Utilitarianism In Saving Private Ryan

Superior Essays
Utilitarianism is one of the persuasive approaches to ethics in the history of philosophy. It is widely used by everyone on a daily basis but has barely gotten recognition it deserves. Utilitarianism was founded in Ancient Greece but was not popularly used until the 19th century when it was re-introduced by Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill. While both men are credited as two of the most influential people in the foundation of, what we now consider, ethical theory. The approach in which we utilize the theory to make decisions is different from each other. In addition to discussing the two theorist’s views regarding utilitarianism, I will overview how the ethics of Utilitarianism was applied in the movie I am familiar with; Saving Private …show more content…
The premise of the movie is about a mother who is about to get three telegrams stating that three of her four sons have been killed in action in WWII. The U.S military feels great remorse for her loss and sends a team of men into the warzone to retrieve her last remaining son to return him home to his mother. In the film, there are two examples of Utilitarianism. The first relates to Bentham’s theory of greatest happiness. The seven-man squad is walking through the French countryside and walks upon a few dead American soldiers. They spot a radio bunker with German troops stationed there, so the squad members tell their captain that they can just sneak past the bunker and continue on with their mission. The captain replies no and that they need to take out the Germans at the bunker, because he doesn’t want any other American soldiers to be ambushed. At that moment Bentham’s theory of “primal” good was applied in that situation as that was definitely an action focused on getting the greatest amount of good for the greatest number of …show more content…
Bentham’s theory could not be applied in that case due to the fact that they were each willing to risk their own lives, so collectively risking all seven lives of the rescue squad, for the sake of one life. That exact instance would fall under Mill’s theory of pleasures. The men of the rescue team sent to save Private Ryan were making decisions to achieve their own personal higher pleasures. they were each driven to satisfy their own intellectual, spiritual, and emotional pleasures, even if each team member may have viewed happiness differently. All the squad members were each driven by their dedication to the Army, to one another, and to the

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In Said’s situation, there would be much more pain than pleasure because it is assumed that he bombs himself, and many others, on a public bus. We also must think about Said’s mother, siblings, friends, and Suha. They would experience significant pain from Said’s life being lost. Bentham says that a right action is only right if it produces the highest amount of utility over every other action. According to Bentham, Said’s actions are not morally justifiable because he is killing a bus full of innocent people.…

    • 460 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The Soldiers Family

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages

    So they would make a “trade”, 18 of our troops for 18 of your troops). There we people out there aimed with guns at the “troops” and our general said “If you don’t give us our troops back, then we’ll shoot your troops.” So we got our troops back. When they said that they had 18 of their troops they were really just scarecrows that looked like their troops. Our army ended up tricking them and getting our troops back without any harm, until they found…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Tellishment Argument

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What is the moral theory of utilitarianism? According to Vaughn, “[Utilitarianism is] the view that right actions are those that result in the greatest overall happiness for everyone involved” (Vaughn, 79). At face value such a moral theory sounds great, because it should promote general happiness. While this is true, a particular argument, the telishment argument, shows that utilitarianism is not a viable moral theory because it promotes decisions that run contrary to historical moral inclinations. To prove this is the case, this paper will first dive into what happiness means in the utilitarian sense, the telishment argument itself, what points of contention the tellishment argument brings up against utilitarianism, and finally, what utilitarianism has to say in its own defense.…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    4. How might utilitarianism be used to resolve dilemma 4 (pg. 132 of Jones)? Do you agree with this resolution? Why or why not?…

    • 1308 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Growing up, we have all experienced the pressures of utility. According to Jeremy Benthem, utility is defined as, “the property in any object, whereby it tends to produce benefits, advantage, pleasure, good or happiness, to prevent the happening of mischief, pain, evil, or unhappiness to the party whose interests is considered.” Today in more modern terms, we could call it people pleasing. It is from this principle where we get utilitarianism, a property that is characterized by the principle of utility and can be defined by the elements happiness and consequentialism. In which Bentham believes, the measure of good and evil is balanced between ones individual happiness and the happiness of the community around them.…

    • 626 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    What is Utilitarianism? Utilitarianism is a philosophical concept that holds an action to be held right if it tends to promote happiness for the greatest number of people. Utilitarian’s define the morally right actions as those actions that maximize happiness and minimize misery. Many believe that utilitarianism is an unrealistic theory. Arguments and responses to utilitarianism being too demanding have been made John Stuart Mill and Peter Singer.…

    • 783 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is considered as one of the most prominent philosophical concepts. This model's core perspective emphasizes that actions are ethically acceptable or unacceptable depending on their consequences. Based on this understanding, it can be argued that utilitarians hold that the goal of morality is to improve life by enhancing some favorable things such as happiness in the world while minimizing undesirable aspects such as grief (Urmson, 33). Consequently, the core objective of this essay is to define and critique both Act and Rule Utilitarianism, as well as determine the most practical kind of utilitarianism.…

    • 870 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Final Exam 1. In “A Critique of Utilitarianism”, Bernard Williams argues against the fundamental characteristics of utilitarianism and believes that the notion of ends justifying the means are a way of representing the doctrine of negative responsibility which can lead to consequences from the choices we make/do not make (663). As a result, we are all responsible for the consequences that we fail to prevent as well as the ones we brought upon ourselves. That is, in each case the choice on whether an action is right is determined by its consequences (661). Williams gives the example of killing one villager to save 19 others (664) in which he critiques the different principles of utilitarianism and integrity - the moral righteousness that is…

    • 1213 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Utilitarianism is an ethical theory based on the greatest good for the greatest number of people. The moral philosopher Bentham wanted decisions to be made that would result in the most pleasure. It is also based on the final outcome, so for something to be considered right or wrong, it is determined by the consequences. This theory does not…

    • 1285 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Good and bad are absolute, there can be no middle ground when it comes to doing what is right. This is what people have been debating since the beginning of time. Unfortunately this methodology is flawed and outdated. Ethics is this large gray area, with no definite right decision that everyone can follow. Their are so many different philosophies and theories on what is the ethical right and wrong, that is hard for an average person to make a decision that will not be question or debated.…

    • 1006 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Ethics is a branch of philosophy that, at its core, seeks to understand and to determine how human actions can be judged as right or wrong. There are multiple variations and subclasses of ethical theories. These theories that help us with decision making can be challenged or critiqued. In particular Mill’s Utilitarianism, an ethical theory that promoted the greatest happiness for the greatest number, was criticized by Charles Taylor in his article The Diversity of Goods. The article written by Charles Taylor argues a utilitarian and consequentialist conception of morality leaves out essential aspects of human experience that are integral to our moral lives.…

    • 1852 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Jeremy Bentham and John Stuart Mill are considered founders of Utilitarianism. Utilitarianism is an ethical theory where moral rightness is measured by what brings the most happiness to the most people. Utilitarianism is a form of consequentialism because it is based on whether an action is morally justified by its consequences. Bentham and Mill differ in that Bentham reasoned that pleasure was measurable using hedons, units of pleasure, where actions with the highest score were the best action.…

    • 728 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism focuses on the consequences of an action. Endowing to the classical utilitarian moral theory, we classify human acts or practices as we consider neither the nature of the acts or practices nor the motive for which people do what they do. This can harvest to one’s action; that a life conceivably is saved, which matters morally. There is no total distinction between what is right and what is wrong based on Bentham’s view, only if the consequences are the highest favorable for the person’s greatest happiness, even including the majority of the people related to this person who is responsible to give that action. Drawing a conclusion about utilitarianism, it is our duty to decide which action or practice is best by considering the likely or actual consequences of each substitute.…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Utilitarianism dates all the way back to the 19th century and is famously associated with philosophers Jeremey Bentham…

    • 1216 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Utilitarianism is an “act as to maximize or further pleasure for everyone.” Jeremy Bentham, a philosopher and creator of the Hedonic Calculus argues that there are only two masters when it comes to maximizing happiness, pleasure v.s. pain. However, according to his calculus whoever is receiving more pleasure than pain, by all means should continue the act, even if it is immoral. For example, if a sadist is torturing an innocent person and is receiving more pleasure than the innocent person is receiving pain then, according to Bentham it is okay for the sadist to continue because that would mean maximum happiness has been achieved. And the sole goal of Utilitarianism is to maximize pleasure for everyone.…

    • 899 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays