Analysis Of Euthyphro's Dilemma

Improved Essays
Within this paper, I will defend a side of the Euthyphro’s Dilemma. A classic question that is directed towards religious people and beliefs, that asks where is the source of morality? Is something moral because God commands it or does God commands something moral because it is good? I believe what is morally good is for a fact of God commands it to be so; anything may be considered moral, but we as humans don’t have the power to decide whether something is moral or not. Thus giving sovereignty and acknowledgement of his divine command which is the foundation of morality. The standard of morality can’t be external, nor does God appeal to a higher authority. God is the omnipotent higher being and it is his nature to be good, creator and the …show more content…
In the Holy Bible, God explicitly describes everything he creates in the world in reflection of himself in the book of Genesis. “And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light.”(Genesis 1:3 ESV) “And God saw that it was good.” His creations are divine, he commanded something and it came into existence. He has commanded that there will be light, lands, seas, vegetation, and the living creatures, and identifies that his creations are good, therefore all good things form through him. Furthermore, “God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him…And God saw everything that he had made, and behold, it was very good.”(Genesis 1:27-31 ESV) This proves God, has dominion over what he created in heaven and on earth. Clarifying that he creates goodness and commands it into existence when he creates it. For that reason God is the source and creator of morality and we as humans are not capable to command what is …show more content…
For that reason, he may command something that is morally right and then later may become morally wrong. However without superior authority, no one will follow or worship his divinity. Thus leaving morality in the minds of man to determine what is moral because we declare it to be. In John 3:14 states, “In the beginning was the word, and the word was with God, and the word was God.” Affirming that morality doesn’t precede God, because he is the foundation of morality which was created through him and by him. Hence the commandments are repeated exactly and are a reflection of his morally good nature, he cannot change what he commands to be moral. Linking morality as an essential part of his nature, he is unchanging. God commanded all these things to exist that became to be, which were all recognized as being good. That being the case, God is commanding something moral because it is to what his character embodies. He has created earth and heaven in his image alike, both reflect his moral nature that will remain

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    One is to ground goodness in God’s nature. This answers the question of whether an action is morally good because God commands it because it implies that God does not decide what is right and what is wrong on impulse. It is God’s nature to do good, and God never acts against his nature. God commands and speaks out of his character, not arbitrarily. This then answers the question of whether God commands an action because it is morally good because the foundation of morality is God’s nature and not some external principle to which God must follow.…

    • 1302 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    If something is good because it is the will of God, then God is Good because this is his will. However, this is an empty tautology. We cannot recognise what it means to praise God for his goodness. It would suggest nothing other than God willing whatever he wants to. Adams objects to this, arguing that a statement such as 'God is Good ' should be understood metaphysically rather than morally.…

    • 1485 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    He argues that because God is morally perfect he would never command any immoral or unjust actions (Koons). This would make all acts willed by God morally good and acts that are morally good willed by God because of their moral goodness. One worry for Alston’s argument is that is brings about the question “what does God’s essential goodness consist of?” A supporter of the Divine Command theory may reply that the essential goodness consists in His distinctive assets that represent who He is. Traits that He embodies are being loving and kindness but using these two traits creates an opportunity for a revised Euthyphro dilemma to be written. Are the properties of being loving and kind good because they are assets that God exemplifies, or is God good because he exemplifies those traits?…

    • 807 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    In the Euthyphro dilemma, Socrates poses the question, does God approve of things because they are moral or are things moral because God approves of them? The former suggests that God merely reinforces what is already intrinsically moral and that his commands are inessential to determining the nature of morality. This option does not explain the roots of morality and also presents limitations on God’s sovereignty, but the latter option also presents substantial problems as well. God, in the latter option, is inevitably the decider of what qualifies as moral in society. God’s commands, therefore, created morality and there is no moral code outside of his approval.…

    • 2204 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    William L. Craig also agrees that a person can be morally good without the belief in God, however, he states that the debate is about the goodness without God. He argued that Kurtz showed the absence of God in order to show that nihilism is not true. But in Craig’s statement he argued for theism, which is when moral values are bounded by God. He made a statement that if theism were to be true, then we have a sound foundation for morality, and if it is not true, we do not have a sound foundation for morality. Craig started off with theism was true.…

    • 747 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Without an absolute standard, morality would be relative and dependent on each individual. But morality is not a human invention; it flows from the nature of God, who is eternal and unchanging. Therefore, as much as we may want to, we cannot determine what is right and wrong on our own. Our Creator, the Source of all truth, has revealed what we need to know of right and wrong in His Word. (…

    • 1071 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Value Of Grace

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Those who ‘receive’ Christ do so only because they are given power by God to do so (John 1:12). What the believer has, of grace and faith, he has because he has received it from God and not for any other reason (1 Corinthians 4:8). In considering the grace of God we must always perceive of the unalloyed nature of God’s grace. If we say that we have done anything of ourselves, if we say that we are good and deserving people or that we can make a free-will decision to be so, we have contaminated the grace of God by making its introduction into our lives at least partially dependent upon something of and from ourselves. In contaminating it we do not merely add impurities to it we utterly sacrifice…

    • 700 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    First, it addresses the problem that is usually faced in ethics because it gets rid of the personal emotions in ethics and makes it objective. There is no subjectivity in it because whatever God allows is good and whatever He doesn’t want us to do is bad. Also, because God is going to judge us at the end of our lives, it is important to still live morally well and not just worry about only you. In other words, any actions that negatively affect other humans will be attributed to you and you may not be looked highly upon by God (Rachels p.…

    • 1238 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Great Essays

    Rachels proposes this quote as an objection to DCT, “do the gods command it because it is right?” (51). This quote portrays that God is deducing something to be morally right based on something else, apart from himself. A sophisticated euthyphist would say that because God recognizes something to be right and it is no longer up to him to command actions. The source that God deduced the command from is what determines the action to be morally right or wrong—not God. Philosophical educator Crash Course, stresses that if the rules of morality are taken from something other than God, then why can others not just find that source and figure out morality for themselves (Crash Course).…

    • 1259 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    On this option, the reason we should be truthful is simply that God requires it. Apart from the divine command, truth telling is neither good nor bad. It is God’s command that makes truthfulness right”(Rachels. 51), which means that truthfulness only became right after God commanded it but it was neither right nor wrong before he commanded it. What is right and what is wrong does not have to be understood under the terms of God’s will.…

    • 1252 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays