Civilization And Its Discontent By Immanuel Kant Analysis

Improved Essays
Being involved and residing in a community has many expectations individuals are supposed to follow and respect. The natural man is supposed to respect his neighbors, land, others land, and overall community. Living in a civilized community means countless opportunities, jobs, friends, ideas, and beliefs that are to be respected by all. People have a right to their own personal views and belies which may contradict another’s belief on the same topic, Immanuel Kant’s article, “What is Enlightenment”, and Sigmund Freud’s book, Civilization and Its Discontents, have contradicting views on human nature and society as a whole. Human life and being active in the world is constantly changing with various outlooks on the upcoming civilized society. …show more content…
Technology has impacted human life to thousands of ideas and beliefs to relate to and build off of to create unique opinions, that societies thousands of years ago could have never wrap their head around. Technology advances human communication in undesribleable ways, it provides countless of ways to voice an opinion about a worldly issue and rightfully so could bring praise and/or criticism. However, it can also lead to violence, wars, and strikes throughout communities that can then ruin an individual’s way of life. Individuals need to understand when using technology and posting their ideas, respect must be made to those who have different opinions that challenge the original. Individuals who respect others comments through technology, can bring peace to civilizations and in turn, violence and uproars through communities would simplify or hopefully diminish. For example, a big topic in today’s society is global warming, the individual may choose to believe that global warming is not impacting the world or does not exist and post about it with other people who have the same consensus. Contradicting them, another person or group could comment their opinion on how glaciers are melting and species that live in the tundra are becoming extinct because of society as a whole, contributing to various air pollutants which absorb the sunlight along with the greenhouse gases which, the effects, is the radiation is being caught and absorbed with the gases and pollutants that it is cause the world to become warmer as a whole because the pollutants cannot escape to space properly. This can cause a rivalry and debate between the groups with who is right and can cause strikes and marches in cities for their view on global warming. Since technology offers countless places to post ideas and opinions about a

Related Documents

  • Improved Essays

    In Fahrenheit 451 a fictional novel by Ray Bradbury and in the non-fiction article “The {Divisive, Corrosive, Democracy-Poisoning} Golden Age of Free Speech” by By Tufekci Zeynep, the question of whether various approaches to free speech can promote or harm the interests of a society, given technological considerations. By drawing conclusions from both written pieces, the result is that when considering technology, free speech can harm the interests of society. In general, individuals in a society wish to get along with one another as well as possible. However, with the help of social media and other technological advances its is easier than ever to fight with other individuals and to believe that one is correct. People fight on social media and claim that they are allowed to say anything because of ‘free speech’.…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    In "How Tech Created a Global Village,” Nicholas Carr conveys the current use and the intended use of the internet. Carr states “We live in a fractious time, defined not by concord but by conflict,” Nicholas Carr. This is an interesting quote and one that really captures the essence of this article. He stated this earlier in the article and lead into it explaining how Mark Zuckerberg was a pioneer in the internet realm by creating the social media giant known as Facebook. Nearly 2 billion people are on Facebook and that creates a lot of room for conversation.…

    • 523 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    In Chapter 5 Sandel introduces us to the philosopher Immanuel Kant. This chapter talks focuses on Kant’s view on motive such as: What is the Supreme principle of morality and what is human freedom? Kant believes that morality is based on universal law. Kant calls this act categorical imperative. The idea is that you should treat everyone how everyone would want to be treated.…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Since the earliest writings on political thought, political society’s effects on an individual 's life has been discussed. Political theorists differ in their ideas of individuals positions in society; theorist Hobbes believes that the rights of individuals are subservient to the rights of a monarch, as a opposed to the more democratic writings of Locke which focus on individual rights. Regardless, the idea of why societies have been formed has been discussed frequently. In later writings, a new trend is seen in that there is more of a focus on how the formation of society affects individual happiness or quality of life. Both Karl Marx (in “Estranged Labor”) and Sigmund Freud (in “Civilization and Its Discontents”) address the position of individual…

    • 2108 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Great Essays

    The greatest human triumph is human society itself. We are granted with expansive intellect, which we use to continually improve our condition. We are given profound compassion by which we can relay our feelings and experiences to those around us. Humans have a dire need to be accepted, which drives the fortification of community. However, people strengthen their communities until they have a resolute identity, creating an intrinsic exclusiveness within social groups.…

    • 1305 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Although technology has greatly increased our ability to communicate and to communicate freely, it has also, as Cass Sunstein points out, "greatly increased people’s ability to “filter” what they want to read, see, and hear. " In other words, technology has facilitated our wishes to view opinions that we find favorable. Naturally aiming to find happiness through pleasure, we are not as compelled to seek out materials the challenge, frustrate, or upset us. In the harm principle, Mill assumes that we regularly interact with offensive opinions, people, and actions. He is right to assume this for the time during which he was writing wherein communication was less controlled as most of it was done face-to-face or by newspaper, for example.…

    • 487 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    2) a,b : This passage is taken from "What is Enlightenment", by Immanuel Kant, from the first page of the essay. Kant is criticizing the over dependence of a grown up individual for nurturing and caretaking and possibly resisting the responsibilities brought to him. He says these deficiencies are caused by laziness and cowardice. Kant states that enlightenment is a man freeing himself from self-imposed nonage. He moves on explaining the reasons why this nonage takes place, and then moves on explaining the role of guardians in a society c) Kant in this work, talks about what enlightenment is, and why would someone not be enlightened.…

    • 1114 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Decent Essays

    Manny Pacquiao

    • 242 Words
    • 1 Pages

    Technology brings a lot of advantages such as the easy access of information, entertainment, innovation and creativity, improved lifestyle, and efficiency and productivity. On the contrary, technology is supposed to bridge people together but today, in the society, technology just creates a wall between people instead. It is inevitable nowadays to come across trending topics in Facebook, Twitter or any other social media sites and see people arguing and quarrelling about such trending issue or rumor. Recently, there was this issue about Manny Pacquiao revealing his opinion to the public about his view of same sex marriage and LGBT which became a hot topic in the media that people started bashing Pacquiao and expressing their views contrary…

    • 242 Words
    • 1 Pages
    Decent Essays
  • Great Essays

    Mill On Liberty

    • 1593 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Jeongho Ju Professor Schendan Poli 5: Introduction to Political Thought and Theory 11 Feburary, 2015 How hard is to be free? From the beginning of the society, and up to date, freedom is still a hot topic in public relation between different individuals. Throughout the course of history, individuals fought for freedom for themselves, for their families and they fought for their countries.…

    • 1593 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Great Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Freedom is a concept that cannot be mutually defined by all. This is because of the various aspects that impact one perception on what freedom is and how it should be achieved. Through the text Introduction to Social and Political Society by Omid Payrow Shabani and Monique Deveaux, Immanuel Kant and John Stuart Mill provide their unique philosophies on the concept on freedom and liberty. Kant stands behind positive liberty and advocates that the government can act as an institutionalized version of the best parts of ourselves meaning that freedom does not mean an absence of government but one that helps everyone become more reasonable. Mill, on the other hand, supports negative freedom and believes that the state should only intervene when…

    • 1090 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Age Of Innocence Essay

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Since the dawn of civilization, human beings have congregated to form various bands, clans, tribes, and nations. Over the millennia, these primitive communities have eventually evolved into what we now call “society”–a group of people who share similar values, laws, and traditions living in organized communities for mutual benefits. In the 21st century, society protects our lives, liberties, and property from foreign encroachment; it provides us with education and reliable healthcare; and most importantly of all, it provides a sense of belonging for its members. But while providing such real and laudable benefits to our wellbeing, society also marginalizes, isolates, and imprisons those individuals who do not share its values. Society may nourish…

    • 1413 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    David Hume and Immanuel Kant corresponded beyond numerous doctrines and writings beyond the value of art, while both opposing to the use of ethical didacticism. As theorists, they both highlight the value of fine art as a view of pure virtuoso, with the intent that the beauty and value of the art that is gathered from overall ideologies or through intellect cannot be knowledgeable. However, these two philosophers primarily are at odds over their philosophical message. The superficial agreements cover up the contradictions beyond the degree of unanimity that is shown in the encounters with artistry. Ever the pragmatist, David Hume has skepticism beyond the reasoning’s power; rather it’s ironic that he preserves a sharp…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Superior Essays

    Philosophy’s goal is to find a theory that acts as a guideline on how we, as humans, should act. Before Kant’s theories, philosophers struggled to find a moral rule or principle on how we should act towards other humans. Nevertheless, Kant came up with the Principle of Humanity to act as a main principle on how we should treat humans. The Principle of Humanity states that humans should treat other beings as an end and never as a mere means. To understand this theory, we must understand what Kant means by treating someone as an end, and also what it means to treat another as a mere means.…

    • 1217 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Superior Essays
  • Improved Essays

    Kant's Moral Theory Essay

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Kant’s moral theory is based on the fact that one’s action should be governed by a maxim that follows the purity of the will; the idea that one’s actions should be based on a will that aligns with duty and not on the consequences of one’s actions. In the contrary, rule utilitarianism is based on the consequences of one’s actions and how it impacts the overall happiness of the individuals involved. The following paper focuses on the ideas of duty ethics and utilitarian ethics; and how these ideas can be implemented in the case of James Liang. Kant believes that an act is morally acceptable when such an act perfectly aligns with one’s duty. Furthermore, he believed that all rational beings are obligated by the demands of duty.…

    • 910 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Improved Essays
  • Improved Essays

    “We could not prove freedom to be something actual in ourselves and in human nature. We saw merely that we must presuppose it if we want to think of a being as rational and as endowed with consciousness of its causality as regards actions” (Page 311). Immanuel Kant believed that freedom is a presupposition of morality. Kant was not concerned with the purity of your will for doing something, but rather with the derivation of moral principles from reason alone for example independently of experience. He focused on emphasized the importance of reason and the ration that comes with our moral principles.…

    • 703 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Improved Essays