WWII Was Justified

Better Essays
“Was the US justified in dropping the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in WWII.” Discuss the benefits and costs that resulted.

The horrendous outcomes of World War I (1914 – 1919) truly terrified the whole world. Yet, followed by the war that supposedly ended all wars, the second war began (1939 – 1945). Lasting six years, with more than 60 million casualties, 6 times as many compared to the casualties in WWI. The deaths and the natures of war raises discussions of how cruel and inhumane war is, but it was the atomic bomb used to end WWII that remained controversial over the years. However, despite how many people have disagreed with the use of the nuclear weapon, it was absolutely necessary to end it. The US was reasonable for making
…show more content…
On the other hand, many may argue about the damages that Japan had to endure, there were several other countries suffering because of the actions of the Japanese troops.

First of all, it is undoubtedly true that the use of “Little Boy” and “Fat Man was cruel, nonetheless, because of the use of the atomic bomb, many lives were saved. It is estimated that 199,000 civilians in Hiroshima and Nagasaki died as the result. Immediately looking at this number, people would assume that there was no way America would be given a justification. However, we need to consider the other plan that the American servicemen would be forced to undertake if the bombs were not used. The second choice was to make Japan surrender by actually invading the mainlands, which would have lengthened the the war and increased the death rate. Approximately, there would have been 1,200,000 casualties, according to Joint Chiefs of Staff in April, 1945. Even though soldiers are expected to fight and sacrifice themselves for the sake of their country, they too are humans, and their lives are not worth any less than the civilians. Additionally, 100, 000 Allied prisoners
…show more content…
Initially, the US was not part of the Allied, it was neutral. Also, even though tension was rising between between these two nations, they still remain at peace. With that terrifying ambition that Japan had, it sparked a war it would forever regret on American territory. Aerial attacks caused numerous bullets and bombs to rain onto 20 battleships, and 300 airplanes, destroying them. The fuel leakage from the ships continued to raise concerns over the environment, which over the time, would cause damage to the shoreline of Hawaii and interfere with the US naval function. This was a long term effect the US had no chance to have a say to prevent it from happening. The most alarming fact, however, was that 2403 soldiers were killed, with 1178 wounded. It was a completely one sided attack, without a warning. So, if we compare this to the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the US gave Japan many chances for them to surrender, and informed them about the outcome if they were to refuse. So, overall, for those who argued that Japanese endured many hardships due to the bombs, it did not justify their actions at Pearl Habour because that eventually led to the US to resort to the last method and this proved the bomb use was

Related Documents

  • Decent Essays

    The article states, “Had the invasion not been preempted by the dropping of the atom bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, almost all agree that the campaign would have stood as the bloodiest chapter of the Second World War, adding as much as an additional 10 million dead”. Soldiers were prepared to go into the mission, but if they had millions would be dead. Dropping the atomic bombs was a good decision to save millions of Japanese and American troops. The reason for dropping the bombs can because of the many American lives that were lost during the attack on Pearl Harbor. As a nation, America felt the right way to get back at Japan was to bomb them back but on a more massive scale.…

    • 798 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    What were the motives behind the United States decision to use atomic bombs against Japan and what arguments have been made against it? WWII was fought between the Allied powers composed of USA, Britain and the Soviet Union, and the Axis Powers, comprised of Germany, Italy and Japan, and was one of the deadliest conflicts in all of history. The vast amount of casualties on both sides totalled to 6,000,000 deaths – about 3% of the global population in the 1940s. The use of atomic bombs was to put an end to the war. Leading up to Hiroshima and Nagasaki, the Manhattan Project influenced the course of history.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Using the atomic bomb was rash decision to end the war before thinking of all the casualties. The United States decision to use the atomic bomb on Japan doesn 't seem to justify the ending of the war. The loss of civilian life and effect on citizens for decades after the bombing are one of main reasons why the united states should have altered their decision at the time. The United States claims to be a great super power and mitigator in times of distress however their decisions regarding the status of Japan prove…

    • 1012 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    That despite how much I want to believe that my country is without fault, that is far from the truth. It also shows me that sometimes difficult choices need to be made. Even though the atomic bomb did kill thousands of Japanese, it also saved thousands of American lives. This event shows me that war usually has no good outcome. Either way lives would be lost, which makes the choices even harder.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The atomic bomb was dropped on the Japanese city Hiroshima on August 6th, 1945. The bomb was created and dropped to defeat Japan and Defend the United States. There have been many debates on whether the bomb should have been dropped or not. The bomb should have been dropped because it saved many American lives, Japan had a warning to surrender, Japan did many bad things to the Chinese and the Americans and America has had enough. President Truman ordering for the atomic bomb to be dropped saved many American lives because if the bomb was not dropped, the war would have continued even longer giving Japan a longer time to continue invading the United States killing more and more Americans.…

    • 542 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The Holocaust, the Holodomor, and the Ottoman Greek genocide – all examples of infamous massacres throughout the history of the world. Each of these genocides were committed during times of war, and their lack of ethicality is rarely questioned; most come to the consensus that these massacres were inhumane and unjust. But there is one genocide in the world’s history whose ethicality is frequently debated – President Truman’s decision to drop the Atomic bomb on Japan during World War II; this decision led to the death of copious amounts of Japanese citizens, and although the decision is not irreproachable, ultimately it was the proper decision in order to end the war. The brutality and inhumanity the innocent Japanese citizens suffered through…

    • 1037 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Although the alternative of waiting for help from the Soviet Union would have been helpful, Truman believed that it wouldn’t necessarily put an end to the war. However, the decision to drop the atomic bomb was based on multiple crucial factors. One reason was that Truman was determined to end the war as soon as possible. Many American troops were being killed or injured and America needed some relief from war. Another reason was that the United States wanted to get revenge on Japan for the attacks that were made in Pearl Harbor.…

    • 1372 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    The war in the Pacific, including Iwo Jima was extremely bloody and cost many lives. A lot of things led to the bomb in Hiroshima including Manhattan project which was the making of the bomb and the bombing of the first bomb in Alamogordo. Many people suggested the atomic bomb with hopes of ending the war sooner and to save lives. However, many people also advised against using the bomb because it would kill thousands upon thousands. They also advised against it because of The Hague Convention and the Historic National Laws of war.…

    • 1254 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    According to an article about the pros and cons of dropping the atomic bombs, the government claimed that one reason for dropping the bombs was to instill fear into the Japanese people. The United States ' possession and usage of the bombs demonstrated their strength to not only the Japanese but also the rest of the world. A counterargument to the bombs is that great tension was created between Japan and the United States ("Pros and Cons of Dropping the Atomic Bomb"). The United States was able to scare the Japanese, thus forcing them to surrender. Although a strong tension was created between the two countries, it would not have been much different had the Americans invaded Japan and killed thousands of their people in that fashion.…

    • 2015 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Decent Essays

    “It would have been morally wrong if we’d have had that weapon (the atomic bomb) and not used it and let a million more people die.” stated Colonel Tibbets, the pilot of the Enola Gay. (Document L) The Enola Gay was the plane that dropped the first atomic weapon on Hiroshima. The Colonel was saying that if they had not dropped that bomb, it would have killed more of their men (the Americans), which would have been morally wrong because you are supposed to do what’s best for your team or army. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were definitely a Military Necessity because as stated earlier, a minimum of a million more people would have died if they did not follow through with the bombing. They needed to protect their own soldiers first.…

    • 1655 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Decent Essays