Essay On Non Animal Testing

Improved Essays
The Truth Of Animal Experimentation
Animal experimentations consists of the careless and damaging testing of commercial and scientific products on all sort of animals, for differents purposes, such as: safety, benefits or toxicity for the human use. We are all aware of the existence of current regulations for this activity, but the actual data of the animals protected by the Animal Welfare Act (AWA), a law approved in 1966, is just the 5% . 1,134,693 animals were reported by AWA in 2010. However since the law excludes farm animals, birds, rats and mice, the real number is unknown. ”Estimates of the number of animals not counted by the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)
…show more content…
It was linked to heart attacks and strokes in up to 139,000 humans”.

3.- Benefits of non-animal testing.- Non-animal testing technology goes from computerized patients, models and simulations to the give of little quantities of a substance to humans that would only affect the cellular level. The results of this new testing seem to be more reliable, accurate,cost-effective, practical, expedient and specially cruelty free.
“The “Lethal Dose 50” (LD50) test forces animals to ingest toxic and lethal substances to the endpoint of where 50% of the animals in the study die—and those that do not are later killed. The late Dr. Bjӧrn Ekwall (Cytotoxicology Laboratory in Sweden) developed a replacement for the LD50 test that measured toxicity at a precision rate of up to 85% accuracy compared to the LD50 rate of 61-65%. This test, far more accurate than the animal models, uses donated human tissue rather than animal.” (Alternatives in Testing)
4.- Public Opinion Over the years, the support for animal testing has been decreasing. The lower support comes from the younger adults, while the high scores for acceptance are ran by the 65 year olds, and older ones. Women, who are more sensitive, are more likely to oppose animal experimentation, even twice than

Related Documents

  • Superior Essays

    This suffering has been deemed ethically permissible, provided that researchers express confidence in their ability to achieve predictable benefits to humans (Doke & Dhawale, 2015; Ferdowsian & Beck, 2011, p.2). Modern scientific knowledge paired with tragic historical instances of human drug toxicity has raised questions and concerns regarding the ethics of preclinical animal testing for both humans and animals. If humans are not benefitting from the suffering of animal testing models, then the permissibility parameters for their suffering are not being fulfilled. If preclinical animal data cannot be accurately translated to real-life human scenarios, then human trials are being conducted unethically, as risks may no longer be outweighed by benefits, and study participants do not consent to the possibility of unknown risks or the fact that the trial in which they are deciding to participate, has been designed based on inaccurate assumptions (Greek, Hansen & Pippus, 2012; Green,…

    • 1363 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    For example, “Animals do not get many of the human diseases that people do, such as major types of heart disease, many types of cancer, HIV, Parkinson’s disease, or schizophrenia. Instead, signs of these diseases are artificially induced in animals in laboratories in an attempt to mimic the human disease"(Cruelty-Free International Organisation). Experimenters are attempting to mirror human diseases by artificially creating symptoms in different species of animals, resulting in extremely inaccurate test results. Not only will it affect future test results, but it will also be dangerous for those who use the products. In addition, based on U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, nine out of ten experimental drugs are unsuccessful in clinical studies because experimenters cannot precisely predict how tests on animal species will perform in people, according to laboratory and animal studies.…

    • 844 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    On average, about 26 million animals are taken and used as little test subjects for big corporations to test their possibly harmful, and occasionally lethal, products before they release them to the public's use. This testing on animals began in 500 B.C and many corporations that participate in it see no harm, and have absolutely no intentions of stopping it anytime soon. There are many people that think testing these possibly dangerous products on innocent animals is not a big deal, but this paper will inform the public with some statistics and also give you the writer's perspective on why animal testing is wrong. One thing that is very arguable when talking about whether testing on these creatures should be approved, and continue or…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal testing is unsafe, due to the obvious differences between humans and animals. Therefore, results from animal testing can be inaccurate, or can yield results that differ between animals and humans. For example, a drug used in cosmetics called Fen Phen has no effect on animals, but causes heart damage to humans (“Animals in Science”). Since animal testing is an ineffective way of testing chemicals or drugs, it could potentially put many people at risk (“Animal Experimentation”). Nevertheless, humans are being harmed from dangerous and unreliable tests, while animals are dying without cause since these tests are unsuccessful.…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    The report was a response to the U.S Envirnnmental Protection Agency (EPA) who requested the NRC to re-inspect the animal-based testing methods. The report clearly states that “[a]dvances in toxicogenomics, bioinformatics, systems biology, epigenetics, and computational toxicology could transform a system based on whole-animal testing to one founded primarily on in vitro methods that evaluate changes in biologic processes using cells, cell lines, or cellular components, preferable of human origin.” Furthermore enforcing the belief that not only can alternative testing methods stop the ruthless killing of hundreds of thousands of animals every year, but advance the world of medical discovery and enhance research all over the…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Say Goodbye to Animal Experimentation “Over 100 million animals are burned, crippled, poisoned, and abused in US labs every year” (11 Facts). Testing on animals is scientifically known as vivisection and it is used for a number of reasons. Verifying the safety of products meant for human use is one of the reasons for animal experimentation. Products requiring animal testing are cosmetic, personal care, household, chemicals, and medical devices. Vivisection is also used to develop new medical treatments that may be beneficial to some patients.…

    • 1312 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In the past century, advances in technology and scientific discoveries have given rise to what is known to us as modern medicine. Although,we should appreciate the extensive knowledge that we have gained today. It is also very important to understand the methods/experiments that have led to these discoveries. This is very similar to ordering a dish at the restaurant without asking what ingredients were used in making it. Unfortunately, in light of these discoveries many animals are being used in research testing and toxicity testing.…

    • 905 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The test preformed on the animals may not have the same effect on humans. The best method to test for human toxicity would be to test on humans, which is immoral. Still, science has advanced due to the development of animal tests that are currently being…

    • 472 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Animal Testing Argument

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages

    John Ericson from Newsweek magazine, offers several facts and statistics on the treatment involved with animal testing. Ericson states, “Over 25 million animals [are] used for research annually.” However, ninety-two percent of the products that were tested on lab animals and were considered safe to the animals, fail in human testing, due to the lack of internal and external similarities between laboratory animal and humans (Ericson). This being the case, animal testing proves to be an ineffective way to determine toxicity on drugs and other products. Additionally, animal testing proves not only to be a waste of animals’ lives, but an insufficient waste of time and money.…

    • 834 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Great Essays

    Due to the unreliable nature of tests done on animals; people lose their lives when it reaches the phase of testing the products on humans (Doke and Dhawale). It is a common occurrence to have drug fails at that stage despite tremendous success when done on animals like mice. The assumption that the effects of drugs on animals and people are similar is one that researchers are unwilling to let go. This is despite the numerous disastrous outcomes that have been borne out of animal research. The practice is also a sign that the society is on a backward, instead of forward…

    • 1344 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    With all the testing that gets done to the animals, some of the tests fail and we can’t even use the products. Testing on animals could kill them during the tests. Testing on any species is dangerous, it’s like testing on a human, the results are uncertain. The amount of animals dying from the tests in a year is insane, “ONE…

    • 788 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Audience Analysis This paper targets students who have ill family member and animal lovers. Since I am exploring about the topic of animal testing that has been very controversial, my primary audience, UMD students, would be able to actively be a part of this topic to come up with their own opinion. Both my primary and secondary audiences must have their own background information and idea of why or why not people should conduct animal testing. To reach my audience, I can publish this online on UMD writing center or debate website.…

    • 1272 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Argumentative Essay On Animal Testing

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 2 Works Cited

    Now days, society can volunteer themselves in clinical drug research for a monetary exchange. With modern science “we can see inside peoples’ brains using imaging machines or test microscopic amounts of new drugs harmlessly on volunteers.” (BUAV.org the campaign to end animal experiments, pg 7) Humans are more willing to volunteer themselves for the money, but also because strict health and safety precautions are put in place for their well-being at all times during the study. Humans can also communicate their side effects and pain occurrence which provides sound and optimal results for future modifications and or dosages. Unfortunately, animals cannot communicate these important factors, which in turn is useless.…

    • 1075 Words
    • 5 Pages
    • 2 Works Cited
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    The dangers of using animals to test products being made for human uses is a high risk. Approximately 225 million animals are used for testing every year. Billions have been killed in the process. ("Questions and Answers About Biomedical Research.” )…

    • 2182 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Scientists and researchers that are found to be abusing these animals during experiments and research should face tougher punishments and heavier fines to prevent this negative perception of animal testing and research from increasing. Government bodies that are involved in animal testing and research should always adhere to the guidelines and laws about the right of the animals enforced by the local authorities. Local authorities play a huge role in the prevention of cruelty towards animals used for research and testing. By enforcing tougher rules and punishments, this negative perception towards animal testing and research can be decreased and the society can be more aware about the benefits of it and have a more positive outlook of animal testing and research. In addition to local and state laws and guidelines, animal research has been regulated by the federal Animal Welfare Act (AWA) since 1966 (ProCon).…

    • 1062 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays

Related Topics