Rhetorical Analysis On Thomas Paine

Superior Essays
In his piece, Thomas Paine strongly expresses a persuasive outlook as to why the colonists should fight for their independence. He believes that their willing right to be free shall not be put aside and that their abilities to achieve their freedom may be affected by factors such as God, the British, or even just simply the fact that Paine described the reasoning to get the colonists to fight in such an expressive way. Throughout this piece, Paine’s goal was to persuade the colonists to strive for liberty. To support his argument, Paine utilizes religious beliefs, descriptive language, and the recognition of the counter argument. To begin with, the author points to religious beliefs to demonstrate the relation God has on the colonists …show more content…
He shares that “Tyranny, like hell, is not easily conquered; yet we have this consolation with us, that the harder the conflict, the more glorious the triumph” (Paine 44). Thomas wanted to explain how the prize is much bigger than the fight. Although the fight may be dangerous, deadly, or difficult, the reward they will get will be more satisfying and have a greater effect in the end. He persuaded them by trying to get them to see further in the future and past the hard times. Paine had used imagery, trying to describe the win they will reward if they fight. He attempted to have the colonists imagine the situation and see how much more they’d get out of it after the struggles and obstacles. Paine also states “Not all the treasures of the world...could have induced me to support an offensive war...what signifies it to me, whether he who does it is a king...an individual villain...an army of them...we shall find no difference, why we should punish in the one case and pardon in the other” (Paine 46). He used descriptive words such as offensive, threaten, villain, punish, etc. to add more strength to his points and with descriptive words, it helps persuade the colonists to fight and do what they need to do to achieve freedom. These words help his persuasion because the colonists see words such as war and connect it to villain or army, and realize there is no bad …show more content…
He exemplifies in the text “I will not now enter into as an argument; my own simple opinion is, that had it been eight months earlier, it would have been much better. We did not make a proper use of last winter..” (Paine 44). The colonists were to blame for not acting for a very long time. They had waisted too much time sitting down and not solving anything. They didn’t win anything during their time of isolation and independence. Due to their lack of wins throughout this time period, Thomas had persuaded the colonists to fight to gain back their losses. He recognized the other side, Britain, by pointing out how the colonists let the British overthrow their power to get up and do something during the winter. They sat there and watched the British take control, but as he recognizes that, he also shows the colonists why they can’t let that happen again. They can’t let Britain take control. He also shares everyone experiences fear and panic, even when the British had became frightened from the French’s fleet. This fear has driven these men to become petrified and put their bravery on reserve (Paine 45). The fear that immensely spread, had gone through not only the British, but rather the English Army. War caused these soldiers great fear and Thomas persuaded the colonists to fight because he showed how all nations were frightened by war. They didn’t continue their bravery, they became scared. His

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    One could tell that Paine was not fond of the government because he felt as if they were not doing anything to do things better in some way the government was making things worse. The age of hereditary monarchy and aristocracy was over. People were citizens and not subjects, and were born with equal natural rights; that the people created, written constitutions that defined and limited their governments; that these written…

    • 1116 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    : Thomas Paine must have seen unjust rule when he lived in England and now because he was in America, and there were a few massacres and battles against Britain, he became motivated to write “Common Sense”. The Audience. : Thomas Paine’s audience primarily was comprised of patriots, colonists, angry colonists, political figures, and monarchs.…

    • 671 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He wanted all to know that the King was not fully dedicated towards the welfare of the Americans, he just wanted land and power. Thomas wrote in the benefit of the colonists, but the petition was written for independence under Britain. These two documents were caught in attention by colonists, and…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Paine says that reconciliation would bring “The ruin of the Continent.” This does not mean that Pain wants America and Britain to forever be at war, but he is saying that in order to bring overall peace, America needs to be its own nation in order to thrive on its own and prevent further fighting. This will prevent emigrants from going to their colony of bad governing and constant fighting. One of his reasons is that the British has a monarchy rule with an unfair kind, and America wants to be a democracy. Paine does not think that the king has the right to tell everyone that “[They] shall make no laws but what [he pleases]” He then states that with all of the fighting and tension, it would be nearly impossible to move forward and the two colonies would eventually just…

    • 567 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Paine says that Britain should be ashamed with how they dealt with the situation. I believe that he took this approach because he knew that it would be a very sensitive topic with the colonists who he was trying to convince to break away from Great Britain. He knew that many of them had come to the colonies for the very reason that he was bringing up and he knew that if anything would convince them to break away from Britain it would be that. Paine said “ … government even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one.” He felt that governments were bad and not necessary unless the lives of people would be made better with a…

    • 488 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    While loyalists argue that America has flourished under Great Britain, he refutes this by making a comparison to a growing a child and its mother. Paine argues “We may as well assert that because a child has thrived upon milk, that it is never to have meat” essentially saying we can’t be babies and depend on Britain forever, it’s time for America to grow up. Another of his justifications was that Britain was not a caring protector like many people thought, but really an exploitive empire using the colonies to her interest. Paine was right of course, Americans were confusing economic and political interest with attachment at the time.…

    • 1150 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For Paine to claim “there is nothing to render them wretched, there is nothing to engender riots and tumults” is unimaginable in today’s society due to recent happenings. Lately, all we see is tumults, people fighting people. Recently, riots broke out in Charlottesville due to a disagreement of whether or not to take down a confederate statue. The protests were supposed to be amicable, but in America today it seems like nothing can be peacefully resolved. If Paine had seen the riots that had went on in Charlottesville, he himself would disagree with his own claim.…

    • 639 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas meaning that the people who fight when the battle is easy to win, shouldn’t be noticed in hard times like this. If we ever doubt something, we’ll be the ones to be defeated and regret our decision of doubt, or in this case, quitting. His words inspired us to not quit just because of our state, and to try harder. Now this is a very important question to ask because what if we win the war? Maybe we’ll beat the British in this war.…

    • 907 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    1.What were Thomas Paine’s views on government? How did his writing convince colonists to fight for independence? Thomas Paine’s views on government, as he said in his pamphlet “Common Sense”, was that all people had the right to have a choice in government and all decisions that came from it. He called for the formation of a republic, where power came from the people and not from a corrupt monarch. Paine’s writing convinced colonists to fight for independence because it pointed out all the wrongdoings of Britain.…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Paine puts the theoretical attack in Biblical terms, arguing that the monarchy originated in sin. Paine presents his specific problems with the British monarchy with his attack on hereditary succession, and also lists his many grievances with the present king. Another common piece of Paine's argument is that America will eventually be independent. Sometimes he states this as a fact, and other times he seems to be persuading the reader, detailing the extent of the rift separating the colonies and the English king. Since many people were unsure about the idea of a revolution that would sever them from the king, establishing the principle of American independence was an integral part of Paine’s arguments.…

    • 1328 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Thomas Paine was an emigrant from England who wrote a persuasive pamphlet in 1776, known as Common Sense. this was a political argument for American Independence, written to the colonists in hopes to get them on board with separation from Great Britain. Samuel Seabury was “a native of Connecticut” who wrote a series of pamphlets arguing against Independence, in 1775, to the colonists, to prove why they needed to stay joined with Great Britain. While some may think the two authors, Thomas Paine and Samuel Seabury, wrote similarly in their documents as they both agreed there was a good amount of problems between Great Britain and the colonies, they had many different opinions, including: opinions on separation, the outcome of separation and the…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    It only took a month after his speech that the Revolutionary War officially began. Paine’s speech, on the contrary, was a motivation booster to recruit more people into the army to fight in the war; there were already a large number of soldiers in the fight. Henry did the much harder task of persuading the government to sent a country, millions of people, into a war that may fail and cause sizable number of…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Furthermore, since Paine printed this poem in July 1775, it indicates that the colonists were already on the brink of actually starting a revolution against England. The existing conflicts with the rulers was one of the last pushes that increased their need for separating from England to have control of their own land and lives. This eventually led the English colonists to start the American Revolution only a year later to gain independence from England. The actions that the colonists took before the Revolution signified that they were already on the road to being victorious in gaining their…

    • 1026 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Paine Starts by calling out tories and questioning them by asking “Why is it that the enemy have left the New England provinces, and made these middle ones the seat of war?” he then answers that question by saying “New england is not infested with tories, we are” This provokes and angers the colonists by telling them that the biggest obstacle they are facing are there own people who are in the british army. This question is answered with such passion by paine that the tories that were reading this would fear what paine is saying as he tells everyone that they are cowards and severely criticizes them, in order to persuade them that what they are doing is wrong and they should support the fight for freedom. He is able to create an example for the colonists to act toward tories and any tories that heard of this could be frightened out of loyalty to britain because they would be abused if they were to obey the rules of great britain. He also asks “If a thief breaks into my house... and to ‘bind me to all cases whatsoever to his absolute will, am I to suffer it?”…

    • 1145 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the pamphlet, Paine uses moral reference to God, and refers to God as a way to inspire and convince plainly to the colonists the importance of American Revolutionary war against the king and Great Britain. Paine used rational examples to oppose traditional government, specifically the authority of the British government, and tried to convince the colonists the king’s tyrannical actions. He speaks openly about having “little superstition” yet uses God as a reference to connect to the people, and emphasizes how “God Almighty” would not leave the Colonists unsupported from the British “military destruction” (W. W Norton & Company Inc. 648). By contrasting the King as a “murder”, Paine reminds the Colonists the tyrannical, unrighteous actions the King has imposed on the people such as the unfair right to “bind us [America] in all cases whatsoever” as an act similar to that of “slavery” (W. W Norton & Company Inc. 648). Moreover, Paine use of God and religion is more of way to influence the Colonists opinions than act as a sermon to purpose God as shaming or demeaning the cause of the Revolution.…

    • 1086 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays