When researching one particular solution to a problem, it is difficult to be entirely objective in relation to the other possible solutions. In particular, this is an ethical problem when applying for funding to make a living. In the context of fusion research, the historical perspective leads to an additional complication: it is difficult to give up after investing half a century trying to solve a problem. In order to not fall for, or at least be aware of these incentives to communicate dishonestly, it is important to reflect upon your role as a researcher.
As argued by Pielke~\cite{pielke}, all the four roles of a scientist are valuable.
As a {utilitarianist}, I believe that all good deeds can be derived from the increased happiness they ultimately lead to, but due to the complexity of such consequence analysis, it is practical to have some simple rules to follow in everyday life: {deontological …show more content…
Accordingly, if I was asked as a expert if we should cut all funding of fusion research, I should acknowledge my role as an Issue Advocate and then argue for continuing fusion research. On the other hand, if the question concerns how we should produce electricity in the future without contributing to climate change, I believe the most appropriate role is the Honest Broker since the optimal solution to this problem is uncertain, and I believe it is important to explore many options in order to minimize the risk that none of the solutions work well. In this case, I believe that I could be a genuinely honest Honest Broker by adding new perspectives depending on the needs of society, even if my advice would be negative towards
As argued by Pielke~\cite{pielke}, all the four roles of a scientist are valuable.
As a {utilitarianist}, I believe that all good deeds can be derived from the increased happiness they ultimately lead to, but due to the complexity of such consequence analysis, it is practical to have some simple rules to follow in everyday life: {deontological …show more content…
Accordingly, if I was asked as a expert if we should cut all funding of fusion research, I should acknowledge my role as an Issue Advocate and then argue for continuing fusion research. On the other hand, if the question concerns how we should produce electricity in the future without contributing to climate change, I believe the most appropriate role is the Honest Broker since the optimal solution to this problem is uncertain, and I believe it is important to explore many options in order to minimize the risk that none of the solutions work well. In this case, I believe that I could be a genuinely honest Honest Broker by adding new perspectives depending on the needs of society, even if my advice would be negative towards