Utilitarianism: The Case Of Happiness

Improved Essays
The Case of Happiness
It is no secret that we want to live a happy life. Utilitarianism is simple; it is based on the idea that our actions are morally wrong or right depending on the outcomes of those actions (Gilmore, Travis). Morally right actions increase happiness. Morally wrong actions decrease happiness. In this paper, I will show that the basic concept of Utilitarianism is a true justified ethical theory. First, I will explain why the Principle of Utility is beneficial in making decisions. Next, I will set out to explain how Utilitarianism accounts for our happiness. Then, I will discuss its capacity to remain impartial. Finally, I will examine the best objection to Utilitarianism. You make people happy when you help them, and you
…show more content…
Hypothetically there is a train, and it is going to hit a human, but if you derail it, you will kill a dog on the other side of the tracks. According to Utilitarianism what would need to be considered are the consequences. Mills would argue that the pain of losing a human life is greater than the pain of losing a beast 's life. While the cats death would still cause pain, it would cause as much net pain as the human. By the same token, a theory that takes into account the life of not only humans but the creatures on this planet and in our solar system is all encompassing and universal. Our intuitions lead us to believe that these creatures have feelings just like us. They are an extension of our …show more content…
It is the belief that all beings should be equal(Landauer and Rowlands). Equality is a right that has been fought for over the centuries. Even the Bible speaks of equality " There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus ( Galatians 3:28). People such as MLK have championed and suffered greatly in the name of equality. Entire movements have repeatedly been centered around equality. It is the reason women can vote, why we can go to school with people of different ethnicities, and why we can love who we want. Race, sex, religion; none of it matters. What would matter is that majority of the community would be happy. No one person or small group of people should hold all the power A society where all are equal is a society where there is no poverty, no injustice, no hate. Who wouldn 't want to live in a place where pain and injustice were nonexistent. If a person can accept that treating everyone fairly and everyone receiving the same rights is a good thing, then one must accept utilitarianism as justifiably true.
Me, Myself and

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Power and Politics President Bill Clinton, once said: “In our hearts and in our laws, we must treat all our people with fairness and dignity, regardless of their race, religion, gender or sexual orientation. ”(Stephanie Sarkis Ph.D). This defines that we should treat everyone around us equally and fairly even though equality isn’t always fair. In Anthem the scholars have the right to tell everyone what they will do with the rest of their life and when they will eat or when to go to sleep. I stand in my position believing that equality isn’t always fair because every society has different ranks, abilities are being limited, and ethnic groups getting treated differently.…

    • 978 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tellishment Argument

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What is the moral theory of utilitarianism? According to Vaughn, “[Utilitarianism is] the view that right actions are those that result in the greatest overall happiness for everyone involved” (Vaughn, 79). At face value such a moral theory sounds great, because it should promote general happiness. While this is true, a particular argument, the telishment argument, shows that utilitarianism is not a viable moral theory because it promotes decisions that run contrary to historical moral inclinations. To prove this is the case, this paper will first dive into what happiness means in the utilitarian sense, the telishment argument itself, what points of contention the tellishment argument brings up against utilitarianism, and finally, what utilitarianism has to say in its own defense.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    4. How might utilitarianism be used to resolve dilemma 4 (pg. 132 of Jones)? Do you agree with this resolution? Why or why not?…

    • 1308 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Utilitarianism is a normative philosophy of ethics that has been around since the late eighteenth century. It earliest proponents were Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. The general idea of utilitarianism is that there is no morality measurement except results. So, when one is deciding how to act, the only thing that matters is what the results of the actions are. Utilitarianism says that the actions that cause the most happiness and the least amount of unhappiness or pain are the moral acts.…

    • 1678 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Have you ever wanted everyone to be perfectly equal? How much freedom would you be willing to give away to achieve this? What is true equality?Can equality ever be achieved theoretically? Could near perfect equality be achieved in real life, without going to extremes? The short story, Harrison Bergeron, helps explore some of these questions in extremes ways.…

    • 649 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In a utilitarian mind you should always seek for happiness no matter what the cost is. I think that we aren’t build as humans just to be too conceded to only think about ourselves. In a scenario if you were given 20 billion dollars and to live alone with a dog or to continue living your normal life, the Utilitarian answer would be to take the 20 billion dollars because it would make you happy. As a human we basically cannot be happy without the relations we have built in life and having your love ones around you. Even though we are presented with absolute pleasure we still have our side of humanity where we think of the fact that sometimes we need to experience pain in order to be able to grow as a human being.…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is an approach to ethics that states that utility, also known as happiness, is inherently desirable. It examines the consequences of actions rather than the act itself, and maintains…

    • 1232 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Act Vs Rule Utilitarianism

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The search for the greatest way to reduce suffering and increase happiness has been a search that has confused and inspired philosophers all the way down to Aristotle and beyond. Each proposed a system that supposedly if implemented would create a utopia like world. One such implementation is utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is an efficient way that if implemented would accomplish its goal. However, it is brutal, enable the act of racism, and does not take into account the feelings of minorities.…

    • 1034 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is Utilitarianism? Utilitarianism is a philosophical concept that holds an action to be held right if it tends to promote happiness for the greatest number of people. Utilitarian’s define the morally right actions as those actions that maximize happiness and minimize misery. Many believe that utilitarianism is an unrealistic theory. Arguments and responses to utilitarianism being too demanding have been made John Stuart Mill and Peter Singer.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is interesting because it takes primarily a consequentialist approach to ethic looking at the ends to something and looks at the pros or cons of an action, or what causes the most happiness versus the amount of generating pain from an action. Even though it sounds simple to compare the amount of happiness versus pain the equation that we have to use for utilitarianism does not always work the that it should and other flaws that we will go over in this essay taking an unusual stance on the matter, questioning the utility monster but also criticizes utilitarianism later but also saying that it is the best that we have currently have. The idea of a utility monster is not a valid objection against utilitarianism and can be worked…

    • 1459 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The doctrine focuses on the consequences of actions as they aim to increase the happiness of the whole. Peter Singer goes on to apply the utilitarian doctrine to assert that people have an obligation to alleviate distant human suffering. Overall, utilitarianism highlights the importance of putting the happiness of others before your own. One may argue that utilitarianism cannot be applied to society because humans are inherently self-interested. However, utilitarianism can still be applied if all people see each other as equals, and recognize that everyone’s happiness is equally…

    • 1033 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Let us begin by formally defining act utilitarianism: a theory of right action that defines the act to be “right if and only if, and because, its consequences contain at least as large a net balance of wellbeing minus ill-being as those of any alternative possible act in that situation” (Frick, Lecture 1 Slides). And thus, an act utilitarian, when making decisions regarding human life, looks solely at the net difference in wellbeing and ill-being. I would like to call attention to the impersonality — which I believe to be the strongest objection to act utilitarianism— that results from this process of quantifying happiness, as it disregards perspectives of the individual as well as the intrinsic value of human life. Take, for example, the moral dilemma caused by the fat man in the trolley problem as presented by Thomson in “Killing, Letting Die, and the Trolley Problem.” The situation with the fat man is essentially as follows:…

    • 993 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Utilitarianism is one of the persuasive approaches to ethics in the history of philosophy. It is widely used by everyone on a daily basis but has barely gotten recognition it deserves. Utilitarianism was founded in Ancient Greece but was not popularly used until the 19th century when it was re-introduced by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. While both men are credited as two of the most influential people in the foundation of, what we now consider, ethical theory. The approach in which we utilize the theory to make decisions is different from each other.…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    According to utilitarianism, the welfare of each must count. If in our moral decisions we do not consider the interests of someone who has positive or negative experiences, then we are not considering the total of happiness. This means that discrimination against non-human sensitive animals, which have positive or negative experiences or preferences, is incompatible with a theory such as utilitarianism. This approach must consider every part of suffering and every part of happiness, which involves considering both the experiences of nonhuman animals and those of humans. For this reason, early utilitarian theorists, such as J. Bentham or J.S. Mill advocated moral consideration of nonhuman animals.…

    • 1352 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In ethics there are hundreds of theories that try to define morality. Utilitarianism is one of these theories that seems to simply be that if one is being moral, their decisions will create the greatest amount of happiness for everyone (Clark & Poortenga, 2003). This theory has been defended by many, including Jeremey Bentham, who popularized quantitative utilitarianism, and John Stuart Mill, who believed that utilitarianism was actually qualitative (Wilkens, 2011). While utilitarianism as a whole can seem clear-cut, John Stuart Mill’s theory of qualitative utilitarianism has many ethical problems, and is too simple to accurately address every moral decision. Utilitarianism is a fairly popular viewpoint when it comes to morality because it…

    • 1063 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays