Pros And Cons Of Cultural Relativism

Improved Essays
Ethnocentrism refers to judging other cultures based on our own cultural standards. The culture which a person belongs to is centered. Other cultures rotate towards it with a sense of inferiority.Xenocentrism and culture relativism both lay at the extremities of ethnocentrism. What could an excess of each cause? Are we limited to any international standard? Is any culture prone to extinction due to any of those concepts? Are we rendering our own cultures isolated and drifting towards belonging to different culture that is more brourjois and well set in place?

Why do we feel awfully affiliated with other cultures? Why are we lured into their divergent multi-potent, outrageous customs and traditions? Is it that we find in them what is lacking
…show more content…
In fact, society needs moral standards as it needs language. Actually, no moral system is better than another, just as there is no possible method to know which of many languages is better. But, also, within any given language there are grammatical and spelling rules. This is why we can say that morality is the social, grammatical, and spelling rules that permit a group of people to get along with each other within the same group. However, this leads to another drawback of cultural relativism. In fact, asserting something is right doesn’t make it right. What a society believes about morals might be at odds with what is really true, and those who set the moral code may be mistaken. Many societies may accept the mistreatment of women .For instance, in 2007, a woman in Saudi Arabia complained to the police due to the fact that she was gang-raped. Nevertheless, in the course of their investigation, the police discovered that she had been living with a man to whom she was not related .They accused her of committing a crime and sentenced her 90 lashes. When she appealed her conviction, the judges got mad at her, and they increased her sentence to 200 lashes and a six-month prison term. Eventually, although the Saudi king pardoned her, he affirmed that he supported the punishment she had received. Thus we can deduce that societies commit and support injustices and discriminations, and many of them must be in need of moral improvement. This makes us rethink what cultural Relativism states, and that is that societies are morally infallible, meaning that the morals of a culture are always

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    He notes how any society will have certain standards ingrained within its members and that these ingrained morals cannot simply just be forced aside when confronted with a separate society with differing morals. (Williams, 21) Rachels’ relativism argument and Williams’ counter argument are examples of philosophies without a universal moral truth and an argument that debases it. The case of Rachels’ relativism is a little strange in that, while the theory claims to be spreading tolerance of other cultures, the lack of a universal standard to base the moral judgements upon brings up the question of how one would judge their own moral standards. This is especially potent in cases where a culture permits acts such as conquest and genocide-acts that obviously will bring harm to others. The Nazi regime is a prime example of this.…

    • 1298 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Four Types Of Relativism

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Relativism is multifaceted. Cultural Relativism is related to the morals followed and created because of the culture in which one is raised in. Descriptive Ethical Relativism is almost just like Cultural Relativism, but it has to do with things that are tolerated in one country that would not be tolerated in a different country. Lastly, Normative Relativism just ties in the fact that there is no quote on quote, right or wrong due to cultural and societal differences. Works Cited O’Sullivan, Stephen and Philip A. Pecorino.…

    • 596 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Cultural relativism says all one has to do is check if their action is in agreement with their societal code to determine if their action is right or wrong. But what if their societal codes are wrong? “Cultural Relativism not only forbids us from criticizing the codes of other societies; it also stops us from criticizing our own” (Rachels 34). Rachels final argument against cultural relativism is that it destroys the idea of moral progress and social change. We could not say that Martin Luther King, Jr. changed society for the better as that would be judging the social standards of another time.…

    • 412 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Human Rights Are Universal

    • 1903 Words
    • 8 Pages

    This does question as to which rights should be universalised. I can also see that rights are flawed. Even if rights are made universal, people have the freedom to deny them and act according to how they wish; how can you impose rights (which are supposed to be for human benefit) on someone who does not wish to follow it? Rights are flawed because it it dependent on humans- if they are not respected then it 's meaning and point of existence is lost. For example, terrorist groups in a country with universal rights, can either deny why they need rights when they don’t follow the system; or they can use these rights for their own gain.…

    • 1903 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    If the moral views differ, what would be the right thing to do? Cultural relativist fail to offer a consistent answer. Secondly, cultural relativism forces us to conformity. Since just majority groups are right, minority groups are wrong. Where are we leaving our individual reason and critical thinking to improve ourselves?…

    • 1318 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    Therefore, moral truth is relative and varies from culture to culture. Further on, he justifies why the cultural relativism argument is invalid, and why cultural relativism (if it were true) is an unacceptable form of morality. Finally, he makes concessions to acknowledge some valuable learning points of cultural relativism. In this essay, I argue the flaws in his conclusions and maintains that although it is important for objective truths to exist, cultural relativism may still be a best explanation for some extreme cases of disagreements that we observe today. The Cultural Differences argument postulates that different cultures have different moral codes.…

    • 1886 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    They create a hierarchy of rights which eliminate the idea of equality between all rights. This creates a conflicts of rights where only few rights (Or in reality, only one…) can be considered incontrovertible. Authors have their own set of rights which they consider to be incontrovertible: Hobbes (security); Kant (freedom); Arendt (citizenship) and Locke (life, liberty & property). According to them, the rights mentioned in parentheses are superior to other rights and must be respected within conflicts. This may cause societal division as individuals have a multitude of perspectives as to what rights we should hold important in society.…

    • 1212 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Rachel points out in his argument three unfavorable consequences of cultural relativism. The first, states that we must not distinguish “customs of other societies as morally inferior to our own”. (471) Secondly, we can determine what is right or wrong by the standards of our society. Lastly, “moral progress is called into doubt”. Therefore, if progress means making things better by replacing old ways, then those social standards are able to change as well.…

    • 1504 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Benedict and Midgley The thesis of Benedict’s is that moral relativism is the correct view of the morality. Benedict’s claim that every culture is different from one another. Morality differs from every culture, that’s why what is moral to one culture can be immoral to another. Which culture is right is which one is wrong? it is part of the culture points of view, because if every culture has different standards or right and wrong then we cannot say which one is the one with the total truth.…

    • 1277 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    What is Cultural appropriation? Cultural appropriation: is a sociological concept which views the adoption or use of elements of one culture by members of a different culture as a largely negative phenomenon. It has become normalized in media to take specific components from different cultures and weave it into “trends” while downplaying the significance of those same components to their cultures. While cultural appropriation seems harmless to those who do it, it is demoralizing to those societies, people need to be aware of the ignorance that they are demonstrating by picking and choosing what they consider to be the “cool” aspects of a culture. Cultural appropriation is a topic that is currently highly debated and criticized.…

    • 1366 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays