Ethical Decision-Making The Doctrine Of Sin And Grace Analysis

Improved Essays
Introduction In “Ethical Decision-Making: The Doctrine of Sin and Grace,” Giles attempts to examine the subject of ethical decision-making based on the bounds of freedom of the will. According to Giles, the reformed view and the wider Christian tradition supports that the will is inhibited by the result of humanity’s sin. The author examines freedom or the lack of freedom in regards to the will of man. Although I agree with the flow and result of the summary of research in this article, this critique will examine this article with respect to the weaknesses of the author’s analysis.
Brief Summary This author’s intent was to argue that under certain conditions, fallen humanity, whether degenerate or regenerate, has a freedom in regards to ethical decision-making. In this, Giles attempted to
…show more content…
He did not write about the theological differences on the effects of the fall from a reformed verses Roman Catholic traditions. Rather, he focused on the differences of opinions among the reformed theological tradition. The author heavily explains that Calvin’s terminology in his writings was problematic due to the intended audience being within the fold of his following. Because those writing ventured out to people opposed to his view, they sounded much more pessimistic than what he normally would have presented to an outside audience. Giles goes on to explain the nature and reach of free will. He starts by giving his opinion. He explains that man freely changed the original relationship he had with God, but graceful and sinful relations both have a restraint on our freedom. In another words, free will is a misnomer. Then, the author gives the views of the various reformed perspectives on the bonded will of man. Finally, Giles closes out the paper with a summary of free and bonded wills. He brings back the Roman tradition’s perspective and compares it once again to he reformed tradition’s

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    Since the inception of humanity, the ongoing argument has reigned of whether man is basically evil or good. Accompanying this argument is the question: Does humanity have free will to act upon the universe as we please or are we fate’s puppet to do as fate deems worthy? In Loung Ung’s, First They Killed My Father and William Shakespeare’s Macbeth, both question and argument are laid to rest as both authors open the window to the human soul with the cruelty of humans and the differing opinions of good and evil. As philosopher Thomas Hobbes said, “Moral philosophy is nothing else but the science of what is good, and evil, in the conversation, and society of humanity.…

    • 139 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    C.S. Lewis’s, Mere Christianity, combined ethics and religion in an attempt to find the meaning of the universe. By focusing on the aspect of right and wrong, I was able to combine a bulk of this module’s assignments into one paper, allowing me a more comprehensive picture. Compare the thinking of the development of ethical thought through the ages: The teams built their ACU PEPs on guidelines which had already been established to build a comprehensive standard of our own for mediators. The study and development of ethics over the ages followed the same process, building upon or reacting to already established philosophies and thoughts.…

    • 1039 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In this essay we will discuss free will, the Principle of Alternative Possibilities and Harry Frankfurt’s argument against it. The idea behind the Principle of Alternative Possibilities is that, “An action is free in the sense required for moral responsibility only if the agent could have done otherwise than she actually did” (McKenna, Pereboom). This means that in order to hold a person morally responsible, he must have had another option to choose from. This idea has become a key rule when talking about free will.…

    • 879 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is Strawson Wrong

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In this paper, I am going to argue that Galen Strawson is wrong when he claims that we cannot be ultimately morally responsible for our actions. The basis of Strawson’s argument conveys that nothing can be the cause of itself and for one to be responsible for one’s actions then, they have to be the cause of themselves. In other words, what Strawson is saying is that you act because of the way you are. So, he says to be morally responsible for one’s action then, one must be responsible for their character, personality and motivational structure (CPM), but since you cannot be responsible for your CPM, then you are not morally responsible for your actions. To put it short, he says that if the person is not responsible for his/her being, so how…

    • 1137 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Why Is Strawson Wrong

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages

    In this paper, I am going to argue that Galen Strawson is wrong when he claims that we cannot be ultimately morally responsible for our actions. The basis of Strawson’s Basic Argument is that you act because of the way you are. So, he says that in order to be morally responsible for one’s actions, one must be responsible for their character, personality and motivational structure (CPM), but since you cannot be responsible for your CPM, then you are not morally responsible for your actions. Moral responsibility is the praise or blame a person deserves for their actions. According to Strawson, only if the person chose to be that way, then they are morally responsible for their actions.…

    • 1118 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Week Two Written Responses Ethics: Approaching Moral Decisions According to Holmes the source of human rights is the scriptures in the Bible. There are many scriptures that show these human rights, and God also displays them by the way He treats everyone in the same manner throughout the Bible. As Christians we were born with human rights and Holmes explains this by stating, "Endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights" (Holmes, 1984, p. 89).…

    • 1300 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The ethical principles in Christianity guide adherents to follow and do ‘what is good’ and reject the imitation of ‘what is evil’ as the teachings are heavily influenced by Christ’s commandment to love as God loves. The ethical principles which consist of the 10 commandments and the beatitudes provide towards the adherents the opportunity to provide an agape love that reflects that of Christ himself. This agape love demonstrates and paves the path for Christian adherents to model. In relation to the issues of abortion, euthanasia and stem cells, Christian adherents are often challenged to do “what is good” as within each of these important issues, there lies the presence of a direct threat to life given by God. There are however within the…

    • 1025 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Introduction There are different types of moral theories that have been presented by various philosophers to justify or rebuke certain actions or decisions. These theories include utilitarianism theory, the Confucianism theory as well as the social obligation theory. Most often, the question of morality presents various ethical complexities that result in disagreements on whether an action or decision is morally right or wrong. This is because the nature of morality is that there lacks an objective truth of what is morally right or wrong. In presenting my argument, I am cognizant of the fact that there are no unanimously established moral rules or values in society.…

    • 1028 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Individuals hold distinct values and often conclude their interpretation of the world is true and right. It is this complex fusion of values and beliefs that lead to ethical dilemmas. Newman and Pollnitz (2005, page 108) describe ethics as what we perceive to be the right course of action, what we…

    • 1986 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    One of the key figures in church history is John Calvin. John Calvin is someone who radically changed the early Christian Church. Similar to Luther, Calvin was someone who drove the Reformation forward. Calvin however had slightly different beliefs from Luther, especially when it came to the sacraments. This paper will explore who John Calvin was, how he differed from Luther, and what his main teachings were.…

    • 1393 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Explanations

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages

    a person’s standards of behavior or beliefs concerning what is and is not acceptable for them to do. This essay intends point out the relevant aspects of moral theologians, Kant, Mill, Aristotle and Held and to answer the question of the best suited approach in resolving ethical problems and dilemmas. Kant I have found that Kant’s theory is the most complicated and confusing of the four. It was only made somewhat clear by the explanation in O’Neill’s reading.…

    • 2003 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    The following paper argues in favor of Aristotle’s virtue ethics over Kantian deontology. In Kantian deontology, to be ethical is to follow one’s duty by acting on only the rules which one can at the same time rationally will that those actions become universal laws, while in Aristotelian virtue ethics, to be ethical is to develop and internalize virtuous habits until one fully becomes virtuous themselves. In turn, the ethical question of ‘What should I do?’ that deontology asks becomes ‘What should I be?’ with virtue ethics, placing emphasis on internal motivations rather than external actions.…

    • 1915 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Superior Essays

    For many years there has been a debate between the opposing philosophical frameworks consequentialism and deontology. Some could argue that consequentialisms maxim of "the ends justify the means” as the determinant for a moral action may be inconsistent with other important aspects of value such as rights and allegiance. Others may argue that deontology is simply too restrictive and independent of the context in which it could be applied to. Although these two philosophical frameworks have various pros and cons associated with them, I will argue that consequentialism is the most flexible of the two frameworks. Consequentialism portrays right action in terms of intrinsic value, stating that the “action is right if…its consequences would be…

    • 1347 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Consequentialism and deontology are contrasting theories of philosophy that guide us in viewing acts in terms of their morality. The doctrine of consequentialism suggests we should judge the morality of actions purely on the results they produce; whereas deontology aims to judge morality based on the conduct of an individual, and morality is decided from the moral acceptance of a particular action rather than the result the decision produces. These principles of philosophy have existed for thousands of years, with many philosophers throughout history using them as a basis for their work. In the context of an ethical situation, we can thoroughly use these ideologies as instruments to determine an effective solution to prevent a harmful dilemma;…

    • 1326 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Frankfurt introduces a new argument to replace the principle of alternate possibilities, which is; a person is not morally responsible for what he has done if he did it only because he could not have done otherwise. If a person cannot do, otherwise it is important to try to comprehend the reasons that are leading them to this decision. While free will is, a question of science and which will never be proven, moral responsibility is based on social reasoning and the right answer can never be agreed upon but must be decided upon…

    • 1165 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays