By peacefully resisting, societies come together to achieve a common goal, which is to fight back against their ruling governments due to unjust and unfair laws that negatively impact the governed.…

    • 534 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In history, civil disobedience has always played a big role when opposing corrupted power; by either changing a system or overthrowing a monarchy. Throughout time, many man and woman have stepped out of the social norms and with it creating the opportunity for a change of future generations. Individuals such as Martin Luther King, civil right activist who fought against segregation, are people that create a change in our society. As he once said “ We must learn to live together as brothers or perish together as fools.” , people like him are the ones that fight to obtain peace and eradicate unnecessary wars.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    According to Thoreau, when a government is wrong, and you as a man do not agree, it is your duty to verbalize your position, and react peacefully along with taking the consequences for your actions. He writes, “All men recognize the right of revolution; that is, the right to refuse allegiance to and to resist the government, when its tyranny or its inefficiency are great and unendurable” (Thoreau 53). Thoreau’s approach has been adopted by many individuals throughout history and his ideas have transcended centuries. Mahatma Gandhi, the renowned symbol of the Indian independence movement, is a good example of an individual who has adopted Thoreaus’ idea of civil disobedience. Ghandi expressed his distain of British Imperialism by holding nonviolent protests.…

    • 964 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Instead of utilizing violence against aggressors, Gandhi and King chose to retaliate against unjust laws nonviolently. These social reformers achieved this by nonviolent methods such as satyagraha and civil disobedience. After the British’s demeaning laws and taxes, Gandhi led multiple movements with the use of satyagraha to abolish them. Similarly, King organized a complete boycott of buses to promote his cause until the government had changed their ways. Although having subtle differences, these two methods provided their causes significant strength without the use of weapons or brutality.…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. himself even wrote “Letter From Birmingham Jail” that urged the readers to disobey laws that oppressed them, as they should not be put into place at all. This caught the attention of the public, which started to follow his advice and further the movement of the civil rights movement. There are hundreds of examples of civil disobedience that have worked out in the favor of the oppressed, including the nine civil rights protestors that broke the law by eating at the ‘whites only’ lunch counter and refused to pay bail, taking up space in the state jail; this caused the start of a nationwide “jail not bail” movement, organizing the fight for equal rights. In addition, the Salt March in 1930’s India combat the oppressive taxation laws made by the British government gained major media attention and support from others; this helped them gain independence and just treatment. Although other forms of fighting oppression, such as protesting or violence, can be effective at certain times, no other method has so many righteous outcomes as the practice of civil disobedience.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Throughout history, civil disobedience has helped societies grow and accept social reforms. The case of Martin Luther King, Jr.’s Letter from Birmingham Jail, is an important formal written statement for the need of social change. Civil disobedience has been a useful leveraging tactic in ways to draw attention to the perceived injustice. The injustice can be defined by the mistreatment of laws on people. In other words, unjust laws.…

    • 540 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Gandhi, who was said to believe profusely in non violent civil Disobediance claimed that "Non-Cooporation with evil is as much a duty as Cooporation with good. " One should make not that Non Cooporation is in no one intended to be taken as a hostile act against police officers,jail guards,or anyone else. An understood basis of non violent disobedianceis that the protest draws power from open confrontation and non-Cooporation I.e civil…

    • 551 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    "On Civil Disobedience," was written by Mohandas Gandhi on July 27, 1916. In his essay, Gandhi speaks of two ways of countering injustice. One way of dealing with injustice is violence, he states that even though you may win, you have not countered injustice but rather made it stronger and brings more disaster. He uses an analogy to show how violent protest lead to wars and winning wars, with this action, only brings about the decline of the nation rather than its progression. He states that only "strong" people in the world use this course of action.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, in India a large group peacefully lead by Gandhi marched over 240 miles to protest the British imposed salt laws, and on April 5th, 1930 the Salt laws were broken. Additionally, governments can easily justify violent retaliations against armed protesters, therefore when non-violent disobedience occurs government violence against nonviolent movements is likely to backfire against the government. After Gandhi’s Salt Satyagraha (or march), he along with thousands of others were jailed. Instead of suppressing the movement, it brought the beginning of India’s movement for absolute independence. This shows that non-violent resistance can bring a government to its knees, without using…

    • 414 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The United States of America, also known as “the land of the free and the home of the brave” has emphasized that the land is for freedom and equality. Many citizens through history have emphasized that laws or rules are unnecessary or should not be in place due to less freedom. Peaceful resistance is the best and most constructive way to express your view by opposing a law one considers unjust and peacefully disobeying it while accepting the consequences. The Bill of Rights protects citizens and allows them to peacefully resist. Peaceful resistance to laws and non-laws positively impacts a free society because it allows people to use their rights to express how they feel towards certain issues and create change.…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    "If a law is unjust, a man is not only right to disobey it, he is obligated to do so,” said by Thomas Jefferson. According to dictionary.com civil disobedience is, “the refusal to obey certain laws or governmental demands for the purpose of influencing legislation or government policy, characterized by the employment of such nonviolent techniques as boycotting,picketing, and nonpayment of taxes.” So, basically it means that a citizen refuses to follow laws that they don’t believe in or that they think are unjust. According to the Great Debaters they say, “An unjust law is no law at all.” This is true because if it goes against your morals you shouldn’t have to follow it, you should be able to peacefully protest the law, and finally an unjust…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    When Election Day comes around, everyone that is registered to vote does so because they feel as though they should have a say in who is in charge of the country they live in. The question is, is voting a right as a human being or a right as a citizen? Do people do it because they believe by voting they can pick the person they like for themselves or is it an act as a citizen to pick the better person who would make the country a better place? Would people still vote if they knew the two candidates were equally bad for the country? Would they still feel obligated to vote as a citizen?…

    • 1400 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays