Cognitive Theory Of Interpersonal Communication

Superior Essays
Essay on Interpersonal Communication Theories

It is known that communication is part of the everyday life of an individual; while we are speaking with our families at home, friends at school, colleagues at work or simply by talking to a stranger, we always use words and messages to communicate with one another. It is however seldom that people will be mindful of what manner of communication they are using in their daily lives. In this paper, definition of interpersonal communication will be initially discussed, followed by the several interpersonal communication theories that we may possible adapt.
Interpersonal Communication Interpersonal Communication (IPC) has various meanings as defined by several scholars. According to Miller (1978),
…show more content…
It is considered as one of the popular theory in Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology. Based on the name of the theory itself, cognitive refers to the mind and dissonance means inconsistency or conflict, which basically means that the theory talks about the mind or thinking being inconsistent or in conflict. To define clearly, cognitive dissonance is the psychological conflict from holding two or more incompatible beliefs simultaneously. This cognitive theory views individuals as more of a purposeful decision makers as they strive to balance their beliefs or perceptions. As what the theory suggests, when an individual is presented with information that creates conflict from what they initially believe in, they will use dissonance-reduction strategies to regain balance, especially if this will affect their self-esteem. They may either be uncomfortable enough with the conflict to be motivated to achieve consonance or they may avoid information and situation that might increase the …show more content…
Attribution Theory refers to the individual analyzing why people do what they do by piecing information together until they reach to a reasonable cause, which may be attributed to their characteristic or to the given situation that they are in. Cognitive Dissonance Theory refers to the tension or conflict being experienced by the mind when the individual was presented two or more ideas simultaneously which may possibly lead to alteration of behavior or perception. Lastly, Social Exchange Theory suggests that individuals weigh the rewards and punishment or the give and take ratio of the relationship to decide whether they would want to maintain or abandon the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    The process of both is under motion through the neural system. The mind has consecutive approaches that justify how individuals regard others and make attributions for them. Cognitive dissonance is merely seen at a confusing level engaging an individual’s behavior conflicting with his beliefs. At certain points cognitive dissonance can be avoided; when an individual knows himself and depending on what situation he stands. There is a possibility that cognitive dissonance can be reduced at some points.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Secondly, the self idea developed in relation to how we imagine others perceive or judge us. Lastly, the self idea emerges through the self feeling or attitude one develops toward themselves. This is based on how we believe other perceive us. The concept of the “looking glass” can be used to show the role of conflict and the role of strain. If were so worried in the way we think people think of us, it can bring conflict into the ways we achieve our roles in life.…

    • 725 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    If people focus on the negative aspect of conflict, more than likely there will not be a solution. Conflict is evitable, but manageable. Disagreement and Conflict A disagreement is a difference in position or opinion. When people have a disagreement it typically stems from a difference in interests, values, needs and experiences.…

    • 1274 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The success of a relationship requires that each partner understands the individual differences of the other. The characteristics of one partner’s personality may cause conflict in a relationship so therefore, understanding these aspects will more likely lead to conflict resolution. Two variables that may relate to each other are commitment and anxiety. Many scientists have attempted to identify a link between anxiety and relationship commitment and the link remains unclear. It is important to find the effects of these variables because they may help partners approach and understand conflicts.…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Principal-agent (PA) scholars usually focus on the difficulty with getting agents to expend more effort, known as the moral hazard problem. Even though agents and principals may share a common goal, agents have personal incentives to increase their own self-interests. These incentives can lead to tension between the goals of the principal and the execution of the task by the agents (Miller 2005). Agents may prefer to shirk and consequently the principal will suffer. PA scholars may argue that implementation varies because of the amount of effort agents expend.…

    • 1946 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    However, this approach centers around events causing people to think a certain way, whereas reality therapy is more concerned with internal reasons (based on needs) influencing people’s thinking. The premise behind REBT is that people experience events that influence their thoughts, causing them to feel a certain way, and in turn, behave accordingly. When people practice faulty thinking, they become upset, resulting in nonproductive actions (Gladding, 2016). Therefore, the idea is that through the group process, people can learn…

    • 1151 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On the S/N scale, which indicates the type of data I prefer states that I focus on facts and usually individuals with this trait tend to be pragmatic, concrete and inductive. By containing a strong voice, which can vary in different situations can draw a misinterpretation of my personality. This can become an issue with a team or organization and endanger my wellbeing within a…

    • 1590 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Tversky & Kahneman found that framing impacted the way participants made decisions. When participants were presented with a sure loss they made risk taking decisions, while being presented with a sure gain made them risk aversive. This is important to understand because framing can be used to manipulate a situation in a way that is not beneficial for the consumer of information. It is also important to this study, because the same types of positive and negative framing were used in the scenarios created. While framing can manipulate a decision, there is a set of strategies the people use in order to make decisions when there is a lack of information given about the…

    • 1833 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Self Persuasiness

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages

    In any case, if the people are conquered by selfishness, at that point the people will initially distinguish whether there is a contention between surrendering to self-interest (that ends in selfish conduct) and endeavors to seek after higher and more prominent reason (that ends in prosocial conduct). On the off chance that the contention is recognized, at that point the people will apply self-control. In applying strategies of self-control whether the people will fail or succeed it determines them to offer contributions to beggars or…

    • 867 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    26) explains the origination of barriers as follows: "Your ability to think critically, like the formation of opinions, attitudes, values and goals, is influenced by your social environment and the collective actions of shaping agents that define it. Some configurations promote you to develop your critical thinking skills - while other arrangements thwart your ability to become a critical thinker." Simply stated, we aren’t born with the impediments that foil our critical thinking skills, as they are learned, instead! (They’re not biological they’re sociological - brought on by our social environment). Moreover, these negative influences are broken down into two types of barriers, which include internal and external sources.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays